Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 07/09/21 10:00 - 6.Round
1-5 [90‘]
1-5 [90‘]
5‘ |
0-1
Suárez
|
|
Lü
|
16‘ | |
0-1 HT | ||
46‘ |
Siriphala
Suárez
|
|
46‘ |
Seul-Ki
Chakkuprasart
|
|
Huang
Ning
|
46‘ | |
Lü
Yang
|
46‘ | |
Ning
[1-1]
|
49‘ | |
53‘ |
1-2
Phala
(Seul-Ki)
|
|
56‘ |
[1-3]
Rochela
(Penalty)
|
|
62‘ |
Siriphala
|
|
Ruan
Li
|
66‘ | |
66‘ |
Roller
Sriyarngem
|
|
72‘ |
Sombatyotha
Phala
|
|
Wang
[1-4]
|
76‘ | |
78‘ |
Roller
|
|
Fan
Wu
|
82‘ | |
82‘ |
Kanlayanabandit
Rochela
|
|
Liao
Luo
|
90‘+1 | |
90‘+3 |
1-5
Chappuis
(Roller)
|
|
1-5 FT |
Goals and Highlights
Match stats
CARDS 2 0
CARDS 1 0
ODDS
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
-1.5 | 101 | -114 | +1.5 |
-1.75 | -128 | 106 | +1.75 |
-1.25 | 131 | -159 | +1.25 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Guangzhou Evergrande
Status: Confirmed lineup
Port FC
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Guangzhou Evergrande
-
Bad results in last matches for Guangzhou Evergrande
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach F. Cannavaro as the form record is (0W, 0D, 5L) with their average of 2.4 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (5) matches
Guangzhou Evergrande have fail to win 5 matches in a row.
-
5 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Guangzhou Evergrande. Coach F. Cannavaro can not be satisfied with 5 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Port FC
-
Pakorn Prempakdee is a fresh missing
Coach S. Treephan is without his key player Pakorn Prempakdee (5 matches, 3 goals, 1 assists). Reason: not available. His absence can be a big blow for the team.
-
Bad results in last matches for Port FC
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach S. Treephan as the form record is (1W, 2D, 2L) with their average of 1.4 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/27/21 |
Port FC
|
3-0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 14 - 4 | 6- 2 | 75 - 45 | 6 - 3 |
2 (56%) 0 (10%) |
-345 | 333 | 800 |
Team form
Guangzhou Evergrande Last 6 Matches
21.7 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
06:00 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
|
18.7 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
06:00 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
|
15.7 |
Henan Songshan Longmen
|
07:30 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
5 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 18 - 5 | 9 - 0 | 99 - 36 | 10 - 0 |
10 (18%) 2 (25%) |
-769 | 700 | 1800 | |
3.7 |
Kitchee
|
1 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-0 | 10 - 5 | 4 - 0 | 95 - 48 | 7 - 1 |
5 (44%) 4 (18%) |
-500 | 475 | 1100 | |
30.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 1 |
Kitchee
|
0-1 | 0 - 8 | 0 - 2 | 17 - 76 | 1 - 11 |
2 (15%) 3 (60%) |
1100 | 475 | -500 | |
27.6 |
Port FC
|
3 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 14 - 4 | 6 - 2 | 75 - 45 | 6 - 3 |
2 (56%) 0 (10%) |
-345 | 333 | 800 | |
24.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 2 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-1 | 2 - 19 | 0 - 8 | 27 - 116 | 1 - 7 |
11 (3%) 4 (58%) |
2200 | 1100 | -5000 | |
9.5 |
Cangzhou
|
0 - 2 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-1 | 4 - 14 | 1 - 7 | 26 - 65 | 0 - 5 |
5 (41%) 1 (46%) |
850 | 350 | -278 |
Port FC Last 6 Matches
18.9 |
Port FC
|
06:30 |
Khonkaen United
|
|
12.9 |
True Bangkok United
|
07:00 |
Port FC
|
|
5.9 |
Port FC
|
06:30 |
Police Tero FC
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 |
Port FC
|
1 - 1 |
Kitchee
|
1-1 | 14 - 20 | 5 - 3 | 59 - 88 | 3 - 13 |
3 (45%) 5 (68%) |
125 | 225 | 220 | |
3.7 |
Port FC
|
0 - 3 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-2 | 13 - 21 | 4 - 11 | 57 - 83 | 3 - 8 |
4 (44%) 8 (58%) |
700 | 320 | -303 | |
30.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1 - 1 |
Port FC
|
0-1 | 6 - 17 | 1 - 4 | 54 - 91 | 4 - 6 |
10 (14%) 2 (48%) |
350 | 320 | -167 | |
27.6 |
Port FC
|
3 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 14 - 4 | 6 - 2 | 75 - 45 | 6 - 3 |
2 (56%) 0 (10%) |
-345 | 333 | 800 | |
24.6 |
Kitchee
|
2 - 0 |
Port FC
|
1-0 | 5 - 13 | 3 - 3 | 28 - 99 | 2 - 10 |
2 (63%) 6 (53%) |
-137 | 240 | 320 | |
28.3 |
Nakhonratchasima Mazda FC
|
2 - 2 |
Port FC
|
1-0 | 14 - 13 | 6 - 5 | 96 - 79 | 5 - 3 |
2 (72%) 6 (52%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | OKMK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Tractor Sazi | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:3 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2:6 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 17% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Esteghlal | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.8 | 4.7 | 50% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Al Ahli | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Al Shorta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:12 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Foolad | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.3 | 5.8 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Wahda | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 2.5 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
3. | Goa | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:1 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Viettel | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Kaya | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Nagoya Grampus | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Pohang Steelers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0:10 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.50 |
2. | Gamba Osaka | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Tampines Rovers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:27 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 4.67 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 8.5 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
3. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:24 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 67% | 4.67 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:23 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cerezo Osaka | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Kitchee | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Port FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Johor Darul Ta'zim 04/15/22
|
Group Stage |
FA Cup
vs Qingdao Youth Island 10/13/21
|
1st Round |
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Ulsan 03/15/22
|
Play-offs |
FA Cup
vs MBF Amphawa 10/27/21
|
1st Round |
League Cup
vs Muang Loei United 01/12/22
|
1st Round |