Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 07/06/21 06:00 - 5.Round
5-0 [90‘]
5-0 [90‘]
24‘ |
Zhao
|
|
(Matsuda)
Kato
[1-0]
|
33‘ | |
1-0 HT | ||
46‘ |
Huang
|
|
Nishio
Pagnussat
|
46‘ | |
46‘ |
Huang
He
|
|
(Koike)
Matsumoto
[2-0]
|
53‘ | |
58‘ |
Rao
Zhang
|
|
58‘ |
Yang
Liao
|
|
(Koike)
Pagnussat
[3-0]
|
67‘ | |
68‘ |
Lü
Li
|
|
(Matsuda)
Matsumoto
[4-0]
|
72‘ | |
Takagi
Maruhashi
|
75‘ | |
75‘ |
Zhang
Zhao
|
|
Kida
|
78‘ | |
(Yamada)
Kato
[5-0]
|
90‘+2 | |
5-0 FT |
Goals and Highlights
Match stats
CARDS 1 0
CARDS 2 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -769 | 700 | 1800 | ||
Pre match odds | -769 | 700 | 1800 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
-2 | -120 | -102 | +2 |
-2.25 | 106 | -128 | +2.25 |
-1.75 | -154 | 121 | +1.75 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
10 | -105 | -118 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Cerezo Osaka
Status: Confirmed lineup
Guangzhou Evergrande
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Cerezo Osaka
-
First-choice goalkeeper Kim Jin-Hyeon will miss
Team is without first-choice goalkeeper Kim Jin-Hyeon with 450 minutes played. Reason: not available.
-
Friday: AFC Champions League (Group Stage)
Cerezo Osaka is playing against Kitchee an important AFC Champions League game (Group Stage - 1/1)
Guangzhou Evergrande
-
Zhang is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Jihao Zhang (0 matches, 0 goals, 0 assists) is back after his missing.
-
The coach has to deal with 4 fresh missings
According to the news, the team is without 4 fresh missing. These players join the missing list: Guo, Chen, Zhou, Zhou.
-
Friday: AFC Champions League (Group Stage)
Guangzhou Evergrande is playing against Port FC an important AFC Champions League game (Group Stage - 1/1)
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/24/21 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-2 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-1 | 2 - 19 | 0- 8 | 27 - 116 | 1 - 7 |
11 (3%) 4 (58%) |
2200 | 1100 | -5000 | |
04/17/18 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
3-1 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1-1 | 22 - 13 | 7- 3 | 96 - 57 | 8 - 2 |
4 (73%) 10 (24%) |
- | - | - | |
02/21/18 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-0 | 12 - 14 | 5- 3 | 63 - 64 | 10 - 5 |
4 (64%) 2 (81%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Cerezo Osaka Last 6 Matches
21.7 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
06:00 |
Tokyo
|
|
17.7 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
06:00 |
Vissel Kobe
|
|
9.7 |
Kitchee
|
06:00 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 |
Port FC
|
0 - 3 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-2 | 13 - 21 | 4 - 11 | 57 - 83 | 3 - 8 |
4 (44%) 8 (58%) |
700 | 320 | -303 | |
30.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1 - 1 |
Port FC
|
0-1 | 6 - 17 | 1 - 4 | 54 - 91 | 4 - 6 |
10 (14%) 2 (48%) |
350 | 320 | -167 | |
27.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
2 - 1 |
Kitchee
|
0-1 | 10 - 2 | 3 - 1 | 70 - 36 | 4 - 3 |
1 (59%) 0 (66%) |
-400 | 375 | 1000 | |
24.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 2 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-1 | 2 - 19 | 0 - 8 | 27 - 116 | 1 - 7 |
11 (3%) 4 (58%) |
2200 | 1100 | -5000 | |
9.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
2 - 0 |
Gainare Tottori
|
2-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
4 (50%) 4 (50%) |
- | - | - | |
30.5 |
Vegalta Sendai
|
1 - 1 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-0 | 10 - 16 | 5 - 7 | 37 - 54 | 1 - 5 |
5 (51%) 2 (65%) |
240 | 250 | 105 |
Guangzhou Evergrande Last 6 Matches
18.7 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
06:00 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan
|
|
15.7 |
Henan Songshan Longmen
|
07:30 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
|
9.7 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
10:00 |
Port FC
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 |
Kitchee
|
1 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-0 | 10 - 5 | 4 - 0 | 95 - 48 | 7 - 1 |
5 (44%) 4 (18%) |
-500 | 475 | 1100 | |
30.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 1 |
Kitchee
|
0-1 | 0 - 8 | 0 - 2 | 17 - 76 | 1 - 11 |
2 (15%) 3 (60%) |
1100 | 475 | -500 | |
27.6 |
Port FC
|
3 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 14 - 4 | 6 - 2 | 75 - 45 | 6 - 3 |
2 (56%) 0 (10%) |
-345 | 333 | 800 | |
24.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 2 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-1 | 2 - 19 | 0 - 8 | 27 - 116 | 1 - 7 |
11 (3%) 4 (58%) |
2200 | 1100 | -5000 | |
9.5 |
Cangzhou
|
0 - 2 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0-1 | 4 - 14 | 1 - 7 | 26 - 65 | 0 - 5 |
5 (41%) 1 (46%) |
850 | 350 | -278 | |
2.5 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
2 - 0 |
Shenzhen
|
1-0 | 9 - 20 | 1 - 2 | 37 - 44 | 4 - 3 |
4 (42%) 3 (44%) |
-110 | 260 | 300 |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | OKMK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Tractor Sazi | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:3 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2:6 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 17% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Esteghlal | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.8 | 4.7 | 50% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Al Ahli | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Al Shorta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:12 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Foolad | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.3 | 5.8 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Wahda | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 2.5 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
3. | Goa | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:1 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Viettel | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Kaya | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Nagoya Grampus | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Pohang Steelers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0:10 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.50 |
2. | Gamba Osaka | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Tampines Rovers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:27 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 4.67 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 8.5 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
3. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:24 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 67% | 4.67 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:23 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cerezo Osaka | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Kitchee | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Port FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
Ybc Levain Cup
vs Gamba Osaka 09/01/21
|
Quarter-finals |
AFC Champions League
vs Kitchee 07/09/21
|
Group Stage |
Emperor Cup
vs Albirex Niigata 08/04/21
|
3rd Round |
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Port FC 07/09/21
|
Group Stage |
FA Cup
vs Qingdao Youth Island 10/13/21
|
1st Round |