Preview match
MATCH REPORT
USA - USL Championship - 10/03/20 19:00 - 28.Round
2-1 [90‘]
2-1 [90‘]
(Mertz)
Lee
[1-0]
|
15‘ | |
Lee
|
37‘ | |
43‘ |
Turner
|
|
1-0 HT | ||
56‘ |
Zandi
De Vries
|
|
63‘ |
[1-1]
McGlynn
(Penalty)
|
|
Lee
Velarde
|
69‘ | |
Mensah
Dikwa
|
69‘ | |
79‘ |
Flores
Aaronson
|
|
88‘ |
Sullivan
Patrick Kader Bohui
|
|
88‘ |
Picazo
|
|
(Forbes)
Dikwa
[2-1]
|
90‘+2 | |
Mertz
da Silva Lindström
|
90‘+5 | |
2-1 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 3 0
CARDS 2 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -909 | 700 | 1300 | ||
Pre match odds | -909 | 700 | 1300 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Status: Confirmed lineup
Bethlehem Steel
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
-
Unbeaten in their past games at home
Pittsburgh Riverhounds are unbeaten in their past 5 league games at home against Bethlehem Steel (4W,1D)
-
Unbeaten in their past away games
Pittsburgh Riverhounds are unbeaten in their past 5 away league games against Bethlehem Steel (4W, 1D).
-
Pittsburgh Riverhounds have good form in the last 5 games
Coach R. Lilley can be satisfied with his team form (4W, 0D, 1L) from the last 5 games.
-
Good form in the last 5 home games for Pittsburgh Riverhounds
In the last 5 games at the Highmark Stadium form record is (3W, 1D, 1L) which is a reward for Pittsburgh Riverhounds fans with 0 average home attendance.
Bethlehem Steel
-
First-choice goalkeeper Matthew Freese will miss
Team is without first-choice goalkeeper Matthew Freese with 630 minutes played. Reason: not available.
-
Bad results in last matches for Bethlehem Steel
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach M. LeBlanc as the form record is (1W, 1D, 3L) with their average of 2.4 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (4) matches
Bethlehem Steel have failed to win 4 matches in a row. Last win was against Loudoun United (4-0) on 16.9.20
-
Poor form in away games
3 losses in 5 games. (0W, 2D, 3L) is the record in away games. With their average of 3 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/01/20 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
4-0 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
3-0 | 7 - 5 | 5- 2 | 107 - 59 | 7 - 3 |
4 (76%) 4 (48%) |
-909 | 800 | 1200 | |
07/18/20 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-6 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0-2 | 2 - 10 | 1- 8 | 33 - 56 | 0 - 7 |
5 (8%) 1 (14%) |
550 | 333 | -227 | |
07/04/19 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
1-0 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (34%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
03/30/19 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-2 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (14%) 0 (30%) |
- | - | - | |
10/20/18 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
2-2 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 | 1 - 1 | 5- 3 | 54 - 47 | 7 - 3 |
0 (40%) 2 (50%) |
- | - | - | |
09/07/18 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
4-1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (50%) 2 (48%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Pittsburgh Riverhounds Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0 - 1 |
Hartford Athletic
|
0-1 | 13 - 3 | 1 - 3 | 125 - 62 | 8 - 3 |
1 (76%) 5 (64%) |
-400 | 450 | 800 | |
19.9 |
Loudoun United
|
0 - 1 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0-0 | 4 - 5 | 1 - 2 | 38 - 50 | 1 - 1 |
3 (57%) 1 (64%) |
650 | 500 | -400 | |
12.9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
5 - 0 |
Hartford Athletic
|
3-0 | 8 - 1 | 5 - 0 | 82 - 35 | 7 - 1 |
2 (65%) 2 (65%) |
-345 | 375 | 750 | |
5.9 |
New York RB II
|
0 - 3 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0-1 | 4 - 7 | 1 - 4 | 86 - 62 | 4 - 3 |
1 (45%) 3 (60%) |
190 | 250 | 110 | |
1.9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
3 - 0 |
Loudoun United
|
2-0 | 11 - 8 | 7 - 2 | 73 - 87 | 7 - 3 |
5 (54%) 4 (53%) |
-400 | 475 | 900 | |
28.8 |
Hartford Athletic
|
0 - 3 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
|
0-2 | 8 - 5 | 3 - 4 | 69 - 29 | 6 - 1 |
1 (70%) 2 (74%) |
240 | 260 | -118 |
Bethlehem Steel Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.9 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2 - 3 |
Hartford Athletic
|
1-2 | 12 - 9 | 4 - 3 | 51 - 50 | 5 - 6 |
3 (57%) 6 (49%) |
260 | 350 | -133 | |
26.9 |
New York RB II
|
5 - 4 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-1 | 22 - 9 | 13 - 6 | 96 - 90 | 8 - 6 |
5 (39%) 2 (52%) |
-333 | 350 | 650 | |
23.9 |
Hartford Athletic
|
1 - 1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 | 10 - 6 | 5 - 4 | 68 - 63 | 8 - 7 |
5 (59%) 2 (65%) |
-333 | 400 | 550 | |
20.9 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0 - 3 |
Hartford Athletic
|
0-2 | 18 - 8 | 3 - 4 | 69 - 52 | 4 - 3 |
0 (51%) 1 (46%) |
260 | 275 | -133 | |
16.9 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
4 - 0 |
Loudoun United
|
3-0 | 15 - 13 | 12 - 6 | 39 - 51 | 4 - 7 |
1 (56%) 2 (54%) |
320 | 260 | -133 | |
12.9 |
Loudoun United
|
1 - 1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-1 | 14 - 31 | 6 - 14 | 60 - 102 | 4 - 7 |
3 (43%) 5 (48%) |
-175 | 275 | 400 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Reno 1868 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 43:21 | 36 |
|
2.25 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 81% | 75% | 4.00 |
2. | Sacramento Republic | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 27:17 | 30 |
|
1.88 | 56% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 59% | 46% | 2.75 |
3. | Tacoma Defiance | 16 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 25:32 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 69% | 1.3 | 2.9 | 87% | 87% | 3.56 |
4. | Portland Timbers II | 16 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 20:50 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 69% | 1.6 | 4.3 | 94% | 94% | 4.38 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Phoenix Rising | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 46:17 | 35 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 87% | 67% | 3.94 |
2. | LA Galaxy II | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 29:32 | 26 |
|
1.38 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 88% | 81% | 3.81 |
3. | Orange County | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 18:18 | 24 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 1.9 | 4.9 | 63% | 44% | 2.25 |
4. | San Diego Loyal | 16 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 17:18 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.4 | 3.2 | 75% | 38% | 2.19 |
5. | Las Vegas Lights | 16 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 24:34 | 11 |
|
0.38 | 75% | 2.0 | 4.8 | 81% | 63% | 3.63 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
2. | New Mexico United | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 23:17 | 27 |
|
1.75 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 86% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Colorado Springs | 16 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 19:28 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 69% | 1.5 | 3.9 | 78% | 60% | 2.94 |
4. | Real Monarchs | 16 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 14:25 | 11 |
|
0.88 | 44% | 1.8 | 4.6 | 62% | 43% | 2.44 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | San Antonio | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 30:14 | 33 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 75% | 50% | 2.75 |
2. | Tulsa Roughnecks | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 21:16 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 100% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 88% | 39% | 2.47 |
3. | Austin Bold | 16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 30:27 | 22 |
|
1.25 | 75% | 2.4 | 5.3 | 88% | 63% | 3.56 |
4. | OKC Energy | 16 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12:29 | 10 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 2.6 | 4.7 | 81% | 50% | 2.56 |
5. | Rio Grande Valley | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 17:28 | 9 |
|
0.88 | 71% | 1.4 | 4.4 | 79% | 57% | 3.21 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Louisville City | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 28:12 | 35 |
|
2.75 | 100% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 66% | 37% | 2.50 |
2. | Saint Louis FC | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 22:21 | 25 |
|
1.50 | 56% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 73% | 42% | 2.69 |
3. | Indy Eleven | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 21:19 | 23 |
|
0.88 | 56% | 1.9 | 4.2 | 65% | 42% | 2.50 |
4. | Sporting Kansas City II | 16 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 21:30 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 75% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 93% | 89% | 3.19 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Hartford Athletic | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 31:24 | 35 |
|
2.38 | 63% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 86% | 73% | 3.44 |
2. | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 16 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 39:10 | 34 |
|
2.38 | 31% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 75% | 69% | 3.06 |
3. | New York RB II | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 30:37 | 15 |
|
1.13 | 63% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 89% | 83% | 4.19 |
4. | Bethlehem Steel | 16 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 20:45 | 9 |
|
0.63 | 56% | 1.6 | 4.3 | 94% | 75% | 4.06 |
5. | Loudoun United | 13 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10:28 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 54% | 2.6 | 3.5 | 82% | 51% | 2.92 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Charlotte Independence | 16 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 24:22 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 75% | 56% | 2.88 |
2. | Birmingham Legion | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 29:19 | 25 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 88% | 63% | 3.00 |
3. | North Carolina | 15 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 17:21 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 1.3 | 4.1 | 64% | 57% | 2.53 |
4. | Memphis 901 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 24:31 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 73% | 1.7 | 3.5 | 86% | 71% | 3.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 25:11 | 33 |
|
1.88 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 75% | 44% | 2.25 |
2. | Charleston Battery | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 26:15 | 30 |
|
2.38 | 53% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 79% | 47% | 2.73 |
3. | Miami FC II | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 20:34 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 63% | 2.6 | 5.1 | 88% | 69% | 3.38 |
4. | Atlanta United II | 16 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 23:33 | 12 |
|
0.88 | 75% | 1.9 | 3.4 | 88% | 75% | 3.50 |