Preview match
MATCH REPORT
United States - MLS Next Pro - 08/02/24 15:00
0-1 [97+11‘]
0-1 [97+11‘]
Anderson
Olivas
|
27‘ | |
31‘ |
0-1
Stitz
(Castellano)
|
|
45‘+5 |
Gibert
|
|
0-1 HT | ||
Ngabo
Pariano
|
46‘ | |
55‘ |
Castellano
|
|
Tucker
Berdecio
|
57‘ | |
59‘ |
Kuisel
Stout
|
|
68‘ |
Matuskiewicz
Gibert
|
|
70‘ |
Valoyes
Stitz
|
|
70‘ |
Samways
Castellano
|
|
Davis
Soria
|
80‘ | |
Sullivan
LeBlanc
|
80‘ | |
87‘ |
Hylton
Mangione
|
|
Pariano
Johnson
|
90‘+1 | |
Westfield
|
90‘+9 | |
0-1 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 2 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -133 | 300 | 240 | ||
Pre match odds | -143 | 275 | 290 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | 135 | -175 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Bethlehem Steel
Status: Confirmed lineup
FC Cincinnati II
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Bethlehem Steel
-
Olney is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Christopher Olney (25 matches, 7 goals, 10 assists) is back after his missing.
-
First-choice goalkeeper Andrew Rick will miss
Team is without first-choice goalkeeper Andrew Rick with 1980 minutes played. Reason: not available.
FC Cincinnati II
-
Return of first-choice goalkeeper Hunter Morse
Hunter Morse is back after he misses (1) games and should be first-choice again.
-
Good results in last away matches for FC Cincinnati II
Away matches are always difficult but the FC Cincinnati II is currently in good form within the last 5 away games. With form record (4W, 0D, 1L)
-
Stitz is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Ben Stitz (27 matches, 8 goals, 3 assists) is back after his missing.
-
Machado is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Juan Machado (9 matches, 0 goals, 0 assists) is back after his missing.
-
First-choice goalkeeper Paul Walters will miss
Team is without first-choice goalkeeper Paul Walters with 1290 minutes played. Reason: not available.
-
The coach has to deal with 4 fresh missings
According to the news, the team is without 4 fresh missing. These players join the missing list: Benalcazar, Tablante, Daley, Santos.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/06/24 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-2 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
0-0 | 8 - 10 | 3- 5 | 53 - 37 | 5 - 2 |
3 (57%) 3 (50%) |
-111 | 275 | 210 | |
04/28/24 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
3-1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 | 13 - 10 | 9- 7 | 44 - 50 | 5 - 5 |
2 (36%) 2 (56%) |
260 | 320 | -152 | |
08/13/23 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-2 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
1-1 | 17 - 5 | 8- 4 | 68 - 38 | 7 - 1 |
2 (58%) 5 (48%) |
-278 | 375 | 475 | |
06/04/23 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
2-1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 | 10 - 7 | 6- 4 | 28 - 31 | 4 - 4 |
4 (60%) 2 (50%) |
180 | 275 | 105 | |
08/07/22 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
2-3 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-1 | 13 - 16 | 7- 8 | 28 - 49 | 2 - 7 |
2 (52%) 2 (43%) |
240 | 375 | -154 | |
03/27/22 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
2-0 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Bethlehem Steel Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.7 |
Columbus Crew II
|
3 - 2 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1-0 | 12 - 17 | 8 - 10 | 39 - 62 | 2 - 6 |
4 (56%) 4 (49%) |
137 | 290 | 130 | |
19.7 |
New York City II
|
2 - 1 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-1 | 13 - 7 | 5 - 3 | 69 - 23 | 4 - 2 |
3 (64%) 5 (56%) |
137 | 250 | 150 | |
11.7 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
3 - 1 |
Chattanooga
|
1-1 | 17 - 8 | 6 - 3 | 63 - 49 | 3 - 7 |
3 (52%) 3 (64%) |
-111 | 300 | 200 | |
6.7 |
New England II
|
1 - 2 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-2 | 1 - 8 | 0 - 2 | 11 - 28 | - |
1 (55%) 2 (57%) |
- | - | - | |
30.6 |
Toronto II
|
0 - 4 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
0-4 | 8 - 10 | 4 - 5 | 27 - 17 | 8 - 2 |
3 (49%) 8 (53%) |
175 | 290 | 105 | |
26.6 |
Bethlehem Steel
|
1 - 4 |
New York RB II
|
0-2 | 13 - 16 | 8 - 7 | 47 - 38 | 5 - 5 |
2 (42%) 3 (45%) |
-164 | 333 | 275 |
FC Cincinnati II Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.7 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
5 - 0 |
Chicago Fire II
|
2-0 | 21 - 4 | 12 - 0 | 58 - 22 | 6 - 2 |
3 (51%) 7 (35%) |
-200 | 350 | 333 | |
21.7 |
Columbus Crew II
|
6 - 1 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
1-1 | 15 - 18 | 11 - 9 | 41 - 54 | 6 - 6 |
5 (65%) 5 (56%) |
155 | 275 | 120 | |
14.7 |
Toronto II
|
1 - 2 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
0-1 | 16 - 8 | 9 - 3 | 31 - 19 | 8 - 2 |
5 (55%) 5 (57%) |
162 | 240 | 130 | |
7.7 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
1 - 1 |
New York City II
|
0-1 | 7 - 7 | 3 - 4 | 64 - 44 | 11 - 10 |
5 (64%) 1 (56%) |
105 | 310 | 162 | |
30.6 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
1 - 0 |
New England II
|
1-0 | 16 - 7 | 7 - 3 | 46 - 38 | 5 - 8 |
5 (48%) 1 (59%) |
100 | 270 | 200 | |
23.6 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
2 - 1 |
Huntsville City
|
1-0 | 8 - 3 | 3 - 1 | 25 - 26 | 1 - 7 |
2 (56%) 6 (25%) |
-133 | 300 | 250 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastern Conference | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | FC Cincinnati II | 28 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 47:34 | 52 |
|
1.38 | 61% | 2.1 | 3.8 | 86% | 71% | 2.89 |
2. | Bethlehem Steel | 28 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 59:41 | 49 |
|
1.63 | 75% | 2.1 | 5.0 | 100% | 63% | 3.57 |
3. | Inter Miami II | 28 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 53:45 | 48 |
|
2.00 | 68% | 2.6 | 3.8 | 92% | 69% | 3.50 |
4. | New York City II | 28 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 57:45 | 42 |
|
1.13 | 68% | 2.0 | 4.5 | 83% | 67% | 3.64 |
5. | Orlando City II | 28 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 53:42 | 42 |
|
2.25 | 75% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 100% | 63% | 3.39 |
6. | Chicago Fire II | 28 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 51:51 | 42 |
|
1.50 | 71% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 55% | 3.64 |
7. | Columbus Crew II | 28 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 53:47 | 41 |
|
1.00 | 79% | 1.8 | 4.4 | 93% | 57% | 3.57 |
8. | Crown Legacy | 28 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 51:46 | 40 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 1.9 | 5.4 | 93% | 62% | 3.46 |
9. | Carolina Core | 28 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 39:45 | 40 |
|
2.25 | 71% | 1.9 | 4.2 | 100% | 85% | 3.00 |
10. | Chattanooga | 28 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 45:42 | 37 |
|
1.13 | 75% | 2.1 | 4.0 | 79% | 53% | 3.11 |
11. | New York RB II | 28 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 56:61 | 36 |
|
1.00 | 82% | 2.4 | 4.7 | 88% | 67% | 4.18 |
12. | Toronto II | 28 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 43:50 | 36 |
|
1.38 | 75% | 1.9 | 4.9 | 90% | 73% | 3.32 |
13. | Atlanta United II | 28 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 42:64 | 28 |
|
0.63 | 71% | 1.8 | 5.5 | 81% | 65% | 3.79 |
14. | Huntsville City | 28 | 8 | 5 | 15 | 39:53 | 29 |
|
1.50 | 61% | 2.7 | 4.8 | 88% | 67% | 3.29 |
15. | New England II | 28 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 37:59 | 18 |
|
0.38 | 82% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 86% | 79% | 3.43 |
Western Conference | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | St. Louis City II | 28 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 53:35 | 55 |
|
2.38 | 61% | 2.3 | 3.4 | 71% | 38% | 3.14 |
2. | North Texas | 28 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 56:32 | 56 |
|
2.13 | 57% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 85% | 52% | 3.14 |
3. | San Jose Earthquakes II | 28 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 41:28 | 47 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 2.6 | 2.7 | 58% | 35% | 2.46 |
4. | Los Angeles II | 28 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 51:54 | 42 |
|
1.00 | 71% | 1.9 | 4.6 | 92% | 61% | 3.75 |
5. | Tacoma Defiance | 28 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 59:53 | 44 |
|
1.50 | 75% | 2.1 | 5.6 | 80% | 70% | 4.00 |
6. | LA Galaxy II | 28 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 49:49 | 35 |
|
0.75 | 82% | 1.6 | 2.5 | 86% | 71% | 3.50 |
7. | Houston Dynamo FC II | 28 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 46:45 | 37 |
|
1.63 | 75% | 2.1 | 4.3 | 84% | 61% | 3.25 |
8. | Whitecaps FC II | 28 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 45:44 | 37 |
|
0.63 | 61% | 1.6 | 3.0 | 73% | 67% | 3.18 |
9. | Sporting Kansas City II | 28 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 53:57 | 36 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 2.1 | 5.1 | 100% | 79% | 3.93 |
10. | Portland Timbers II | 28 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 50:51 | 36 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 83% | 45% | 3.61 |
11. | Real Monarchs | 28 | 9 | 7 | 12 | 38:40 | 34 |
|
1.88 | 61% | 2.4 | 5.2 | 81% | 56% | 2.79 |
12. | Minnesota United II | 28 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 43:73 | 28 |
|
1.38 | 75% | 1.7 | 5.3 | 90% | 82% | 4.14 |
13. | Austin II | 28 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 51:57 | 31 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 2.2 | 3.4 | 69% | 62% | 3.86 |
14. | Colorado Rapids II | 28 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 37:54 | 22 |
|
0.13 | 68% | 2.2 | 3.3 | 100% | 65% | 3.25 |