Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Sao Paolo Youth Cup - 01/12/23 17:00
0-0 [90‘]
0-0 [90‘]
0-0 HT | ||
0-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 5 0
CARDS 3 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -182 | 275 | 425 | ||
Pre match odds | -149 | 260 | 333 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
-1 | 130 | -169 | +1 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | -118 | -105 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
10.0 | -120 | -102 |
Lineups
Mirassol U20
-
No need to travel
Mirassol U20 playing again at their own stadium (3 games in a row at home). It can be an advantage as the team does not need to travel.
-
Saturday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (3rd Round)
Mirassol U20 is playing against Chapecoense-SC U20 an important Sao Paolo Youth Cup game (3rd Round - 1/1)
Real Ariquemes U20
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Team form
Mirassol U20 Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.1 |
Mirassol U20
|
1 - 0 |
Chapecoense-SC U20
|
0-0 | 11 - 12 | 4 - 4 | 66 - 61 | 2 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
115 | 180 | 240 | |
6.1 |
Mirassol U20
|
2 - 0 |
Inter de Minas U20
|
1-0 | 11 - 19 | 7 - 8 | 65 - 86 | 4 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-120 | 225 | 280 | |
3.1 |
Mirassol U20
|
3 - 1 |
União ABC U20
|
2-0 | 16 - 16 | 7 - 6 | 79 - 66 | 10 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-556 | 500 | 1200 | |
28.9 |
Internacional U20
|
3 - 1 |
Mirassol U20
|
2-0 | 16 - 11 | 12 - 3 | 35 - 33 | 2 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-278 | 333 | 550 | |
22.9 |
Capivariano U20
|
1 - 1 |
Mirassol U20
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 65 - 18 | 9 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.9 |
Mirassol U20
|
1 - 1 |
Ferroviária U20
|
1-0 | 7 - 14 | 3 - 3 | 40 - 103 | 3 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
220 | 250 | -105 |
Real Ariquemes U20 Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.1 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
2 - 0 |
Portuguesa U20
|
2-0 | 6 - 3 | 5 - 2 | 29 - 52 | 3 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
300 | 260 | -143 | |
6.1 |
Tanabi SP U20
|
2 - 0 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
1-0 | 8 - 14 | 5 - 7 | 83 - 86 | 5 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-110 | 220 | 275 | |
3.1 |
Nautico U20
|
0 - 2 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
0-1 | 7 - 15 | 2 - 5 | 76 - 82 | 4 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-143 | 333 | 240 | |
10.10 |
Remo U20
|
3 - 2 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
2-1 | 13 - 14 | 9 - 6 | 29 - 17 | 3 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-222 | 320 | 425 | |
4.10 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
1 - 1 |
Remo U20
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
28.9 |
Real Ariquemes U20
|
4 - 0 |
Santana U20
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Tanabi SP U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Real Ariquemes U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Portuguesa U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Nautico U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cruzeiro U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
2. | Capivariano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
3. | Penapolense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | Comercial MS U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Sport Recife U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 0.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Comercial U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.7 | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
3. | Inter Limeira U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.67 |
4. | Volta Redonda U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 9.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Corinthians U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 9.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
2. | Zumbi U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Ferroviária U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 7.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | Fast Clube U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Goias U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
1. | Guaratinguetá U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:1 | 3 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
2. | AC Guaratinguetá U20 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2:2 | 2 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Pague Menos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 75% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Gama U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 0.0 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Fluminense U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 25% | 3.00 |
2. | Porto Vitória U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Imperatriz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:10 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
4. | Taubaté U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Novorizontino U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 5.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Vitória da Conquista U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
3. | Figueirense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | União Suzano U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Coritiba U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
2. | Flamengo SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.3 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | São José PA U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
4. | Guarulhos U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Sao Paulo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
2. | CSP U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Marília U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:6 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.0 | 1.7 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 | |
4. | Porto Velho EC U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group 18 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | América Mineiro U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 8.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.67 |
2. | Retrô U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
3. | Ponte Preta U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 6.7 | 25% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | VOCEM U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.7 | 33% | 33% | 3.33 |
Group 19 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Botafogo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | São Carlos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 5.7 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | Pinheirense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
4. | Grêmio São-Carlense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 100% | 3.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Mirassol U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Chapecoense-SC U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | União ABC U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Inter de Minas U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
Group 20 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Bragantino U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
2. | Maringá U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Lemense U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.67 |
3. | EC Lemense U20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | - | - | 50% | 17% | 0 |
4. | ABC U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 21 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ituano U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Desportivo Brasil U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
3. | Camboriú U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | CRB U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 22 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Rio Claro SP U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.3 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
2. | Sharjah Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Madureira U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Ceará U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 9.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group 23 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | SKA Brasil U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 4.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Aster Brasil U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
3. | JI-Parana RO U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Vitoria U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:4 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 4.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 24 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Internacional U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
2. | Oeste U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
3. | Rosário Central U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 2.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Fluminense PI U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 25 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | São Bernardo U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Bahia U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1:0 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
3. | Operário PR U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:4 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 8.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
4. | CSA U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 9.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group 26 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Santo André U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
2. | Santos U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Falcon U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | São Raimundo RR U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group 27 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Atletico-MG U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:3 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 8.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Água Santa U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 4.0 | 7.3 | 33% | 33% | 3.33 |
3. | Mixto U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 6.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
4. | Galvez U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
Group 28 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Vila Nova U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 4.3 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Nova Iguaçu U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | Mauaense U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Mauá U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:4 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 75% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 29 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Vasco U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.0 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Hercílio Luz U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.67 |
3. | Osasco Audax U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.0 | 3.7 | 17% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Ricanato U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.67 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Palmeiras U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 8.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
2. | Juazeirense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 1.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
3. | Rio Preto U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.7 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Santana U20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
4. | América SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 30 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Botafogo PB U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 2.67 |
2. | Ibrachina U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Santa Cruz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Canaã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 31 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Remo U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 5.0 | 1.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
2. | Fortaleza U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 5.0 | 7.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | Juventus U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 3.7 | 6.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | São Caetano U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1:3 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.3 | 5.3 | 50% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 32 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | XV de Piracicaba U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Nacional SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | Juventude U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
4. | Alecrim U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Atlético GO U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 7.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
2. | Sampaio Corrêa U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Itabaiana U20 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 4.67 |
4. | Botafogo SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 100% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Flamengo RJ U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 8.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Floresta CE U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | XV de Jaú U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Aparecidense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ceilândia U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:3 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
2. | Avaí U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 4.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Catanduva U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
4. | América RN U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5:6 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Atletico-PR U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Picos PI U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.33 |
3. | Barretos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | São Bento U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Gremio U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 8.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Guarani U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 4.0 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Francana U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.67 |
4. | Cruzeiro AL U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1:2 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 1.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cuiabá U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
2. | Parauapebas U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.0 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
3. | Velo Clube U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupã U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:12 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.3 | 33% | 33% | 4.33 |