Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 07/11/21 08:00 - 6.Round
0-4 [90‘]
0-4 [90‘]
24‘ |
Jo
|
|
37‘ |
0-1
Nishi
(Cesinha)
|
|
43‘ |
Unknown
|
|
0-1 HT | ||
46‘ |
Ahn
Hwang
|
|
48‘ |
0-2
Lee
(Hong)
|
|
58‘ |
0-3
Edgar
(Lee)
|
|
61‘ |
Jeong
Lee
|
|
Jordan Perez Dizon
Bugas
|
64‘ | |
66‘ |
Han-Bin
Rae Lee
|
|
73‘ |
0-4
Jeong
(Cesinha)
|
|
Marañón
Hayes
|
74‘ | |
80‘ |
Seong-Su
Choi
|
|
80‘ |
Oh
Nishi
|
|
Bugas
Jarvis
|
90‘ | |
90‘+3 |
Cesinha
|
|
Marasigan
|
90‘+4 | |
0-4 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 1 0
CARDS 3 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | 1400 | 1000 | -1667 | ||
Pre match odds | 1400 | 1000 | -1667 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
+2.5 | 100 | -112 | -2.5 |
+2.75 | -127 | 105 | -2.75 |
+2.25 | 121 | -147 | -2.25 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | 240 | -303 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
9.5 | -118 | -105 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Ceres Philippines
Status: Confirmed lineup
Daegu
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Ceres Philippines
-
Sean Kane is a fresh missing
Coach J. Withe is without his key player Sean Kane (5 matches, 0 goals, 1 assists). Reason: not available. His absence can be a big blow for the team.
-
Bad results in last matches for Ceres Philippines
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach J. Withe as the form record is (1W, 1D, 3L) with their average of 4 goals conceded per game.
Daegu
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/29/21 |
Daegu
|
7-0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
3-0 | 13 - 5 | 8- 2 | 55 - 51 | 2 - 1 |
2 (52%) 0 (22%) |
-588 | 650 | 1200 |
Team form
Ceres Philippines Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
2 - 3 |
Ceres Philippines
|
2-0 | 3 - 13 | 2 - 4 | 38 - 79 | 3 - 4 |
5 (25%) 7 (28%) |
375 | 280 | -189 | |
5.7 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0 - 2 |
Kawasaki Frontale
|
0-1 | 5 - 22 | 1 - 11 | 28 - 82 | 1 - 6 |
8 (7%) 8 (27%) |
2800 | 2500 | -10000 | |
2.7 |
Kawasaki Frontale
|
8 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
2-0 | 14 - 0 | 11 - 0 | 77 - 22 | 10 - 2 |
6 (60%) 1 (26%) |
-5000 | 1400 | 2000 | |
29.6 |
Daegu
|
7 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
3-0 | 13 - 5 | 8 - 2 | 55 - 51 | 2 - 1 |
2 (52%) 0 (22%) |
-588 | 650 | 1200 | |
26.6 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 1 |
Beijing Guoan
|
1-0 | 7 - 3 | 3 - 1 | 68 - 21 | 10 - 1 |
0 (17%) 11 (7%) |
-250 | 333 | 650 | |
9.11 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 2 |
Kaya
|
0-2 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Daegu Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.7 |
Daegu
|
1 - 3 |
Kawasaki Frontale
|
1-1 | 9 - 15 | 4 - 8 | 60 - 110 | 3 - 6 |
3 (52%) 9 (65%) |
475 | 300 | -222 | |
5.7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
0 - 3 |
Daegu
|
0-1 | 1 - 32 | 1 - 12 | 18 - 120 | 0 - 13 |
5 (14%) 5 (38%) |
2000 | 1200 | -2000 | |
2.7 |
Daegu
|
5 - 0 |
Beijing Guoan
|
2-0 | 22 - 9 | 8 - 3 | 133 - 50 | 9 - 1 |
2 (51%) 3 (16%) |
-5000 | 1600 | 2000 | |
29.6 |
Daegu
|
7 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
3-0 | 13 - 5 | 8 - 2 | 55 - 51 | 2 - 1 |
2 (52%) 0 (22%) |
-588 | 650 | 1200 | |
26.6 |
Kawasaki Frontale
|
3 - 2 |
Daegu
|
1-1 | 14 - 9 | 5 - 4 | 58 - 42 | 8 - 5 |
4 (71%) 3 (54%) |
-250 | 333 | 600 | |
6.6 |
Daegu
|
1 - 1 |
Seoul
|
0-0 | 12 - 8 | 5 - 5 | 69 - 48 | 8 - 3 |
2 (73%) 5 (51%) |
-149 | 250 | 450 |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | OKMK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Tractor Sazi | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:3 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2:6 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 17% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Esteghlal | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.8 | 4.7 | 50% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Al Ahli | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Al Shorta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:12 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Foolad | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.3 | 5.8 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Wahda | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 2.5 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
3. | Goa | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:1 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Viettel | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Kaya | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Nagoya Grampus | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Pohang Steelers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0:10 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.50 |
2. | Gamba Osaka | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Tampines Rovers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:27 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 4.67 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 8.5 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
3. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:24 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 67% | 4.67 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:23 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cerezo Osaka | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Kitchee | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Port FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Jeonnam Dragons 04/15/22
|
Group Stage |
Competitions | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Nagoya Grampus 09/14/21
|
8th Finals |
Korean Cup
vs Sangju Sangmu 08/11/21
|
Quarter-finals |