Preview match
MATCH REPORT
United States - USL League Two - 07/21/24 22:30
1-0 [98+8‘]
1-0 [98+8‘]
Unknown
[1-0]
|
37‘ | |
1-0 HT | ||
1-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Lineups
Tucson
-
No need to travel
Tucson playing again at their own stadium (3 games in a row at home). It can be an advantage as the team does not need to travel.
-
Tucson have good form in the last 5 games
Coach Jonathan Pearlman can be satisfied with his team form (3W, 2D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (9) for Tucson
Tucson are unbeaten in their last 9 USL League Two games (6W, 3D). Players scored 24 goals and 9 conceded in that run.
-
Good form in the last 5 home games for Tucson
In the last 5 games at the Kino North Stadium form record is (3W, 2D, 0L) which is a reward for Tucson fans with 0 average home attendance.
-
Unbeaten run (7) at home stadium
Tucson are unbeaten in their last 7 home games in USL League Two (5W, 2D). Players scored 19 goals and 5 conceded in that run.
Ventura County Fusion
-
Ventura County Fusion have good form in the last 5 games
Coach Mike Elias can be satisfied with his team form (5W, 0D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (5) for Ventura County Fusion
Ventura County Fusion are unbeaten in their last 5 USL League Two games (5W, 0D). Players scored 11 goals and 3 conceded in that run.
-
Good results in last away matches for Ventura County Fusion
Away matches are always difficult but the Ventura County Fusion is currently in good form within the last 5 away games. With form record (3W, 1D, 1L)
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/28/24 |
Tucson
|
2-1 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
05/24/24 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
0-0 |
Tucson
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
06/24/23 |
Tucson
|
2-2 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
0-1 | 18 - 13 | 5- 3 | 48 - 41 | 2 - 0 |
0 (34%) 11 (1%) |
160 | 250 | 125 | |
05/26/23 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
4-0 |
Tucson
|
2-0 | 0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (1%) 11 (59%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Tucson Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19.7 |
Tucson
|
3 - 2 |
Flatirons Rush
|
0-0 | 19 - 12 | 8 - 3 | 39 - 51 | 5 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
170 | 275 | 115 | |
14.7 |
Tucson
|
1 - 1 |
Coachella
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
9.7 |
Tucson
|
2 - 0 |
AMSG
|
1-0 | 24 - 8 | 8 - 1 | 66 - 23 | 8 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-208 | 310 | 400 | |
7.7 |
Seahorses
|
2 - 3 |
Tucson
|
1-1 | 13 - 16 | 4 - 6 | 25 - 53 | 2 - 3 |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
4000 | 1400 | -2500 | |
3.7 |
Tucson
|
0 - 0 |
Arizona Arsenal
|
0-0 | 20 - 16 | 4 - 2 | 57 - 32 | 5 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-238 | 450 | 333 | |
28.6 |
Tucson
|
2 - 1 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Ventura County Fusion Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19.7 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
2 - 1 |
Albion Colorado
|
0-0 | 12 - 7 | 1 - 2 | 43 - 50 | 4 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-208 | 333 | 375 | |
14.7 |
AMSG
|
2 - 3 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
0-1 | 7 - 18 | 5 - 8 | 57 - 63 | 8 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
375 | 290 | -182 | |
11.7 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
3 - 0 |
Redlands
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
5.7 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
2 - 0 |
Capo II
|
1-0 | 15 - 12 | 7 - 2 | 63 - 50 | 2 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-556 | 550 | 800 | |
30.6 |
Arizona Arsenal
|
0 - 1 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
28.6 |
Tucson
|
2 - 1 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 25:14 | 25 |
|
2.38 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
2. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 23:17 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 1.8 | 4.2 | 73% | 73% | 3.33 |
3. | RKC | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 21:16 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 42% | 1.2 | 3.9 | 100% | 75% | 3.08 |
4. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 23:18 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 58% | 1.1 | 1.8 | 50% | 38% | 3.42 |
5. | Minneapolis City | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 11:18 | 15 |
|
1.50 | 25% | 0.7 | 3.6 | 50% | 38% | 2.42 |
6. | Rochester | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9:29 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 100% | 100% | 3.17 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39:16 | 33 |
|
2.38 | 64% | 0.4 | 2.9 | 50% | 50% | 3.93 |
2. | Midwest United | 14 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28:13 | 31 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 0.1 | 1.1 | 70% | 50% | 2.93 |
3. | Kalamazoo FC | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 37:15 | 27 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 0.6 | 2.0 | 80% | 80% | 3.71 |
4. | AFC Ann Arbor | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 29:18 | 26 |
|
2.25 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.6 | 68% | 68% | 3.36 |
5. | Oakland County | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 16:26 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 43% | 0.5 | 3.4 | 58% | 46% | 3.00 |
6. | Lansing City | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 20:25 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 36% | 0.4 | 1.7 | 42% | 25% | 3.21 |
7. | Union Macomb | 14 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21:28 | 13 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.9 | 2.4 | 75% | 63% | 3.50 |
8. | South Bend Lions | 14 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6:55 | 2 |
|
0.00 | 29% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 68% | 68% | 4.36 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 37:10 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.9 | 0.8 | 88% | 50% | 3.92 |
2. | Peoria | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 35:13 | 27 |
|
2.13 | 58% | 0.8 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
3. | River Light | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 26:20 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 3.8 | 83% | 73% | 3.83 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 37:20 | 21 |
|
1.63 | 83% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
5. | Sueno | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 20:32 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 73% | 0.5 | 1.6 | 100% | 100% | 4.73 |
6. | Chicago City | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 14:28 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 64% | 1.4 | 4.1 | 90% | 80% | 3.82 |
7. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 5:51 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 42% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 100% | 90% | 4.67 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 20:10 | 26 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 58% | 58% | 2.50 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 22:19 | 20 |
|
1.25 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.42 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18:14 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 58% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 25% | 25% | 2.67 |
4. | Buffalo | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 36:23 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 88% | 88% | 4.92 |
5. | Kings Hammer | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 14:19 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 63% | 25% | 2.75 |
6. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5:30 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |