Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Austria - Landesliga: Tirol - 04/09/22 11:30 - 19.Round
2-2 [90‘]
2-2 [90‘]
HT | ||
2-2 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Lineups
Union Innsbruck
-
Union Innsbruck have good form in the last 5 games
Coach J. Pranter can be satisfied with his team form (4W, 0D, 1L) from the last 5 games.
Silz / Mötz
-
Good results in last away matches for Silz / Mötz
Away matches are always difficult but the Silz / Mötz is currently in good form within the last 5 away games. With form record (3W, 1D, 1L)
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/28/21 |
Silz / Mötz
|
5-0 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
09/25/20 |
Silz / Mötz
|
4-1 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
09/28/19 |
Silz / Mötz
|
3-0 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Union Innsbruck Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 |
Kirchbichl
|
1 - 2 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
27.3 |
Union Innsbruck
|
3 - 1 |
Prutz / Serfaus
|
3-1 | 10 - 12 | 5 - 6 | 50 - 54 | 8 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
155 | 300 | 110 | |
19.3 |
Union Innsbruck
|
0 - 3 |
Innsbrucker AC
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.10 |
Vils
|
2 - 2 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
23.10 |
Zams
|
0 - 3 |
Union Innsbruck
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
17.10 |
Union Innsbruck
|
5 - 2 |
Zirl
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Silz / Mötz Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
Prutz / Serfaus
|
2 - 1 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
27.3 |
Münster
|
1 - 6 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
18.3 |
Zirl
|
0 - 4 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.10 |
Stans
|
0 - 2 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
23.10 |
St. Johann in Tirol
|
0 - 0 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.10 |
Volders
|
2 - 3 |
Silz / Mötz
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Tirol | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Silz / Mötz | 30 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 85:41 | 62 |
|
1.75 | 70% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 93% | 83% | 4.20 |
2. | Kundl | 30 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 58:34 | 63 |
|
2.25 | 40% | 0.3 | 1.1 | 79% | 65% | 3.07 |
3. | Kematen | 30 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 66:43 | 56 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 83% | 77% | 3.63 |
4. | Mils | 30 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 89:48 | 57 |
|
1.63 | 67% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 96% | 86% | 4.57 |
5. | Innsbrucker AC | 30 | 17 | 1 | 12 | 72:43 | 52 |
|
1.88 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 93% | 72% | 3.83 |
6. | Völs | 30 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 54:35 | 52 |
|
2.13 | 53% | 0.2 | 0.5 | 77% | 53% | 2.97 |
7. | Ebbs | 30 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 57:40 | 51 |
|
2.00 | 53% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 80% | 60% | 3.23 |
8. | Prutz / Serfaus | 30 | 13 | 5 | 12 | 53:49 | 44 |
|
2.00 | 53% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 80% | 70% | 3.40 |
9. | Union Innsbruck | 30 | 13 | 5 | 12 | 63:66 | 44 |
|
2.63 | 70% | 0.4 | 1.1 | 97% | 87% | 4.30 |
10. | Münster | 30 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 58:56 | 40 |
|
1.50 | 53% | 0.1 | 0.0 | 83% | 67% | 3.80 |
11. | St. Johann in Tirol | 30 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 47:49 | 37 |
|
0.88 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 87% | 63% | 3.20 |
12. | Kirchbichl | 30 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 42:54 | 37 |
|
0.75 | 47% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 80% | 60% | 3.20 |
13. | Natters | 30 | 11 | 2 | 17 | 44:61 | 35 |
|
1.13 | 60% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 79% | 66% | 3.50 |
14. | Volders | 30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 38:54 | 32 |
|
0.75 | 67% | 0.4 | 0.8 | 77% | 53% | 3.07 |
15. | Zirl | 30 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 18:103 | 14 |
|
0.25 | 37% | 0.1 | 0.2 | 86% | 73% | 4.03 |
16. | Zams | 30 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 14:82 | 5 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 73% | 60% | 3.20 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
No data | |
TFV Cup
vs SVG Reichenau 04/18/22
|
3rd Round |