Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Serie D - 05/25/19 18:00 - 4.Round
1-1 [90+60‘]
1-1 [90+60‘]
33‘ |
Alan
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
Eder
Mosquito
|
46‘ | |
53‘ |
Rosinei
César
|
|
58‘ |
0-1
Alan
|
|
Luan
|
60‘ | |
Fernando
Leone
|
61‘ | |
68‘ |
Edson
|
|
(Penalty)
Balotelli
[1-1]
|
72‘ | |
75‘ |
Unknown
Max
|
|
Marquinhos
Marcus
|
75‘ | |
78‘ |
Pires
|
|
78‘ |
Tozim
Caihame
|
|
Bruno
|
81‘ | |
85‘ |
Unknown
|
|
90‘+1 |
Edson
|
|
Luan
|
90‘+3 | |
1-1 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -137 | 260 | 350 | ||
Pre match odds | -137 | 260 | 350 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | -125 | 100 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Sinop
Status: Confirmed lineup
Palmas
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Sinop
Palmas
-
No fresh injuries, same starting lineup?
The coach can use same last starting lineup as there are not reported major missings for this match.
-
The coach has to deal with 3 fresh missings
According to the news, the team is without 3 fresh missing. These players join the missing list: Guimarães, Bala, João.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/18/19 |
Palmas
|
1-1 |
Sinop
|
1-0 | 18 - 10 | 11- 4 | 35 - 31 | 4 - 3 |
5 (33%) 2 (51%) |
175 | 225 | 125 |
Team form
Sinop Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18.5 |
Palmas
|
1 - 1 |
Sinop
|
1-0 | 18 - 10 | 11 - 4 | 35 - 31 | 4 - 3 |
5 (33%) 2 (51%) |
175 | 225 | 125 | |
12.5 |
Sinop
|
1 - 1 |
Corumbaense
|
0-0 | 8 - 4 | 4 - 1 | 59 - 32 | 6 - 4 |
0 (48%) 0 (47%) |
-200 | 275 | 525 | |
5.5 |
Iporá
|
0 - 2 |
Sinop
|
0-2 | 13 - 10 | 2 - 3 | 62 - 46 | 5 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
27.3 |
Luverdense
|
1 - 0 |
Sinop
|
1-0 | 13 - 4 | 1 - 2 | 62 - 24 | 6 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-200 | 280 | 450 | |
24.3 |
Sinop
|
0 - 0 |
Luverdense
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
20.3 |
Sinop
|
2 - 2 |
Dom Bosco
|
2-1 | 4 - 18 | 3 - 8 | 21 - 36 | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
100 | 225 | 250 |
Palmas Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.5 |
Atlético Cerrado
|
0 - 4 |
Palmas
|
20 - 15 | 6 - 7 | 43 - 39 | 7 - 5 |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
18.5 |
Palmas
|
1 - 1 |
Sinop
|
1-0 | 18 - 10 | 11 - 4 | 35 - 31 | 4 - 3 |
5 (33%) 2 (51%) |
175 | 225 | 125 | |
15.5 |
Interporto
|
2 - 0 |
Palmas
|
19 - 18 | 13 - 10 | 44 - 45 | 5 - 5 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11.5 |
Palmas
|
0 - 0 |
Iporá
|
0-0 | 22 - 7 | 8 - 5 | 53 - 32 | 9 - 3 |
1 (45%) 1 (78%) |
138 | 220 | 170 | |
4.5 |
Corumbaense
|
3 - 2 |
Palmas
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
30.4 |
Palmas
|
1 - 2 |
Força Jovem
|
0-1 | 17 - 10 | 4 - 4 | 44 - 42 | 7 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-500 | 475 | 850 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Cup situation
Competitions | |
---|---|
Matogrossense
vs Araguaia 01/21/20
|
1st Round |
Copa Verde
vs Costa Rica - MS 08/08/19
|
1st Round |
Competitions | |
---|---|
Copa do Brasil
vs Paraná 02/05/20
|
1st Round |