Preview match
MATCH REPORT
United States - USL League Two - 07/16/24 19:00
1-0 [75‘]
1-0 [75‘]
HT | ||
1-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Lineups
Vermont Green
-
Vermont Green have good form in the last 5 games
Coach Adam Pfeifer can be satisfied with his team form (4W, 0D, 1L) from the last 5 games.
-
Good form in the last 5 home games for Vermont Green
In the last 5 games at the Bulldog Field form record is (3W, 1D, 1L) which is a reward for Vermont Green fans with 0 average home attendance.
Reading United
-
Reading United have good form in the last 5 games
Coach Alan McCann can be satisfied with his team form (3W, 2D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (5) for Reading United
Reading United are unbeaten in their last 5 USL League Two games (3W, 2D). Players scored 13 goals and 6 conceded in that run.
-
Unbeaten run (3) in last away games
Reading United are unbeaten in their last 3 USL League Two away games (2W, 1D). Players scored 10 goals and 4 conceded in that run.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Team form
Vermont Green Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.7 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
1 - 3 |
Vermont Green
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
7.7 |
Vermont Green
|
1 - 2 |
Seacoast United Phantoms
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (1%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
30.6 |
Pathfinder
|
0 - 3 |
Vermont Green
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (1%) |
- | - | - | |
26.6 |
Vermont Green
|
5 - 0 |
Boston City
|
2-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (1%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.6 |
AC Connecticut
|
1 - 2 |
Vermont Green
|
0-1 | 12 - 18 | 5 - 5 | 51 - 100 | 0 - 9 |
0 (0%) 11 (1%) |
550 | 375 | -278 | |
15.6 |
Vermont Green
|
0 - 0 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (1%) 11 (1%) |
- | - | - |
Reading United Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.7 |
Reading United
|
2 - 1 |
Lehigh Valley Utd. Sonic
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
10.7 |
Real Central New Jersey
|
1 - 6 |
Reading United
|
0-2 | 0 - 8 | 0 - 4 | 88 - 75 | 7 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
250 | 320 | -143 | |
7.7 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
1 - 2 |
Reading United
|
0-1 | 2 - 8 | 1 - 5 | 79 - 87 | 4 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-200 | 300 | 425 | |
29.6 |
Reading United
|
1 - 1 |
Real Central New Jersey
|
0-0 | 5 - 2 | 2 - 1 | 89 - 64 | 6 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-164 | 333 | 280 | |
26.6 |
Lehigh Valley Utd. Sonic
|
2 - 2 |
Reading United
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
900 | 550 | -588 | |
22.6 |
Lone Star II
|
4 - 3 |
Reading United
|
1-3 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 25:14 | 25 |
|
2.38 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
2. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 23:17 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 1.8 | 4.2 | 73% | 73% | 3.33 |
3. | RKC | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 21:16 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 42% | 1.2 | 3.9 | 100% | 75% | 3.08 |
4. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 23:18 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 58% | 1.1 | 1.8 | 50% | 38% | 3.42 |
5. | Minneapolis City | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 11:18 | 15 |
|
1.50 | 25% | 0.7 | 3.6 | 50% | 38% | 2.42 |
6. | Rochester | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9:29 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 100% | 100% | 3.17 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39:16 | 33 |
|
2.38 | 64% | 0.4 | 2.9 | 50% | 50% | 3.93 |
2. | Midwest United | 14 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28:13 | 31 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 0.1 | 1.1 | 70% | 50% | 2.93 |
3. | Kalamazoo FC | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 37:15 | 27 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 0.6 | 2.0 | 80% | 80% | 3.71 |
4. | AFC Ann Arbor | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 29:18 | 26 |
|
2.25 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.6 | 68% | 68% | 3.36 |
5. | Oakland County | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 16:26 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 43% | 0.5 | 3.4 | 58% | 46% | 3.00 |
6. | Lansing City | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 20:25 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 36% | 0.4 | 1.7 | 42% | 25% | 3.21 |
7. | Union Macomb | 14 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21:28 | 13 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.9 | 2.4 | 75% | 63% | 3.50 |
8. | South Bend Lions | 14 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6:55 | 2 |
|
0.00 | 29% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 68% | 68% | 4.36 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 37:10 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.9 | 0.8 | 88% | 50% | 3.92 |
2. | Peoria | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 35:13 | 27 |
|
2.13 | 58% | 0.8 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
3. | River Light | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 26:20 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 3.8 | 83% | 73% | 3.83 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 37:20 | 21 |
|
1.63 | 83% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
5. | Sueno | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 20:32 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 73% | 0.5 | 1.6 | 100% | 100% | 4.73 |
6. | Chicago City | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 14:28 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 64% | 1.4 | 4.1 | 90% | 80% | 3.82 |
7. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 5:51 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 42% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 100% | 90% | 4.67 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 20:10 | 26 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 58% | 58% | 2.50 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 22:19 | 20 |
|
1.25 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.42 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18:14 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 58% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 25% | 25% | 2.67 |
4. | Buffalo | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 36:23 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 88% | 88% | 4.92 |
5. | Kings Hammer | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 14:19 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 58% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 63% | 25% | 2.75 |
6. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5:30 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |