Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 12/19/20 07:00
1-2 [90‘]
1-2 [90‘]
Abdi Qara
[1-0]
|
45‘ | |
45‘+4 |
1-1
Negao
|
|
45‘+4 |
Negao
(Missed penalty)
|
|
1-1 HT | ||
55‘ |
[1-2]
Negao
(Penalty)
|
|
72‘ |
Hong
Park
|
|
72‘ |
Lee
Lee
|
|
Shiri
Ramezani
|
74‘ | |
79‘ |
Bulthuis
|
|
83‘ |
Jung
Negao
|
|
83‘ |
Negao
|
|
83‘ |
Johnsen
Sin
|
|
Alishah
Shojaei
|
90‘ | |
90‘+1 |
Seol
Kim
|
|
1-2 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 2 0
ODDS
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Persepolis
Status: Confirmed lineup
Ulsan
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Persepolis
-
Unbeaten run (4) for Persepolis
Persepolis are unbeaten in their last 4 AFC Champions League games (3W, 1D). Players scored 8 goals and 1 conceded in that run.
-
Good form in the last 5 home games for Persepolis
In the last 5 games at the Al Janoub Stadium form record is (4W, 0D, 1L) which is a reward for Persepolis fans with 0 average home attendance.
-
Unbeaten run (3) at home stadium
Persepolis are unbeaten in their last 3 home games in AFC Champions League (3W, 0D). Players scored 7 goals and 0 conceded in that run.
-
Abdi Qara is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Mehdi Abdi Qara (5 matches, 3 goals, 0 assists) is back after his missing.
Ulsan
-
Ulsan have good form in the last 5 games
Coach D. Kim can be satisfied with his team form (5W, 0D, 0L) from the last 5 games.
-
Unbeaten run (9) for Ulsan
Ulsan are unbeaten in their last 9 AFC Champions League games (8W, 1D). Players scored 19 goals and 6 conceded in that run.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Team form
Persepolis Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.11 |
Persepolis
|
3 - 0 |
Padideh Khorasan
|
1-0 | 13 - 4 | 5 - 3 | 52 - 34 | 2 - 1 |
2 (63%) 3 (52%) |
-137 | 180 | 550 | |
26.11 |
Naft Masjed Soleyman
|
0 - 0 |
Persepolis
|
0-0 | 6 - 6 | 2 - 1 | 50 - 67 | 5 - 2 |
2 (27%) 2 (70%) |
600 | 240 | -182 | |
21.11 |
Persepolis
|
1 - 0 |
Sanat Naft
|
1-0 | 12 - 2 | 4 - 0 | 71 - 34 | 3 - 1 |
2 (70%) 6 (28%) |
-189 | 240 | 550 | |
6.11 |
Saipa
|
0 - 0 |
Persepolis
|
0-0 | 4 - 15 | 1 - 5 | 28 - 55 | 5 - 8 |
6 (42%) 2 (66%) |
280 | 210 | -110 | |
3.10 |
Al Nassr
|
1 - 1 |
Persepolis
|
1-1 | 14 - 8 | 2 - 1 | 67 - 53 | 2 - 4 |
0 (71%) 1 (78%) |
- | - | - | |
30.9 |
Persepolis
|
2 - 0 |
Pakhtakor
|
0-0 | 7 - 5 | 1 - 3 | 81 - 57 | 5 - 5 |
1 (76%) 0 (66%) |
- | - | - |
Ulsan Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.12 |
Ulsan
|
2 - 1 |
Vissel Kobe
|
1-1 | 18 - 11 | 7 - 4 | 92 - 91 | 7 - 7 |
4 (56%) 0 (63%) |
- | - | - | |
10.12 |
Ulsan
|
2 - 0 |
Beijing Guoan
|
2-0 | 5 - 20 | 4 - 8 | 49 - 74 | 3 - 5 |
4 (50%) 0 (43%) |
- | - | - | |
6.12 |
Ulsan
|
1 - 0 |
Melbourne Victory
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
11 (49%) 2 (47%) |
- | - | - | |
3.12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
1 - 4 |
Ulsan
|
0-2 | 7 - 11 | 4 - 6 | 40 - 60 | 1 - 1 |
5 (57%) 10 (20%) |
180 | 240 | 120 | |
30.11 |
Tokyo
|
1 - 2 |
Ulsan
|
1-1 | 5 - 14 | 2 - 5 | 40 - 69 | 0 - 8 |
3 (69%) 6 (51%) |
200 | 230 | 130 | |
27.11 |
Ulsan
|
2 - 0 |
Perth Glory
|
0-0 | 17 - 4 | 5 - 2 | 64 - 21 | 9 - 5 |
7 (26%) 8 (21%) |
-303 | 425 | 700 |
Standings
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Ahli | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4:6 | 6 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.50 |
2. | Esteghlal | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 100% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Shorta | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 75% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Wahda | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 50% | - | - | 50% | 0% | 0 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.0 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
2. | Al Hilal | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6:2 | 11 |
|
2.20 | 40% | 0.6 | 5.4 | 67% | 42% | 1.60 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4:4 | 7 |
|
1.40 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 42% | 42% | 1.60 |
4. | Padideh Khorasan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0:8 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 33% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.17 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Taawoun | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.5 | 83% | 83% | 4.00 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 83% | 33% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 3.67 |
3. | Sepahan | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 83% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Ain | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12:4 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Melbourne Victory | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 2.5 | 4.0 | 67% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Seoul | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 83% | 83% | 3.17 |
4. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 100% | 67% | 3.17 |
2. | Tokyo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
3. | Shanghai Shenhua | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 83% | 83% | 3.67 |
4. | Perth Glory | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5:11 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Vissel Kobe | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9:6 | 9 |
|
1.80 | 100% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 75% | 42% | 3.00 |
2. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Suwon Bluewings | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 50% | 17% | 1.60 |
4. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
1.50 | 100% | 3.5 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Yokohama F. Marinos | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
2. | Shanghai Port | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.7 | 0.2 | 83% | 67% | 2.67 |
3. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
4. | Sydney | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |