Preview match
United States - WPSL - 06/29/24 18:00
Stadium
Capacity
0
Surface
Referee
ODDS
Lineups
New York Shockers W
-
Bad results in last matches for New York Shockers W
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach as the form record is (1W, 1D, 3L) with their average of 2.8 goals conceded per game.
-
3 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for New York Shockers W. Coach can not be satisfied with 3 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
-
Bad results in last matches for Merrimack Valley Hawks W
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach as the form record is (1W, 1D, 3L) with their average of 2.8 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
1
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
0
0
FORM
0.67
0.67
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
0.33
0
Team Strength
Head to head
100%
0%
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/01/24 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
3-4 |
New York Shockers W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
0.33
0.67 (+103%) total
0.67 (+0%) total
0.00
New York Shockers W Last 6 Matches
6.7 |
Rhode Island Rogues W
|
18:00 |
New York Shockers W
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23.6 |
Force New York W
|
1 - 0 |
New York Shockers W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.6 |
New York Shockers W
|
1 - 3 |
Clarkstown W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
9.6 |
Clarkstown W
|
4 - 1 |
New York Shockers W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
1.6 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
3 - 4 |
New York Shockers W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
24.5 |
New York Shockers W
|
3 - 3 |
Force New York W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
18.5 |
New York Shockers W
|
1 - 5 |
Rhode Island Rogues W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W Last 6 Matches
6.7 |
Force New York W
|
17:00 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22.6 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
2 - 2 |
Rhode Island Rogues W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.6 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
0 - 1 |
Clarkstown W
|
0-1 | 5 - 10 | 0 - 4 | 51 - 48 | 4 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.6 |
Clarkstown W
|
7 - 0 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
2.6 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
2 - 0 |
Force New York W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
1.6 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
3 - 4 |
New York Shockers W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
25.5 |
Rhode Island Rogues W
|
4 - 1 |
Merrimack Valley Hawks W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
East | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Great Lakes Great River | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Columbus Eagles W | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 21:7 | 17 |
|
2.43 | 29% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.00 |
2. | Ambassadors Cleveland W | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16:7 | 13 |
|
2.60 | 60% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.60 |
3. | Beadling W | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 10 |
|
1.43 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.14 |
4. | Corktown W | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 14:19 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 75% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
5. | Greater Toledo W | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5:19 | 3 |
|
0.43 | 43% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
Great Lakes Lake Erie | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Niagara 1812 W | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13:8 | 13 |
|
1.86 | 43% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Rochester New York W | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Cleveland Ambassadors W | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 18:11 | 9 |
|
1.29 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
4. | BC United NY W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
5. | Erie W | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2:18 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Metropolitan | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | SUSA W | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 23:7 | 21 |
|
2.63 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
2. | Downtown United W | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22:4 | 16 |
|
2.29 | 43% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
3. | STA W | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
4. | Brooklyn City W | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5:8 | 10 |
|
1.43 | 29% | 0.0 | 0.9 | 50% | 38% | 1.86 |
5. | New York Athletic W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 58% | 58% | 3.50 |
6. | NJ Wizards Cedar Stars W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7:20 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.50 |
7. | New York Dutch Lions W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:26 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
Mid-Atlantic Colonial | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Penn Fusion SA W | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 20:11 | 15 |
|
2.14 | 86% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.43 |
2. | Real Central NJ W | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 26:12 | 13 |
|
1.63 | 63% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
3. | CAFC Ospreys W | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 21:11 | 13 |
|
1.86 | 86% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.57 |
4. | SJEB W | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 10:8 | 12 |
|
1.71 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
5. | Philly Fever W | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8:14 | 8 |
|
1.00 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
6. | Philadelphia Ukrainians W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
7. | West-Mont United W | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6:31 | 1 |
|
0.14 | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.29 |
Mid-Atlantic Commonwealth | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Reading United W | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 22:13 | 17 |
|
1.75 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
2. | PA Classics W | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19:9 | 16 |
|
2.29 | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.00 |
3. | Keystone W | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 22:9 | 15 |
|
2.14 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.43 |
4. | Lehigh Valley Tempest W | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 16:14 | 15 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
5. | Hershey W | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7:23 | 4 |
|
0.50 | 56% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
6. | LVU Rush W | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5:23 | 2 |
|
0.25 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
Northeastern | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Clarkstown W | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 22:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
2. | Rhode Island Rogues W | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 21:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
3. | New York Shockers W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10:19 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.83 |
4. | Merrimack Valley Hawks W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8:18 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
5. | Force New York W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:18 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Cup situation
Competitions |
---|
Competitions |
---|