Preview match
MATCH REPORT
England - Counties Leagues: Southern Combination League Premier - 10/26/24 10:00
2-0 [75‘]
2-0 [75‘]
HT | ||
2-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Lineups
Haywards Heath Town
-
Haywards Heath Town have good form in the last 5 games
Coach can be satisfied with his team form (4W, 0D, 1L) from the last 5 games.
-
Good form in the last 5 home games for Haywards Heath Town
In the last 5 games at the Hanbury Park form record is (5W, 0D, 0L) which is a reward for Haywards Heath Town fans with 0 average home attendance.
-
Unbeaten run (8) at home stadium
Haywards Heath Town are unbeaten in their last 8 home games in Counties Leagues: Southern Combination League Premier (6W, 2D). Players scored 17 goals and 2 conceded in that run.
Lingfield
-
Bad results in last matches for Lingfield
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach as the form record is (0W, 2D, 3L) with their average of 1.8 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (12) matches
Lingfield have fail to win 12 matches in a row.
-
Poor form in away games
3 losses in 5 games. (0W, 2D, 3L) is the record in away games. With their average of 2 goals conceded per game.
-
Tuesday: FA Vase (1st Round)
Lingfield is playing against Billingshurst an important FA Vase game (1st Round - 1/1)
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/23/24 |
Lingfield
|
0-2 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
10/07/23 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
2-1 |
Lingfield
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Team form
Haywards Heath Town Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18.10 |
Faversham Strike Force
|
1 - 2 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
12.10 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
9 - 1 |
Saltdean United
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
8.10 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
0 - 0 |
Midhurst & Easebourne
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
5.10 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
1 - 0 |
Shoreham
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
2.10 |
Bexhill United
|
1 - 0 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.9 |
Haywards Heath Town
|
1 - 0 |
Horsham YMCA
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Lingfield Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.10 |
Petersfield Town
|
1 - 1 |
Lingfield
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
5.10 |
Lingfield
|
1 - 3 |
Crawley Down Gatwick
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.9 |
Lingfield
|
1 - 2 |
Wick
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
25.9 |
Bexhill United
|
1 - 1 |
Lingfield
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.9 |
Varndeanians
|
2 - 1 |
Lingfield
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
14.9 |
Lingfield
|
3 - 3 |
Pagham
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standings
Southern Combination League Premier | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Hassocks | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 37:12 | 36 |
|
2.38 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
2. | Haywards Heath Town | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 30:5 | 35 |
|
2.38 | 25% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.19 |
3. | Roffey | 17 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 30:13 | 30 |
|
2.13 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
4. | Petersfield Town | 16 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 26:17 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
5. | Bexhill United | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 33:16 | 31 |
|
2.50 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
6. | Crawley Down Gatwick | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 33:24 | 26 |
|
1.38 | 63% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
7. | Crowborough Athletic | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 32:15 | 26 |
|
2.38 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.94 |
8. | Peacehaven & Telscombe | 16 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 25:20 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.81 |
9. | Midhurst & Easebourne | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 15:21 | 21 |
|
1.38 | 31% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.25 |
10. | Eastbourne United | 16 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 17:18 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 44% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.19 |
11. | Varndeanians | 17 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 24:31 | 24 |
|
1.13 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.24 |
12. | Newhaven | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 16:21 | 21 |
|
1.00 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.31 |
13. | Wick | 16 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 19:32 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 63% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.19 |
14. | Horsham YMCA | 16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 19:22 | 15 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.56 |
15. | Loxwood | 17 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 15:45 | 13 |
|
0.38 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
16. | Pagham | 16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 18:22 | 15 |
|
0.88 | 44% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
17. | Shoreham | 16 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16:25 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.56 |
18. | Lingfield | 16 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 17:28 | 10 |
|
0.63 | 69% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.81 |
19. | Saltdean United | 17 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 20:34 | 14 |
|
0.38 | 53% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.18 |
20. | Little Common | 16 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 11:32 | 8 |
|
0.38 | 44% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |