Preview match
MATCH REPORT
China PR - Super League - 06/30/22 07:30 - 7.Round
2-1 [90‘]
2-1 [90‘]
(Penalty)
Wei
[1-0]
|
6‘ | |
18‘ |
Jinghang
|
|
1-0 HT | ||
49‘ |
Ming
|
|
Ziye
|
49‘ | |
Ziye
Xu
|
54‘ | |
73‘ |
1-1
Ming
|
|
76‘ |
Jinghang
|
|
Yunan
Liu
|
78‘ | |
Yao
Wei
|
78‘ | |
Xintao
|
79‘ | |
Wei
[2-1]
|
87‘ | |
90‘ |
Viana
|
|
2-1 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 1 0
CARDS 3 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | 1400 | 425 | -400 | ||
Pre match odds | 800 | 333 | -250 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
+1.25 | -112 | -112 | -1.25 |
+1.5 | -139 | 120 | -1.5 |
+1 | 125 | -161 | -1 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | -118 | -105 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
8 | 115 | -147 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Hebei CFFC
Status: Confirmed lineup
Wuhan Yangtze
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Hebei CFFC
-
Wei is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Zhang Wei (22 matches, 6 goals, 1 assists) is back after his missing.
-
Bad results in last matches for Hebei CFFC
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach J. Kim as the form record is (0W, 0D, 5L) with their average of 2.6 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (6) matches
Hebei CFFC have fail to win 6 matches in a row.
-
6 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Hebei CFFC. Coach J. Kim can not be satisfied with 6 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Wuhan Yangtze
-
Second absence for Xiaoyi Cao
Coach J. Li is still without his key player Xiaoyi Cao (1 matches, 0 goals, 0 assists). Reason: not available.
-
Bad results in last matches for Wuhan Yangtze
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach J. Li as the form record is (2W, 0D, 3L) with their average of 1.6 goals conceded per game.
-
3 games lost in row. Time to tactic change?
Bad period for Wuhan Yangtze. Coach J. Li can not be satisfied with 3 games losing streak. It is highly possible that the coach will make a tactical change.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/07/22 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
2-1 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1-0 | 8 - 9 | 4- 4 | 47 - 16 | 3 - 2 |
0 (21%) 3 (33%) |
-455 | 475 | 1400 | |
08/15/21 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
1-1 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1-1 | 7 - 5 | 2- 2 | 42 - 34 | 3 - 1 |
1 (60%) 1 (61%) |
210 | 220 | 120 | |
04/23/21 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1-1 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
0-0 | 8 - 9 | 5- 4 | 29 - 37 | 7 - 7 |
6 (38%) 9 (31%) |
210 | 210 | 140 | |
09/25/20 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
0-2 |
Hebei CFFC
|
0-1 | 9 - 11 | 1- 4 | 52 - 30 | 7 - 5 |
5 (50%) 2 (48%) |
250 | 260 | 100 | |
09/19/20 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
1-1 |
Hebei CFFC
|
0-1 | 6 - 7 | 4- 2 | 65 - 48 | 5 - 4 |
8 (3%) 9 (8%) |
210 | 260 | 105 | |
08/21/20 |
Hebei CFFC
|
3-1 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
2-1 | 13 - 7 | 5- 4 | 35 - 49 | 3 - 7 |
0 (22%) 2 (25%) |
120 | 240 | 220 |
Team form
Hebei CFFC Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.6 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
5 - 0 |
Hebei CFFC
|
3-0 | 30 - 5 | 11 - 2 | 50 - 16 | 10 - 0 |
5 (37%) 2 (50%) |
-1250 | 900 | 2800 | |
19.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1 - 0 |
Hebei CFFC
|
0-0 | 12 - 3 | 3 - 2 | 39 - 41 | 5 - 4 |
2 (31%) 3 (50%) |
-110 | 225 | 350 | |
16.6 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1 - 3 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
0-0 | 5 - 21 | 2 - 3 | 17 - 68 | 4 - 7 |
5 (38%) 7 (36%) |
1200 | 550 | -455 | |
11.6 |
Hebei CFFC
|
0 - 2 |
Shanghai Port
|
0-1 | 3 - 11 | 0 - 4 | 10 - 40 | 0 - 5 |
1 (40%) 2 (41%) |
1100 | 350 | -303 | |
7.6 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
2 - 1 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1-0 | 8 - 9 | 4 - 4 | 47 - 16 | 3 - 2 |
0 (21%) 3 (33%) |
-455 | 475 | 1400 | |
3.6 |
Hebei CFFC
|
0 - 4 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
0-2 | 3 - 30 | 3 - 4 | 6 - 79 | 2 - 14 |
8 (27%) 8 (25%) |
1800 | 850 | -909 |
Wuhan Yangtze Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25.6 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
1 - 2 |
Shanghai Port
|
0-1 | 11 - 13 | 4 - 4 | 23 - 50 | 1 - 8 |
3 (36%) 3 (48%) |
550 | 320 | -200 | |
20.6 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
2 - 0 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
1-0 | 23 - 4 | 2 - 0 | 63 - 29 | 6 - 2 |
2 (42%) 2 (34%) |
-105 | 240 | 300 | |
15.6 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
1 - 3 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
0-2 | 3 - 19 | 3 - 8 | 33 - 46 | 2 - 4 |
2 (31%) 4 (41%) |
350 | 280 | -137 | |
11.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 1 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
0-0 | 8 - 10 | 1 - 5 | 46 - 62 | 3 - 4 |
4 (20%) 2 (21%) |
750 | 375 | -250 | |
7.6 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
2 - 1 |
Hebei CFFC
|
1-0 | 8 - 9 | 4 - 4 | 47 - 16 | 3 - 2 |
0 (21%) 3 (33%) |
-455 | 475 | 1400 | |
4.6 |
Shanghai Port
|
0 - 1 |
Wuhan Yangtze
|
0-0 | 5 - 11 | 3 - 3 | 37 - 43 | 4 - 6 |
6 (37%) 10 (15%) |
120 | 200 | 275 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Wuhan Three Towns | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 91:28 | 78 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.5 | 5.4 | 88% | 74% | 3.50 |
2. | Shandong Taishan | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 87:29 | 78 |
|
2.00 | 44% | 1.4 | 6.0 | 91% | 68% | 3.41 |
3. | Chengdu Rongcheng | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 49:28 | 65 |
|
2.50 | 44% | 1.6 | 6.0 | 68% | 44% | 2.26 |
4. | Zhejiang | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 64:28 | 65 |
|
2.38 | 47% | 2.2 | 4.6 | 88% | 41% | 2.71 |
5. | Shanghai Port | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 55:25 | 65 |
|
2.00 | 38% | 1.0 | 5.4 | 71% | 44% | 2.35 |
6. | Beijing Guoan | 34 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 57:49 | 58 |
|
1.50 | 59% | 1.4 | 5.1 | 82% | 71% | 3.12 |
7. | Henan Songshan Longmen | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 60:32 | 59 |
|
1.63 | 47% | 1.9 | 4.7 | 76% | 56% | 2.71 |
8. | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 45:42 | 49 |
|
1.38 | 44% | 1.5 | 4.0 | 71% | 50% | 2.56 |
9. | Meizhou Hakka | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 43:41 | 49 |
|
1.13 | 41% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 59% | 50% | 2.47 |
10. | Shanghai Shenhua | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 42:34 | 53 |
|
1.38 | 53% | 2.0 | 3.8 | 76% | 35% | 2.24 |
11. | Dalian Pro | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 51:50 | 48 |
|
1.88 | 59% | 1.8 | 5.5 | 97% | 65% | 2.97 |
12. | Changchun Yatai | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 49:50 | 44 |
|
1.25 | 53% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 71% | 53% | 2.91 |
13. | Cangzhou | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 47:51 | 44 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 85% | 50% | 2.88 |
14. | Shenzhen | 34 | 9 | 3 | 22 | 29:74 | 30 |
|
0.00 | 41% | 1.4 | 3.6 | 88% | 59% | 3.03 |
15. | Guangzhou R&F | 34 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 29:64 | 20 |
|
1.00 | 44% | 1.8 | 2.9 | 79% | 59% | 2.74 |
16. | Wuhan Yangtze | 34 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 34:71 | 28 |
|
0.88 | 53% | 1.5 | 3.6 | 85% | 76% | 3.09 |
17. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 34 | 3 | 8 | 23 | 24:63 | 17 |
|
0.38 | 47% | 1.9 | 3.5 | 62% | 50% | 2.56 |
18. | Hebei CFFC | 34 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 18:115 | 6 |
|
0.38 | 38% | 1.1 | 2.2 | 85% | 79% | 3.91 |