Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Romania - 3. Liga: Series 1 - 03/18/23 09:00 - 17.Round
3-0 [90‘]
3-0 [90‘]
HT | ||
3-0 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 0 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Lineups
Viitorul Darabani
-
Bad results in last matches for Viitorul Darabani
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach as the form record is (1W, 1D, 3L) with their average of 2.2 goals conceded per game.
-
The form at the home stadium is not good
3 losses in 5 games. (2W, 0D, 3L) is the record at home ground Stadionul Orăşenesc. With their average of 1.4 goals conceded per game.
Dante Botoşani
-
Poor form in away games
3 losses in 5 games. (2W, 0D, 3L) is the record in away games. With their average of 1.6 goals conceded per game.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/15/22 |
Dante Botoşani
|
1-0 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
08/31/22 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
0-3 |
Dante Botoşani
|
1-0 | 11 - 15 | 4- 4 | 46 - 65 | 2 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
475 | 333 | -250 |
Team form
Viitorul Darabani Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.3 |
Csikszereda II
|
1 - 1 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 87 - 76 | 4 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-110 | 260 | 210 | |
3.12 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
5 - 1 |
Rapid Brodoc
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.11 |
Bucovina Radauti
|
4 - 0 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
19.11 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
0 - 1 |
Foresta Suceava
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (8%) |
- | - | - | ||
12.11 |
Ceahlaul Piatra Neamt
|
4 - 1 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
5.11 |
Viitorul Darabani
|
0 - 2 |
CSM Bacău
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Dante Botoşani Last 6 Matches
25.3 |
Dante Botoşani
|
09:00 |
Şomuz Fălticeni
|
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.3 |
Ştiinţa Miroslava
|
3 - 0 |
Dante Botoşani
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-909 | 700 | 1600 | ||
3.12 |
Dante Botoşani
|
2 - 1 |
Csikszereda II
|
2-0 | 12 - 7 | 9 - 4 | 48 - 27 | 6 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-455 | 500 | 700 | |
26.11 |
Rapid Brodoc
|
1 - 3 |
Dante Botoşani
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
19.11 |
Dante Botoşani
|
2 - 2 |
Bucovina Radauti
|
1-0 | 10 - 16 | 6 - 6 | 42 - 43 | 1 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
138 | 220 | 163 | |
12.11 |
Foresta Suceava
|
1 - 0 |
Dante Botoşani
|
1-0 | 14 - 9 | 8 - 5 | 48 - 41 | 7 - 5 |
0 (8%) 0 (0%) |
-400 | 450 | 700 | |
5.11 |
Dante Botoşani
|
3 - 1 |
Ceahlaul Piatra Neamt
|
3-1 | 20 - 7 | 8 - 2 | 51 - 26 | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
150 | 220 | 150 |
Standings
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Foresta Suceava | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 35:10 | 42 |
|
2.13 | 39% | 0.9 | 2.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
2. | Bucovina Radauti | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 38:20 | 35 |
|
2.38 | 44% | 1.1 | 3.7 | 89% | 61% | 3.22 |
3. | Ceahlaul Piatra Neamt | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 40:26 | 30 |
|
1.63 | 67% | 1.2 | 2.1 | 94% | 67% | 3.67 |
4. | CSM Bacău | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 32:21 | 33 |
|
1.88 | 44% | 0.9 | 1.9 | 83% | 50% | 2.94 |
5. | Ştiinţa Miroslava | 18 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 27:20 | 29 |
|
1.75 | 33% | 1.2 | 1.8 | 78% | 56% | 2.61 |
6. | Şomuz Fălticeni | 18 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 28:19 | 27 |
|
1.63 | 44% | 1.4 | 3.2 | 78% | 61% | 2.61 |
7. | Viitorul Darabani | 18 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 18:41 | 16 |
|
0.88 | 39% | 0.2 | 0.1 | 83% | 67% | 3.28 |
8. | Rapid Brodoc | 18 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 17:41 | 11 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 0.8 | 1.1 | 89% | 61% | 3.22 |
9. | Csikszereda II | 18 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 8:39 | 7 |
|
0.13 | 39% | 0.9 | 1.5 | 78% | 39% | 2.61 |
10. | Dante Botoşani | 18 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 23:29 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 22% | 0.9 | 2.1 | 89% | 78% | 2.89 |