Preview match
MATCH REPORT
China PR - League One - 08/09/22 07:30 - 14.Round
3-1 [90‘]
3-1 [90‘]
Vinícius Eberechukwu Uzoukwu
[1-0]
|
27‘ | |
42‘ |
Guo
|
|
1-0 HT | ||
Bu
|
55‘ | |
61‘ |
1-1
Chen
|
|
62‘ |
Tan
Li
|
|
62‘ |
Wang
Ye
|
|
74‘ |
Li
Chen
|
|
74‘ |
Zhang
Liu
|
|
Lei
Yang
|
74‘ | |
Zhongting
|
74‘ | |
Dongxu
|
79‘ | |
82‘ |
Cui
Zheng
|
|
Yang
|
86‘ | |
Yang
[2-1]
|
86‘ | |
Fan
[3-1]
|
90‘+5 | |
3-1 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 3 0
CARDS 1 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -588 | 600 | 800 | ||
Pre match odds | -455 | 475 | 700 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
-1.75 | -109 | -123 | +1.75 |
-1.5 | -139 | 100 | +1.5 |
-2 | 128 | -159 | +2 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | 110 | -143 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Status: Confirmed lineup
BIT
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
-
Bad results in last matches for Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach H. Zang as the form record is (1W, 2D, 2L) with their average of 1.6 goals conceded per game.
BIT
-
Guo is back. Boost for the team
Good news for the team. Key player Mengyuan Guo (21 matches, 2 goals, 0 assists) is back after his missing.
-
Minjie Wang is a fresh missing
Coach F. Yu is without his key player Minjie Wang (20 matches, 1 goals, 0 assists). Reason: not available. His absence can be a big blow for the team.
-
Bad results in last matches for BIT
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach F. Yu as the form record is (0W, 2D, 3L) with their average of 1.2 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (13) matches
BIT have fail to win 13 matches in a row.
-
Poor form in away games
5 losses in 5 games. (0W, 0D, 5L) is the record in away games. With their average of 2.4 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (6) matches in away games
BIT have fail to win 6 matches in a row in away matches.
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/23/22 |
BIT
|
2-2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0-1 | 6 - 10 | 4- 5 | 40 - 68 | 0 - 5 |
0 (17%) 8 (21%) |
2000 | 1000 | -1250 | |
05/31/21 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
3-0 |
BIT
|
0-0 | 15 - 8 | 7- 2 | 52 - 37 | 4 - 7 |
4 (66%) 2 (69%) |
-278 | 320 | 700 | |
05/05/21 |
BIT
|
0-4 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0-1 | 2 - 12 | 1- 6 | 45 - 56 | 3 - 6 |
2 (77%) 3 (66%) |
375 | 230 | -133 |
Team form
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.8 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
2 - 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
2-0 | 2 - 2 | 2 - 2 | 0 - 0 | 5 - 5 |
6 (17%) 3 (25%) |
180 | 225 | 120 | |
1.8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
3 - 0 |
Zibo Sunday
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (20%) 9 (16%) |
-333 | 400 | 750 | ||
28.7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
1 - 4 |
Qingdao Hainiu
|
0-2 | 6 - 16 | 4 - 7 | 50 - 56 | 2 - 8 |
1 (37%) 3 (33%) |
350 | 250 | -143 | |
23.7 |
BIT
|
2 - 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0-1 | 6 - 10 | 4 - 5 | 40 - 68 | 0 - 5 |
0 (17%) 8 (21%) |
2000 | 1000 | -1250 | |
19.7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0 - 0 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
0-0 | 10 - 10 | 2 - 3 | 45 - 56 | 5 - 4 |
4 (21%) 1 (25%) |
-154 | 260 | 333 | |
8.7 |
Shenzhen Peng City
|
0 - 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0-1 | 19 - 8 | 4 - 4 | 99 - 32 | 11 - 4 |
3 (27%) 2 (14%) |
-143 | 275 | 280 |
BIT Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.8 |
BIT
|
0 - 1 |
Zibo Sunday
|
0-0 | 5 - 10 | 0 - 3 | 37 - 65 | 1 - 4 |
4 (16%) 4 (19%) |
750 | 320 | -303 | |
31.7 |
BIT
|
0 - 0 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
0-0 | 6 - 16 | 3 - 3 | 48 - 64 | 3 - 3 |
0 (18%) 5 (6%) |
260 | 225 | -110 | |
27.7 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
1 - 0 |
BIT
|
1-0 | 11 - 4 | 3 - 3 | 81 - 29 | 5 - 1 |
6 (20%) 2 (16%) |
-500 | 500 | 700 | |
23.7 |
BIT
|
2 - 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
0-1 | 6 - 10 | 4 - 5 | 40 - 68 | 0 - 5 |
0 (17%) 8 (21%) |
2000 | 1000 | -1250 | |
19.7 |
Zibo Sunday
|
2 - 0 |
BIT
|
1-0 | 11 - 9 | 3 - 2 | 50 - 48 | 3 - 7 |
2 (24%) 4 (18%) |
-200 | 260 | 475 | |
9.7 |
BIT
|
0 - 4 |
Shaanxi Chang'an
|
0-3 | 5 - 7 | 0 - 5 | 26 - 39 | 0 - 1 |
2 (17%) 5 (32%) |
600 | 375 | -303 |
Standings
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Zhenjiang Huasa | 34 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 80:19 | 89 |
|
2.63 | 47% | 1.5 | 5.1 | 85% | 50% | 2.91 |
2. | Qingdao Hainiu | 34 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 77:24 | 76 |
|
2.50 | 53% | 0.9 | 4.4 | 85% | 50% | 2.97 |
3. | Nantong Zhiyun | 34 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 62:22 | 70 |
|
0.75 | 38% | 1.5 | 5.3 | 71% | 59% | 2.47 |
4. | Shijiazhuang Kungfu | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | 50:31 | 66 |
|
2.00 | 38% | 1.1 | 3.5 | 68% | 41% | 2.38 |
5. | Shaanxi Chang'an | 34 | 18 | 8 | 8 | 55:32 | 62 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 1.6 | 4.4 | 74% | 41% | 2.56 |
6. | Suzhou Dongwu | 34 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 42:33 | 55 |
|
2.13 | 38% | 1.3 | 4.5 | 68% | 50% | 2.21 |
7. | Shenzhen Peng City | 34 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 40:30 | 57 |
|
1.63 | 24% | 1.4 | 5.4 | 71% | 24% | 2.06 |
8. | Nanjing City | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 45:38 | 50 |
|
2.00 | 53% | 1.9 | 4.9 | 71% | 50% | 2.44 |
9. | Qingdao Youth Island | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 47:44 | 48 |
|
1.75 | 59% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 74% | 53% | 2.68 |
10. | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 34 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 48:48 | 46 |
|
1.88 | 59% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 82% | 59% | 2.82 |
11. | Guangxi Baoyun | 34 | 6 | 17 | 11 | 32:38 | 35 |
|
1.38 | 44% | 1.5 | 3.7 | 53% | 41% | 2.06 |
12. | Shenyang Urban | 34 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 34:53 | 35 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 1.4 | 3.5 | 82% | 53% | 2.56 |
13. | Shanghai Jiading | 34 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 38:65 | 34 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 82% | 56% | 3.03 |
14. | Jiangxi Liansheng | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 40:51 | 39 |
|
1.25 | 65% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 85% | 53% | 2.68 |
15. | Zibo Sunday | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 37:53 | 39 |
|
0.38 | 53% | 1.8 | 2.9 | 71% | 59% | 2.65 |
16. | Beijing BG | 34 | 6 | 6 | 22 | 24:59 | 24 |
|
0.63 | 35% | 2.1 | 2.5 | 74% | 47% | 2.44 |
17. | Xinjiang Tianshan | 34 | 6 | 3 | 25 | 31:83 | 21 |
|
0.38 | 62% | 1.5 | 3.4 | 85% | 71% | 3.35 |
18. | BIT | 34 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 18:77 | 10 |
|
0.88 | 35% | 1.8 | 2.3 | 79% | 56% | 2.79 |