Preview match
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Serie D - 06/04/22 15:00 - 8.Round
2-2 [94+4‘]
2-2 [94+4‘]
Pica-Pau
[1-0]
|
5‘ | |
Pica-Pau
[2-0]
|
16‘ | |
2-0 HT | ||
51‘ |
2-1
Adailton
|
|
60‘ |
Cris
Adailton
|
|
Cezar
Alexsandro
|
69‘ | |
Aurelio
Cinelton
|
69‘ | |
Diguinho
Teixeira
|
69‘ | |
Teixeira
|
70‘ | |
70‘ |
Rocha
Pinheiro Diniz
|
|
70‘ |
Rodrigo
Levi
|
|
Amorim
|
73‘ | |
Janio
Pedro
|
74‘ | |
79‘ |
2-2
Rodrigo
|
|
Pica-Pau
Paulo
|
79‘ | |
90‘+1 |
Lemos Dutra
Clessione
|
|
2-2 FT |
Match stats
CARDS 2 0
CARDS 0 0
ODDS
Match | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Opening odds | -137 | 240 | 320 | ||
Pre match odds | -175 | 260 | 425 |
Asian handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Line | 1 | 2 | Line |
-1 | 111 | -137 | +1 |
Goals | ||
---|---|---|
Line | Under | Over |
2.5 | -133 | 105 |
Lineups
Status: Confirmed lineup
4 de Julho
Status: Confirmed lineup
Juventude MA
Lineups
Stats:
BENCH
4 de Julho
-
No fresh injuries, same starting lineup?
The coach can use same last starting lineup as there are not reported major missings for this match.
-
Unbeaten run (3) for 4 de Julho
4 de Julho are unbeaten in their last 3 Serie D games (0W, 3D). Players scored 2 goals and 2 conceded in that run.
-
Bad results in last matches for 4 de Julho
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach Emanoel Sacramento Filho as the form record is (1W, 3D, 1L) with their average of 1 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (4) matches
4 de Julho have failed to win 4 matches in a row. Last win was against Tuna Luso (3-0) on 30.4.22
Juventude MA
-
Coach has a full squad available
Medical staff and coach Zé Augusto can be really happy for a full squad available.
-
Bad results in last matches for Juventude MA
Bad form within the last 5 games. Not easy period for the players and coach Zé Augusto as the form record is (0W, 3D, 2L) with their average of 0.8 goals conceded per game.
-
Unwinning streak (5) matches
Juventude MA have failed to win 5 matches in a row. Last win was against Tuna Luso (0-3) on 24.4.22
Summary
H2H
H2H (HOME/AWAY)
FORM
FORM (HOME/AWAY)
Team Strength
Head to head
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/28/22 |
Juventude MA
|
0-0 |
4 de Julho
|
0-0 | 6 - 8 | 3- 5 | 48 - 46 | 5 - 7 |
2 (31%) 0 (39%) |
200 | 200 | 125 | |
09/04/21 |
4 de Julho
|
1-0 |
Juventude MA
|
0-0 | - | - | 63 - 36 | 15 - 2 |
1 (67%) 3 (56%) |
- | - | - | |
06/05/21 |
Juventude MA
|
0-0 |
4 de Julho
|
0-0 | 2 - 3 | 1- 1 | 38 - 52 | 5 - 5 |
0 (0%) 1 (63%) |
225 | 225 | 110 |
Team form
4 de Julho Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.5 |
Juventude MA
|
0 - 0 |
4 de Julho
|
0-0 | 6 - 8 | 3 - 5 | 48 - 46 | 5 - 7 |
2 (31%) 0 (39%) |
200 | 200 | 125 | |
21.5 |
4 de Julho
|
2 - 2 |
Tocantinópolis
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
3 (31%) 3 (31%) |
- | - | - | |
15.5 |
Fluminense PI
|
0 - 0 |
4 de Julho
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
1 (74%) 2 (30%) |
-200 | 250 | 500 | |
8.5 |
4 de Julho
|
0 - 3 |
Castanhal
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
3 (32%) 10 (18%) |
- | - | - | |
30.4 |
4 de Julho
|
3 - 0 |
Tuna Luso
|
0-0 | 15 - 7 | 7 - 1 | 46 - 49 | 6 - 4 |
1 (32%) 5 (18%) |
100 | 220 | 225 | |
24.4 |
Moto Club MA
|
3 - 0 |
4 de Julho
|
1-0 | 13 - 12 | 5 - 2 | 33 - 40 | 4 - 5 |
2 (12%) 5 (33%) |
-110 | 250 | 230 |
Juventude MA Last 6 Matches
HT |
Shots |
Shots (on goal) |
Danger attack |
Corners |
Lineup Changes |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.5 |
Juventude MA
|
0 - 0 |
4 de Julho
|
0-0 | 6 - 8 | 3 - 5 | 48 - 46 | 5 - 7 |
2 (31%) 0 (39%) |
200 | 200 | 125 | |
21.5 |
Castanhal
|
0 - 0 |
Juventude MA
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
3 (24%) 4 (19%) |
- | - | - | |
14.5 |
Juventude MA
|
0 - 1 |
Pacajus
|
0-1 | 11 - 13 | 5 - 3 | 107 - 47 | 6 - 1 |
2 (22%) 4 (37%) |
200 | 230 | 110 | |
7.5 |
Juventude MA
|
0 - 0 |
Tocantinópolis
|
0-0 | 16 - 11 | 5 - 6 | 94 - 99 | 10 - 5 |
0 (18%) 5 (22%) |
700 | 500 | -400 | |
2.5 |
Moto Club MA
|
3 - 0 |
Juventude MA
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
3 (13%) 1 (10%) |
-227 | 400 | 375 | |
24.4 |
Tuna Luso
|
0 - 3 |
Juventude MA
|
0-2 | 23 - 16 | 5 - 6 | 36 - 20 | 3 - 5 |
1 (18%) 6 (4%) |
-345 | 475 | 550 |
Standings
1st Phase | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Amazonas | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 37:12 | 31 |
|
2.13 | 64% | 2.1 | 4.9 | 93% | 71% | 3.50 |
2. | Rio Branco | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 24:11 | 27 |
|
2.00 | 36% | 1.6 | 3.4 | 57% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | São Raimundo AM | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 19:11 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 57% | 1.2 | 3.9 | 100% | 100% | 2.14 |
4. | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 21:14 | 23 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
5. | Porto Velho | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 28:20 | 21 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 1.1 | 0.9 | 69% | 61% | 3.43 |
6. | Trem | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 29:27 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 1.1 | 2.3 | 86% | 79% | 4.00 |
7. | Humaitá | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11:32 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 50% | 1.1 | 1.3 | 71% | 57% | 3.07 |
8. | Náutico RR | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 15:57 | 5 |
|
0.38 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.4 | 100% | 85% | 5.14 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 24:14 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 36% | 2.5 | 4.5 | 93% | 50% | 2.71 |
2. | Tocantinópolis | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 23:21 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 64% | 2.4 | 3.6 | 79% | 64% | 3.14 |
3. | Pacajus | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:13 | 20 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Juventude MA | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14:14 | 20 |
|
1.88 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
5. | Fluminense PI | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 23:19 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 71% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 79% | 71% | 3.00 |
6. | Castanhal | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 16:15 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 1.8 | 5.8 | 64% | 50% | 2.21 |
7. | 4 de Julho | 14 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 13:19 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 1.3 | 4.5 | 71% | 64% | 2.29 |
8. | Tuna Luso | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 12:25 | 13 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 2.4 | 4.2 | 79% | 50% | 2.64 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Retrô | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 27:6 | 33 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 50% | 50% | 2.36 |
2. | América RN | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 20:7 | 24 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 2.4 | 5.6 | 50% | 29% | 1.93 |
3. | Sousa | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 18:17 | 23 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Afogados | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 23:12 | 22 |
|
1.75 | 50% | 1.1 | 0.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
5. | Icasa | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 16:18 | 22 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 1.0 | 2.4 | 64% | 43% | 2.43 |
6. | São Paulo Crystal | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 13:26 | 13 |
|
0.38 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.0 | 71% | 43% | 2.79 |
7. | Globo | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 14:17 | 12 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.4 | 71% | 43% | 2.21 |
8. | Crato | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5:33 | 5 |
|
0.13 | 29% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 79% | 36% | 2.71 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Lagarto | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 23:12 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 57% | 2.9 | 5.9 | 71% | 43% | 2.50 |
2. | ASA | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 15:12 | 25 |
|
1.88 | 29% | 2.3 | 3.5 | 57% | 29% | 1.93 |
3. | Jacuipense | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 19:15 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 57% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.43 |
4. | Santa Cruz | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14:15 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 64% | 29% | 2.07 |
5. | Sergipe | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14:12 | 18 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 2.2 | 4.4 | 64% | 29% | 1.86 |
6. | Juazeirense | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8:13 | 16 |
|
1.00 | 29% | 2.9 | 5.4 | 50% | 7% | 1.50 |
7. | CSE | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 19:22 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 71% | 3.0 | 6.8 | 71% | 64% | 2.93 |
8. | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13:24 | 10 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 2.2 | 4.1 | 79% | 50% | 2.64 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 22:10 | 33 |
|
2.13 | 50% | 0.4 | 1.1 | 100% | 50% | 2.29 |
2. | Anápolis | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 17:11 | 25 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 100% | 100% | 2.00 |
3. | Costa Rica - MS | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14:13 | 21 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.5 | 50% | 50% | 1.93 |
4. | Operário Ltda | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 10:12 | 21 |
|
1.75 | 29% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 50% | 0% | 1.57 |
5. | Ceilândia | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 15:12 | 20 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 57% | 50% | 1.93 |
6. | Iporá | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 12:12 | 15 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 0.7 | 2.4 | 50% | 36% | 1.71 |
7. | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 12:14 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 43% | 1.5 | 3.1 | 50% | 36% | 1.86 |
8. | Acao Cuiaba | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12:30 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 2.5 | 2.6 | 93% | 64% | 3.00 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Pouso Alegre | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 12:9 | 26 |
|
1.63 | 29% | 2.4 | 4.9 | 50% | 21% | 1.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 17:8 | 24 |
|
2.25 | 29% | 1.7 | 3.2 | 50% | 14% | 1.79 |
3. | Real Noroeste | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 19:13 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 57% | 2.2 | 2.6 | 64% | 57% | 2.29 |
4. | Nova Venécia | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 19:13 | 22 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 1.4 | 3.6 | 79% | 50% | 2.29 |
5. | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 16:16 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 2.9 | 4.7 | 57% | 50% | 2.29 |
6. | Ferroviária | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 15:14 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 29% | 1.9 | 5.7 | 57% | 36% | 2.07 |
7. | URT | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 13:26 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 1.4 | 2.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.79 |
8. | Caldense | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8:20 | 5 |
|
0.38 | 43% | 2.0 | 4.8 | 50% | 36% | 2.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | São Bernardo | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 13:3 | 27 |
|
1.88 | 7% | 2.1 | 6.3 | 29% | 14% | 1.14 |
2. | Paraná | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 13:8 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 1.8 | 3.9 | 50% | 14% | 1.50 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 13:10 | 21 |
|
2.13 | 43% | 3.1 | 4.7 | 64% | 14% | 1.64 |
4. | Oeste | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14:15 | 20 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 100% | 0% | 2.07 |
5. | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 13:14 | 20 |
|
1.38 | 57% | 3.1 | 5.8 | 64% | 29% | 1.93 |
6. | Santo André | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 12:13 | 15 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 2.2 | 4.8 | 57% | 21% | 1.79 |
7. | Cianorte | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14:15 | 14 |
|
1.13 | 57% | 2.6 | 3.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.07 |
8. | Perolas Negras | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 9:23 | 8 |
|
0.50 | 43% | 2.4 | 3.6 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | Pts | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG G | ||
1. | Caxias | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 20:12 | 27 |
|
2.13 | 50% | 2.9 | 6.1 | 64% | 43% | 2.29 |
2. | Aimoré | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 17:14 | 27 |
|
2.25 | 36% | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0% | 0% | 2.21 |
3. | Cascavel | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 16:10 | 25 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0% | 0% | 1.86 |
4. | Azuriz | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 17:12 | 24 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 100% | 0% | 2.07 |
5. | São Luiz | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 18:17 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 2.8 | 4.9 | 79% | 50% | 2.50 |
6. | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 14:20 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 2.3 | 5.4 | 64% | 43% | 2.43 |
7. | Juventus SC | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 11:17 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 43% | 2.4 | 3.4 | 64% | 29% | 2.00 |
8. | Prospera Criciuma | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 9:20 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 43% | 2.1 | 3.0 | 50% | 36% | 2.07 |