Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Portugal - 2. Division: Play-offs - 05/16/21 12:00 - 4.Ronde
2-1 [90‘]
2-1 [90‘]
de Wit
[1-0]
|
11‘ | |
Phellype
Catamo
|
21‘ | |
24‘ |
1-1
Oliveira
|
|
HT | ||
64‘ |
Simões
Baptista
|
|
Paz
|
65‘ | |
Baldé
Fernandes
|
65‘ | |
Silva
[2-1]
|
75‘ | |
78‘ |
Fernandes
|
|
82‘ |
André
Oliveira
|
|
82‘ |
Silva
Brigues
|
|
82‘ |
Oliveira
|
|
82‘ |
González
Mucuia
|
|
Moreira
|
85‘ | |
de Wit
|
90‘+1 | |
2-1 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 0 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
Wedstrijd | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Openingsodds | -143 | 220 | 400 | ||
Pre-wedstrijdodds | -143 | 220 | 400 |
Aziatische handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lijn | 1 | 2 | Lijn |
-1 | 159 | -200 | +1 |
Doelpunten | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
2.5 | -161 | 125 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
9.5 | -108 | -114 |
Opstellingen
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Sporting CP II
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Louletano
Opstellingen
Statistieken:
BANK
Sporting CP II
-
Phellype is terug. Boost voor het team
Goed nieuws voor het team. Sleutelspeler Luiz Phellype (3 wedstrijden, 0 doelpunten, 0 assists) is terug na zijn afwezigheid.
-
De coach heeft te maken met 3 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 3 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Pinheiro, Rodrigues, Ferreira.
Louletano
-
Hélio Pinto is een frisse misser
Coach E. Alves Cardoso is zonder zijn sleutelspeler Hélio Pinto (4 wedstrijden, 0 doelpunten, 0 assists). Reden: niet beschikbaar. Zijn afwezigheid kan een grote klap zijn voor het team.
-
De coach heeft te maken met 4 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 4 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Pinto, Marques, Ramires, Chão.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/26/21 |
Louletano
|
2-3 |
Sporting CP II
|
2-1 | 7 - 14 | 4- 7 | 37 - 55 | 4 - 6 |
8 (34%) 1 (58%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Sporting CP II Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.5 |
Sporting CP II
|
0 - 1 |
Oriental Dragon
|
0-0 | 18 - 4 | 10 - 2 | 51 - 32 | 6 - 0 |
1 (65%) 2 (42%) |
-278 | 300 | 700 | |
2.5 |
Moncarapachense
|
2 - 2 |
Sporting CP II
|
- | - | - | - |
2 (71%) 0 (65%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.4 |
Louletano
|
2 - 3 |
Sporting CP II
|
2-1 | 7 - 14 | 4 - 7 | 37 - 55 | 4 - 6 |
8 (34%) 1 (58%) |
- | - | - | |
11.4 |
Real
|
0 - 0 |
Sporting CP II
|
0-0 | 5 - 7 | 2 - 2 | 33 - 44 | 3 - 6 |
0 (74%) 1 (53%) |
190 | 220 | 130 | |
3.4 |
Sporting CP II
|
2 - 0 |
Ideal
|
0-0 | 18 - 6 | 7 - 3 | 82 - 51 | 8 - 1 |
0 (52%) 0 (56%) |
-400 | 450 | 900 | |
20.3 |
Sporting CP II
|
2 - 0 |
Oriental Dragon
|
1-0 | 7 - 5 | 2 - 1 | 60 - 39 | 7 - 6 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
-250 | 300 | 600 |
Louletano Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.5 |
Louletano
|
2 - 0 |
Moncarapachense
|
2-0 | 11 - 6 | 6 - 5 | 34 - 25 | 3 - 5 |
0 (49%) 3 (69%) |
-154 | 210 | 450 | |
2.5 |
Oriental Dragon
|
0 - 2 |
Louletano
|
- | - | - | - |
1 (46%) 4 (42%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.4 |
Louletano
|
2 - 3 |
Sporting CP II
|
2-1 | 7 - 14 | 4 - 7 | 37 - 55 | 4 - 6 |
8 (34%) 1 (58%) |
- | - | - | |
10.4 |
Juventude Evora
|
1 - 1 |
Louletano
|
1-0 | 5 - 17 | 4 - 6 | 35 - 51 | 5 - 6 |
0 (64%) 7 (24%) |
180 | 240 | 115 | |
3.4 |
Louletano
|
1 - 1 |
Vitória FC
|
1-1 | 7 - 13 | 4 - 4 | 30 - 52 | 3 - 10 |
0 (57%) 3 (58%) |
180 | 220 | 138 | |
21.3 |
Louletano
|
2 - 2 |
Juventude Evora
|
1-1 | 11 - 9 | 4 - 6 | 38 - 18 | 5 - 5 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
-175 | 275 | 375 |
Standen
Qualifying Round | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Montalegre | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.3 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
2. | Felgueiras 1932 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
3. | Merelinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.5 | 1.7 | 50% | 17% | 1.67 |
4. | AR São Martinho | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Vitória Guimarães II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 67% | 2.2 | 2.7 | 83% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Fafe | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.5 | 2.5 | 50% | 17% | 1.83 |
3. | Maria da Fonte | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 2.5 | 2.5 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
4. | Mirandela | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5:10 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.8 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sao Joao Ver | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4:2 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.5 | 33% | 17% | 1.00 |
2. | Leca | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.5 | 2.3 | 50% | 17% | 1.67 |
3. | Sanjoanense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
4. | Gondomar | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Canelas 2010 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.8 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.83 |
2. | Lusitania FC Lourosa | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5:2 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.2 | 2.2 | 50% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Marítimo II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:10 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 1.8 | 2.0 | 67% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Amarante | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.0 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Oliveira Hospital | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 7:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 83% | 1.5 | 1.3 | 83% | 33% | 2.17 |
2. | Caldas | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 83% | 0.3 | 1.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.33 |
3. | Loures | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.7 | 3.5 | 50% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Benfica Castelo Branco | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7:8 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 83% | 1.2 | 2.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Alverca | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.5 | 2.2 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | União Santarém | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.2 | 1.5 | 67% | 33% | 2.33 |
3. | Condeixa | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 67% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | Marinhense | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:12 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.5 | 2.3 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sporting CP II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.7 | 2.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
2. | Oriental Dragon | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.2 | 67% | 17% | 1.83 |
3. | Louletano | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:8 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.5 | 83% | 33% | 2.50 |
4. | Moncarapachense | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.2 | 2.5 | 67% | 33% | 2.17 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Amora | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 11:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 2.5 | 2.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
2. | Real | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 5.7 | 50% | 33% | 2.17 |
3. | Olhanense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 17% | 0% | 1.00 |
4. | Praiense | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 17% | 2.2 | 3.3 | 50% | 17% | 1.67 |