Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Vietnam - Second Division - 10/25/20 04:30 - 11.Ronde
2-0 [90‘]
2-0 [90‘]
0-0 HT | ||
2-0 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 3 0
KAARTEN 1 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
Phu Dong
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Phu Dong
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach D. Lê omdat het vormrecord (1W, 3G, 1V) is met hun gemiddelde van 1.4 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Lam Dong
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Lam Dong
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (1W, 1G, 3V) is met hun gemiddelde van 1.6 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/22/20 |
Lam Dong
|
0-2 |
Phu Dong
|
0-2 | 7 - 11 | 1- 5 | 29 - 55 | 3 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Phu Dong Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.10 |
Phu Dong
|
1 - 3 |
PVF Vietnam
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
17.10 |
Phu Dong
|
0 - 0 |
Phú Thọ
|
1 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 55 - 30 | 4 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
13.10 |
Nam Dinh II
|
0 - 1 |
Phu Dong
|
0-1 | 1 - 2 | 1 - 2 | 48 - 63 | 3 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
2.10 |
Da Nang II
|
1 - 1 |
Phu Dong
|
1-0 | 5 - 14 | 4 - 10 | 18 - 33 | 2 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.7 |
Kon Tum
|
3 - 3 |
Phu Dong
|
1-2 | 9 - 12 | 5 - 5 | 54 - 90 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
22.7 |
Lam Dong
|
0 - 2 |
Phu Dong
|
0-2 | 7 - 11 | 1 - 5 | 29 - 55 | 3 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Lam Dong Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.10 |
Lam Dong
|
0 - 4 |
Kon Tum
|
0-1 | 10 - 16 | 4 - 7 | 72 - 85 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
13.10 |
Da Nang II
|
1 - 1 |
Lam Dong
|
0-0 | 10 - 4 | 2 - 2 | 77 - 54 | 12 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
6.10 |
Lam Dong
|
0 - 1 |
Phú Thọ
|
0-0 | 2 - 5 | 0 - 3 | 17 - 50 | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
2.10 |
Lam Dong
|
3 - 1 |
Nam Dinh II
|
1-1 | 10 - 5 | 6 - 2 | 53 - 48 | 6 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.7 |
Lam Dong
|
0 - 1 |
PVF Vietnam
|
0-0 | 16 - 5 | 8 - 3 | 49 - 35 | 6 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
22.7 |
Lam Dong
|
0 - 2 |
Phu Dong
|
0-2 | 7 - 11 | 1 - 5 | 29 - 55 | 3 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Phú Thọ | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 22:7 | 25 |
|
2.25 | 0% | 0.0 | 5.5 | 67% | 33% | 2.42 |
2. | Phu Dong | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16:14 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.1 | 67% | 42% | 2.50 |
3. | PVF Vietnam | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 13:6 | 20 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.2 | 3.8 | 50% | 25% | 1.58 |
4. | Kon Tum | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16:22 | 14 |
|
1.63 | 33% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 83% | 75% | 3.17 |
5. | Da Nang II | 12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 12:15 | 12 |
|
0.50 | 58% | 1.6 | 5.3 | 83% | 25% | 2.25 |
6. | Lam Dong | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7:17 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 33% | 1.6 | 2.8 | 58% | 25% | 2.00 |
7. | Nam Dinh II | 12 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 7:12 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.4 | 42% | 25% | 1.58 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Công An Nhân Dân | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 47:10 | 35 |
|
2.63 | 0% | 1.7 | 5.9 | 93% | 79% | 4.07 |
2. | Gia Định | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 35:11 | 35 |
|
3.00 | 57% | 2.2 | 5.1 | 86% | 79% | 3.29 |
3. | Vĩnh Long | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 24:17 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 1.7 | 5.0 | 79% | 56% | 2.93 |
4. | Binh Thuan | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 17:26 | 17 |
|
0.50 | 57% | 1.5 | 3.2 | 71% | 57% | 3.07 |
5. | Ho Chi Minh City II | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 16:32 | 13 |
|
1.50 | 64% | 1.6 | 2.5 | 94% | 79% | 3.43 |
6. | Tien Giang | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 22:33 | 12 |
|
1.00 | 86% | 1.4 | 2.3 | 100% | 86% | 3.93 |
7. | Dong Nai | 14 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 16:30 | 12 |
|
0.75 | 64% | 1.8 | 3.3 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 |
8. | Triệu Minh | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 19:37 | 12 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 2.2 | 2.0 | 93% | 79% | 4.00 |