Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Brazilië - Serie D - 05/13/18 10:00 - 4.Ronde
2-0 [90+60‘]
2-0 [90+60‘]
Riccieli
[1-0]
|
4‘ | |
15‘ |
Volpi
Eder
|
|
Barone
|
30‘ | |
1-0 HT | ||
46‘ |
Kellyton
|
|
Alison
|
54‘ | |
Gabriel
Ruster
|
57‘ | |
58‘ |
Alessandro
|
|
60‘ |
Lagoa
Alessandro
|
|
Alison
[2-0]
|
66‘ | |
71‘ |
Pages
Jean
|
|
Castilho
|
71‘ | |
72‘ |
Michels
|
|
Castilho
Nascimento
|
74‘ | |
Barone
Leandro
|
82‘ | |
2-0 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 3 0
KAARTEN 3 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Mirassol
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Inter de Lages
Opstellingen
Statistieken:
BANK
Mirassol
Inter de Lages
-
Geen frisse blessures, zelfde basisopstelling?
De coach kan dezelfde laatste basisopstelling gebruiken omdat er geen grote missers zijn gemeld voor deze wedstrijd.
-
De coach heeft te maken met 3 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 3 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Herbert, Boava, Zanqueta.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/07/18 |
Inter de Lages
|
1-0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (40%) 0 (36%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Mirassol Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.5 |
Inter de Lages
|
1 - 0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (40%) 0 (36%) |
- | - | - | |
29.4 |
Caxias
|
0 - 0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | 6 - 9 | 1 - 3 | 80 - 57 | 9 - 4 |
0 (51%) 0 (29%) |
- | - | - | |
22.4 |
Mirassol
|
1 - 0 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
1-0 | 11 - 5 | 3 - 1 | 53 - 57 | 4 - 1 |
0 (0%) 5 (53%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 |
Ponte Preta
|
1 - 0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | 10 - 9 | 1 - 1 | 63 - 49 | 9 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
29.3 |
Mirassol
|
1 - 1 |
Ponte Preta
|
0-0 | 7 - 11 | 1 - 6 | 53 - 31 | 10 - 8 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
129 | 220 | 210 | |
24.3 |
Ituano
|
0 - 2 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | 6 - 16 | 3 - 9 | 68 - 73 | 5 - 7 |
1 (71%) 2 (55%) |
- | - | - |
Inter de Lages Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.5 |
Inter de Lages
|
1 - 0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (40%) 0 (36%) |
- | - | - | |
28.4 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 21 - 4 | 5 - 1 | 78 - 21 | 12 - 3 |
4 (54%) 2 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
22.4 |
Inter de Lages
|
0 - 3 |
Caxias
|
0-0 | 4 - 22 | 2 - 11 | 19 - 35 | 4 - 9 |
0 (0%) 6 (45%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
Brusque
|
1 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
2 (75%) 4 (51%) |
- | - | - | |
28.3 |
Inter de Lages
|
1 - 0 |
Atlético Tubarão
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
2 (74%) 1 (71%) |
- | - | - | |
25.3 |
Criciúma
|
2 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-1 | 17 - 8 | 9 - 2 | 40 - 22 | 4 - 3 |
1 (61%) 2 (71%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14:8 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Rio Branco | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Macapá | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:16 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
4. | Baré | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:8 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:4 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 17% | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:9 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Dom Bosco | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sinop | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.2 | 3.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Novoperário | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Ceilândia | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 67% | 2.5 | 6.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Macaé | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 83% | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Itumbiara | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.8 | 4.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Espírito Santo | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Uberlândia | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 83% | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Novorizontino | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Americano | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:11 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Itapemirim | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | CA Linense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.0 | 6.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.8 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Madureira | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6:7 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.8 | 3.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Caldense | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:7 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Caxias | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 33% | 2.2 | 5.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Inter de Lages | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:11 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.8 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Mirassol | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Nova Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:11 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 2.7 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Novo Hamburgo | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Cianorte | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:5 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 4.0 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
4. | Ferroviária | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | EC São José | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10:4 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Brusque | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.2 | 7.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Prudentópolis | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6:8 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Mogi Mirim | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:14 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Independente PA | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Santos AP | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Plácido de Castro | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8:19 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 83% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 4.50 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Nacional AM | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:4 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:11 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7:10 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 83% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ferroviário | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Cordino | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.8 | 3.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | 4 de Julho | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3:5 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 83% | 2.0 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
2. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | Sparta | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 67% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | ASSU | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:6 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 17% | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11:6 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Imperatriz | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.0 | 7.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Belo Jardim | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6:12 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Guarani de Juazeiro | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8:14 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 83% | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sergipe | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | Jacuipense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Central | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | ASA | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7:11 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.8 | 7.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Campinense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12:3 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 50% | 1.5 | 6.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
3. | Flamengo Arcoverde | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
4. | Murici | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4:16 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 67% | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Treze | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Itabaiana | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Vitória da Conquista | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Santa Rita | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |