Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Azië - AFC Champions League - 07/03/21 06:00 - 4.Ronde
0-3 [90‘]
0-3 [90‘]
12‘ |
0-1
Maruhashi
(Kiyotake)
|
|
Sombatyotha
|
36‘ | |
45‘ |
0-2
Okubo
|
|
0-2 HT | ||
Thawornsak
Jakkuprasat
|
46‘ | |
Sombatyotha
Prempak
|
46‘ | |
Selanon
Roller
|
46‘ | |
47‘ |
0-3
Sakamoto
(Matsuda)
|
|
Dolah
|
54‘ | |
56‘ |
Kato
Okubo
|
|
56‘ |
Nakajima
Tameda
|
|
66‘ |
Kida
Kiyotake
|
|
Suárez
Yannic Chappuis
|
70‘ | |
Dolah
Aksornsri
|
76‘ | |
78‘ |
Matsuda
Harakawa
|
|
79‘ |
Yamada
Sakamoto
|
|
Prempak
|
82‘ | |
0-3 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 3 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
Wedstrijd | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Openingsodds | 700 | 320 | -303 | ||
Pre-wedstrijdodds | 700 | 320 | -303 |
Aziatische handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lijn | 1 | 2 | Lijn |
+1.5 | -110 | -102 | -1.5 |
+1.25 | 114 | -137 | -1.25 |
+1.75 | -147 | 121 | -1.75 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
9.5 | -108 | -114 |
Opstellingen
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Port FC
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Cerezo Osaka
Opstellingen
Statistieken:
BANK
Port FC
-
Tuesday: AFC Champions League (Group Stage)
Port FC speelt tegen Kitchee een belangrijke AFC Champions League wedstrijd (Group Stage - 1/1)
Cerezo Osaka
-
Terugkeer van eerste keus keeper Jin Hyeon Kim
Jin Hyeon Kim is terug nadat hij (1) wedstrijden heeft gemist en zou weer eerste keus moeten zijn.
-
Pagnussat is terug. Boost voor het team
Goed nieuws voor het team. Sleutelspeler Tiago Pagnussat (6 wedstrijden, 3 doelpunten, 0 assists) is terug na zijn afwezigheid.
-
Harakawa is terug. Boost voor het team
Goed nieuws voor het team. Sleutelspeler Riki Harakawa (5 wedstrijden, 0 doelpunten, 3 assists) is terug na zijn afwezigheid.
-
De coach heeft te maken met 3 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 3 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Matsui, Takagi, Toriumi.
-
Tuesday: AFC Champions League (Group Stage)
Cerezo Osaka speelt tegen Guangzhou Evergrande een belangrijke AFC Champions League wedstrijd (Group Stage - 1/1)
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/30/21 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1-1 |
Port FC
|
0-1 | 6 - 17 | 1- 4 | 54 - 91 | 4 - 6 |
10 (14%) 2 (48%) |
350 | 320 | -167 |
Teamvorm
Port FC Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1 - 1 |
Port FC
|
0-1 | 6 - 17 | 1 - 4 | 54 - 91 | 4 - 6 |
10 (14%) 2 (48%) |
350 | 320 | -167 | |
27.6 |
Port FC
|
3 - 0 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
1-0 | 14 - 4 | 6 - 2 | 75 - 45 | 6 - 3 |
2 (56%) 0 (10%) |
-345 | 333 | 800 | |
24.6 |
Kitchee
|
2 - 0 |
Port FC
|
1-0 | 5 - 13 | 3 - 3 | 28 - 99 | 2 - 10 |
2 (63%) 6 (53%) |
-137 | 240 | 320 | |
28.3 |
Nakhonratchasima Mazda FC
|
2 - 2 |
Port FC
|
1-0 | 14 - 13 | 6 - 5 | 96 - 79 | 5 - 3 |
2 (72%) 6 (52%) |
- | - | - | |
20.3 |
Port FC
|
0 - 1 |
Singha Chiangrai United
|
0-0 | 13 - 19 | 2 - 5 | 66 - 70 | 6 - 3 |
4 (63%) 3 (76%) |
- | - | - | |
17.3 |
Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC
|
0 - 0 |
Port FC
|
0-0 | 11 - 14 | 6 - 4 | 73 - 72 | 5 - 2 |
0 (79%) 2 (64%) |
- | - | - |
Cerezo Osaka Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
1 - 1 |
Port FC
|
0-1 | 6 - 17 | 1 - 4 | 54 - 91 | 4 - 6 |
10 (14%) 2 (48%) |
350 | 320 | -167 | |
27.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
2 - 1 |
Kitchee
|
0-1 | 10 - 2 | 3 - 1 | 70 - 36 | 4 - 3 |
1 (59%) 0 (66%) |
-400 | 375 | 1000 | |
24.6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande
|
0 - 2 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-1 | 2 - 19 | 0 - 8 | 27 - 116 | 1 - 7 |
11 (3%) 4 (58%) |
2200 | 1100 | -5000 | |
9.6 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
2 - 0 |
Gainare Tottori
|
2-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
4 (50%) 4 (50%) |
- | - | - | |
30.5 |
Vegalta Sendai
|
1 - 1 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-0 | 11 - 16 | 5 - 7 | 37 - 54 | 1 - 5 |
5 (44%) 2 (59%) |
240 | 250 | 105 | |
26.5 |
Kashima Antlers
|
1 - 0 |
Cerezo Osaka
|
0-0 | 14 - 8 | 5 - 4 | 69 - 43 | 5 - 4 |
3 (54%) 3 (65%) |
-143 | 300 | 350 |
Standen
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | OKMK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Tractor Sazi | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:3 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2:6 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 17% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Esteghlal | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.8 | 4.7 | 50% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Al Ahli | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
4. | Al Shorta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:12 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Foolad | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 1.3 | 5.8 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Wahda | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 2.5 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
3. | Goa | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 67% | 33% | 1.83 |
4. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:1 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Viettel | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Kaya | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Nagoya Grampus | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Pohang Steelers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.8 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
4. | Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0:10 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.50 |
2. | Gamba Osaka | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 83% | 50% | 2.50 |
4. | Tampines Rovers | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:27 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.2 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 4.67 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27:3 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.3 | 8.5 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.8 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
3. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:24 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 67% | 4.67 |
4. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:23 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Cerezo Osaka | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Kitchee | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Port FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.5 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 67% | 50% | 3.00 |