Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Brazilië - Serie D - 07/28/17 20:00
2-1 [90+60‘]
2-1 [90+60‘]
Tadeu
[1-0]
|
1‘ | |
36‘ |
Martins
|
|
37‘ |
Pedrão
|
|
da Silva
[2-0]
|
41‘ | |
Júnior
|
43‘ | |
2-0 HT | ||
46‘ |
Alcione
Liel
|
|
53‘ |
2-1
Henrique
|
|
Unknown
|
54‘ | |
59‘ |
Alcione
|
|
Tadeu
|
62‘ | |
64‘ |
Brasília
Beto
|
|
Júnior
Richardson
|
72‘ | |
74‘ |
Cesar
Elivelto
|
|
da Silva
Cleyton
|
76‘ | |
Tadeu
Kiros
|
81‘ | |
2-1 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 3 0
KAARTEN 3 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
América RN
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Ceilândia
Opstellingen
Statistieken:
BANK
América RN
-
América RN heeft goede vorm in de laatste 5 wedstrijden
Coach Leandro Caitano de Campos kan tevreden zijn met de vorm van zijn team (4W, 1G, 0V) van de laatste 5 wedstrijden.
-
Onverslagen reeks (5) voor América RN
América RN is ongeslagen in hun laatste 5 Serie D wedstrijden (4W, 1G). Spelers scoorden 7 doelpunten en 2 tegen in die reeks.
Ceilândia
-
De coach heeft te maken met 3 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 3 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Piedra, Almeida, Jefferson.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/22/17 |
Ceilândia
|
0-1 |
América RN
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
2 (2%) 1 (6%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
América RN Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22.7 |
Ceilândia
|
0 - 1 |
América RN
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
2 (2%) 1 (6%) |
- | - | - | |
15.7 |
América RN
|
1 - 0 |
Aparecidense
|
0-0 | 2 - 1 | 1 - 0 | 13 - 6 | 7 - 4 |
0 (2%) 1 (3%) |
- | - | - | |
8.7 |
Aparecidense
|
0 - 0 |
América RN
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.6 |
Murici
|
0 - 2 |
América RN
|
0-0 | 11 - 14 | 3 - 6 | 41 - 29 | 7 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-143 | 260 | 333 | |
18.6 |
América RN
|
3 - 2 |
Sergipe
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-250 | 300 | 650 | |
11.6 |
Jacobina
|
1 - 0 |
América RN
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
300 | 220 | -110 |
Ceilândia Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22.7 |
Ceilândia
|
0 - 1 |
América RN
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
2 (2%) 1 (6%) |
- | - | - | |
15.7 |
Ceilândia
|
1 - 1 |
Comercial MS
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
1 (3%) 3 (3%) |
- | - | - | |
9.7 |
Comercial MS
|
0 - 1 |
Ceilândia
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.6 |
Anápolis
|
2 - 0 |
Ceilândia
|
1-0 | 11 - 4 | 5 - 2 | 26 - 27 | 7 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-137 | 230 | 375 | |
17.6 |
Ceilândia
|
3 - 0 |
Sinop
|
1-0 | 14 - 5 | 8 - 2 | 101 - 67 | 8 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-227 | 300 | 600 | |
10.6 |
Ceilândia
|
0 - 1 |
Comercial MS
|
0-1 | 15 - 4 | 4 - 2 | 32 - 30 | 10 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-227 | 350 | 425 |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atlético Acreano | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Princesa Solimões | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Trem | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:11 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:14 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ceilândia | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | Comercial MS | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anápolis | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Sinop | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5:11 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Luziânia | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.0 | 3.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | 7 de Setembro | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.8 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | URT | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Itumbiara | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Osasco Audax | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4:9 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Villa Nova | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Desportiva ES | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.2 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | Bangu | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.8 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Portuguesa | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Boavista | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Espírito Santo | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | RB Brasil | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Caldense | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6:11 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Operário PR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 17% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
2. | Brusque | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | XV de Piracicaba | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | São Paulo RS | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:12 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | São Bernardo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Inter de Lages | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
3. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Novo Hamburgo | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | EC São José | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Metropolitano | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
3. | Ituano | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.2 | 5.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | PSTC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:10 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Gurupi | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Fast Clube | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Baré | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Rio Branco | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | São Francisco PA | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Gênus | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Santos AP | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 67% | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Cordino | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Tocantins Miracema | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5:14 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Guarany de Sobral | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Maranhão | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:4 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Ríver | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Potiguar Mossoró | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Globo | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.2 | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Parnahyba | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Guarani de Juazeiro | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sousa | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Coruripe | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
4. | Central | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Atlético PE | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:12 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Itabaiana | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13:4 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 33% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Jacobina | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:11 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Murici | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |