Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Brazilië - Serie D - 06/10/17 15:00 - 4.Ronde
0-0 [90+60‘]
0-0 [90+60‘]
Hélder
|
20‘ | |
37‘ |
Barros
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
Nunes
Rychely
|
46‘ | |
Henrique
Schwenck
|
57‘ | |
63‘ |
Marinho
|
|
68‘ |
Augusto
Andrezinho
|
|
75‘ |
Adriano
Wadson
|
|
Bulhões
Felisbino
|
75‘ | |
83‘ |
Pará
Portela
|
|
Pablo
|
90‘+2 | |
0-0 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 1 1
KAARTEN 2 0
ODDS
Wedstrijd | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Openingsodds | -118 | 240 | 270 | ||
Pre-wedstrijdodds | -118 | 240 | 270 |
Opstellingen
Anápolis
Sinop
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/04/17 |
Sinop
|
2-2 |
Anápolis
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Anápolis Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 |
Sinop
|
2 - 2 |
Anápolis
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
27.5 |
Anápolis
|
1 - 1 |
Comercial MS
|
0-1 | 13 - 5 | 8 - 5 | 40 - 24 | 12 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
21.5 |
Ceilândia
|
1 - 0 |
Anápolis
|
0-0 | 10 - 11 | 2 - 3 | 41 - 26 | 4 - 3 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
9.4 |
Aparecidense
|
1 - 2 |
Anápolis
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
11 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
Anápolis
|
1 - 1 |
Atlético GO
|
0-0 | 9 - 11 | 2 - 2 | 40 - 43 | 2 - 4 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
29.3 |
Rio Verde GO
|
1 - 1 |
Anápolis
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
11 (0%) 5 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Sinop Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 |
Sinop
|
2 - 2 |
Anápolis
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
28.5 |
Sinop
|
1 - 1 |
Ceilândia
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.5 |
Comercial MS
|
2 - 0 |
Sinop
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
11 (0%) 7 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
7.5 |
Sinop
|
1 - 0 |
Cuiabá
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
30.4 |
Cuiabá
|
2 - 1 |
Sinop
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
16.4 |
Sinop
|
4 - 0 |
Dom Bosco
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atlético Acreano | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Princesa Solimões | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Trem | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:11 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:14 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ceilândia | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | Comercial MS | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anápolis | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Sinop | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5:11 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Luziânia | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.0 | 3.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | 7 de Setembro | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9:2 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.8 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | URT | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 17% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
3. | Itumbiara | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Osasco Audax | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4:9 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Villa Nova | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Desportiva ES | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.2 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | Bangu | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.8 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Portuguesa | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Boavista | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Espírito Santo | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | RB Brasil | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Caldense | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6:11 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Operário PR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 17% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
2. | Brusque | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | XV de Piracicaba | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | São Paulo RS | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:12 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | São Bernardo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Inter de Lages | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
3. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Novo Hamburgo | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:6 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | EC São José | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Metropolitano | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 17% | 17% | 1.33 |
3. | Ituano | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.2 | 5.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | PSTC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3:10 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Gurupi | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:6 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Fast Clube | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Baré | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:9 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Rio Branco | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | São Francisco PA | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Gênus | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Santos AP | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11:6 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 67% | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Cordino | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Tocantins Miracema | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5:14 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Guarany de Sobral | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Maranhão | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:4 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Ríver | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Potiguar Mossoró | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Globo | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.2 | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Parnahyba | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Guarani de Juazeiro | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:7 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sousa | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Coruripe | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
4. | Central | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 17% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Atlético PE | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:12 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Itabaiana | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13:4 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 33% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Jacobina | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:11 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Murici | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |