Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Brazilië - Serie D - 06/09/19 17:00 - 6.Ronde
1-2 [90+60‘]
1-2 [90+60‘]
Gabriel
[1-0]
|
4‘ | |
12‘ |
1-1
Ávila
|
|
1-1 HT | ||
53‘ |
Boff
|
|
57‘ |
Geovani
Gonçalves
|
|
64‘ |
Jeffinho
Boff
|
|
Luan
Lacerda
|
67‘ | |
71‘ |
Geovani
|
|
78‘ |
Marcelinho
Ávila
|
|
Silva
Unknown
|
79‘ | |
81‘ |
1-2
Jeffinho
|
|
81‘ |
Henrique
|
|
Vinicius Gomes de Lima
|
88‘ | |
Gabriel
Vinicius Gomes de Lima
|
88‘ | |
1-2 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 1 0
KAARTEN 2 0
ODDS
Wedstrijd | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Openingsodds | -167 | 250 | 450 | ||
Pre-wedstrijdodds | -167 | 250 | 450 |
Aziatische handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lijn | 1 | 2 | Lijn |
-1 | 119 | -159 | +1 |
Doelpunten | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
2.5 | 100 | -125 |
Opstellingen
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
Anapolina
Status: Bevestigde opstelling
União Rondonópolis
Opstellingen
Statistieken:
BANK
Anapolina
União Rondonópolis
-
De coach heeft te maken met 3 frisse missers
Volgens het nieuws is het team zonder 3 frisse misser. Deze spelers voegen zich bij de misserslijst: Junior, Alberto Brizuela, Henrick.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/06/19 |
União Rondonópolis
|
1-2 |
Anapolina
|
1-1 | 6 - 12 | 3- 6 | 44 - 54 | 5 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Anapolina Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 |
CAP Patrocinense
|
0 - 1 |
Anapolina
|
0-0 | 9 - 14 | 0 - 1 | 53 - 36 | 6 - 1 |
1 (73%) 5 (39%) |
-105 | 210 | 300 | |
26.5 |
Operário MS
|
1 - 1 |
Anapolina
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
1 (59%) 3 (68%) |
- | - | - | |
18.5 |
Anapolina
|
0 - 1 |
Operário MS
|
0-1 | 16 - 11 | 3 - 3 | 61 - 47 | 3 - 3 |
1 (24%) 1 (14%) |
-200 | 280 | 500 | |
11.5 |
Anapolina
|
1 - 1 |
CAP Patrocinense
|
1-0 | 10 - 5 | 5 - 1 | 49 - 44 | 6 - 2 |
0 (15%) 0 (19%) |
120 | 220 | 188 | |
6.5 |
União Rondonópolis
|
1 - 2 |
Anapolina
|
1-1 | 6 - 12 | 3 - 6 | 44 - 54 | 5 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.3 |
Atlético GO
|
4 - 1 |
Anapolina
|
2-0 | 18 - 10 | 7 - 4 | 53 - 24 | 5 - 3 |
4 (40%) 3 (47%) |
-500 | 450 | 1200 |
União Rondonópolis Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
União Rondonópolis
|
2 - 2 |
Operário MS
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
3 (68%) 2 (60%) |
- | - | - | |
26.5 |
CAP Patrocinense
|
2 - 0 |
União Rondonópolis
|
0-0 | 10 - 9 | 6 - 1 | 50 - 39 | 3 - 3 |
2 (74%) 2 (76%) |
-110 | 250 | 260 | |
20.5 |
União Rondonópolis
|
3 - 2 |
CAP Patrocinense
|
2-1 | 13 - 7 | 5 - 3 | 43 - 48 | 2 - 6 |
1 (13%) 0 (25%) |
138 | 210 | 188 | |
12.5 |
Operário MS
|
0 - 2 |
União Rondonópolis
|
0-0 | 8 - 6 | 1 - 2 | 47 - 28 | 9 - 3 |
1 (43%) 2 (81%) |
155 | 225 | 140 | |
6.5 |
União Rondonópolis
|
1 - 2 |
Anapolina
|
1-1 | 6 - 12 | 3 - 6 | 44 - 54 | 5 - 9 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
7.4 |
Operário Ltda
|
0 - 0 |
União Rondonópolis
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |