Greater Toledo W vs Ambassadors Cleveland W: LiveScore, Live Stream + Voorspelling

15‘

30‘

45‘

60‘

75‘

90‘

Corners

1-2 [75‘]

HT
1-2 FT

Alles 1e 2e

Wedstrijdstatistieken

KAARTEN 0 0

Balbezit

KAARTEN 0 0

Totale schoten

Op doel

Hoeken

Gevaarlijke aanval

Aanval

ODDS

Opstellingen

Greater Toledo W

Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Greater Toledo W

Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (0W, 0G, 5V) is met hun gemiddelde van 3.4 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Winloze reeks (5) wedstrijden

Greater Toledo W heeft niet gewonnen in 5 wedstrijden op rij. Laatste overwinning was tegen Corktown W (2-0) op 1.6.24
5 wedstrijden verloren op rij. Tijd voor tactische verandering?

Slechte periode voor Greater Toledo W. Coach kan niet tevreden zijn met 5 wedstrijden verliesreeks. Het is zeer waarschijnlijk dat de coach een tactische verandering zal doorvoeren.

Ambassadors Cleveland W

Ambassadors Cleveland W heeft goede vorm in de laatste 5 wedstrijden

Coach kan tevreden zijn met de vorm van zijn team (5W, 0G, 0V) van de laatste 5 wedstrijden.
Onverslagen reeks (7) voor Ambassadors Cleveland W

Ambassadors Cleveland W is ongeslagen in hun laatste 7 WPSL wedstrijden (6W, 1G). Spelers scoorden 23 doelpunten en 8 tegen in die reeks.

Samenvatting

H2H

H2H (THUIS/UIT)

VORM

0.5

2.67

VORM (THUIS/UIT)

2.33

Teamsterkte

0% Gem. minuten gespeeld (laatste 6) 0%

0 Wijzigingen (t.o.v. laatste wedstrijd) 0

0 Frisse belangrijke missers 0

0 Missers 0

Head to head

0overwinningen

0 gelijkspellen

1 overwinningen

1 wedstrijden

100%

Algemeen Thuis Uit

Algemeen Competitie Bekers

OVER 1.5

100% 1/1 times

OVER 2.5

100% 1/1 times

OVER 3.5

100% 1/1 times

BTTS

0% 0/1 times

KAARTEN

0 Ø

Hoeken

0 Ø

					RT	Schoten	Schoten (op doel)	Gevaarlijke aanval	Hoeken	Opstelling Wijzigingen	1	X	2
06/21/24		Ambassadors Cleveland W	4-0	Greater Toledo W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-

Teamvorm

1.00 0.50 (+-50%) total

2.67 (+15%) total 2.33

Greater Toledo W Last 6 Matches

Algemeen Thuis Uit

OVER 1.5

100% 6/6 times

OVER 2.5

67% 4/6 times

OVER 3.5

67% 4/6 times

BTTS

33% 2/6 times

KAARTEN

0 Ø

Hoeken

0 Ø

Alles Competitie Bekers

				RT	Schoten	Schoten (op doel)	Gevaarlijke aanval	Hoeken	Opstelling Wijzigingen	1	X	2
23.6	Columbus Eagles W	5 - 0	Greater Toledo W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
21.6	Ambassadors Cleveland W	4 - 0	Greater Toledo W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
11.6	Corktown W	3 - 1	Greater Toledo W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
8.6	Greater Toledo W	1 - 3	Beadling W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
2.6	Greater Toledo W	0 - 2	Columbus Eagles W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
1.6	Greater Toledo W	2 - 0	Corktown W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-

Ambassadors Cleveland W Last 6 Matches

Algemeen Thuis Uit

OVER 1.5

100% 6/6 times

OVER 2.5

83% 5/6 times

OVER 3.5

67% 4/6 times

BTTS

50% 3/6 times

KAARTEN

0 Ø

Hoeken

0 Ø

Alles Competitie Bekers

				RT	Schoten	Schoten (op doel)	Gevaarlijke aanval	Hoeken	Opstelling Wijzigingen	1	X	2
28.6	Ambassadors Cleveland W	5 - 1	Columbus Eagles W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
26.6	Beadling W	0 - 2	Ambassadors Cleveland W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
21.6	Ambassadors Cleveland W	4 - 0	Greater Toledo W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
16.6	Corktown W	3 - 4	Ambassadors Cleveland W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
12.6	Ambassadors Cleveland W	3 - 0	Beadling W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-
9.6	Columbus Eagles W	3 - 3	Ambassadors Cleveland W		-	-	-	-	0 (0%) 0 (0%)	-	-	-

Standen

Standen Vorm Vooruitgang

Totaal Thuis Uit

South West East Central

South
Atlantic Carolinas
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Charlotte Eagles W	8	7	0	1	28:4	21		2.63	38%	0.0	0.9	0%	0%	4.00
2.	Port City NC W	8	6	0	2	17:7	18		2.25	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.00
3.	WFC Charlotte W	8	4	0	4	15:12	12		1.50	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.38
4.	Trinity Fire W	8	1	1	6	3:22	4		0.50	25%	0.1	0.1	0%	0%	3.13
5.	Neuse River W	8	1	1	6	6:24	4		0.50	63%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.75
Atlantic The District
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Arlington VA W	7	6	1	0	25:4	19		2.71	43%	0.0	0.6	50%	50%	4.14
2.	McLean W	7	6	1	0	30:7	19		2.71	57%	0.3	1.3	75%	75%	5.29
3.	UK FC W	8	4	0	4	19:23	12		1.50	75%	0.0	0.4	100%	100%	5.25
4.	Alexandria Reds W	8	1	1	6	13:24	4		0.50	75%	0.1	1.0	100%	83%	4.63
5.	Washington Dutch Lions W	8	0	1	7	7:36	1		0.13	63%	0.0	0.5	0%	0%	5.38
Lone Star
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Classics Elite W	10	5	4	1	32:13	19		1.63	70%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.50
2.	Houston Aces W	10	5	3	2	25:10	18		1.88	60%	0.1	1.3	75%	75%	3.50
3.	Austin Rise W	10	5	3	2	22:9	18		1.88	50%	0.3	0.2	0%	0%	3.10
4.	Futbolera Select W	10	2	5	3	20:14	11		1.25	60%	0.1	0.1	100%	100%	3.40
5.	SouthStar W	10	3	5	2	20:9	14		1.63	40%	0.0	0.3	0%	0%	2.90
6.	San Antonio Runners W	10	0	0	10	0:64	0		0.00	0%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	6.40
Southeast
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	865 Alliance W	8	6	2	0	31:7	20		2.50	63%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.75
2.	Decatur W	8	6	1	1	24:3	19		2.38	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.38
3.	UFA Gunners W	8	5	2	1	36:7	17		2.13	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.38
4.	Nashville Rhythm W	8	5	1	2	27:9	16		2.00	38%	0.0	2.6	100%	100%	4.50
5.	Georgia Impact W	8	4	2	2	26:8	14		1.75	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.25
6.	Chattanooga W	8	3	0	5	19:26	9		1.13	88%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.63
7.	Atlanta Fire W	8	2	0	6	10:28	6		0.75	25%	0.0	0.0	50%	50%	4.75
8.	FC Birmingham W	8	1	0	7	5:41	3		0.38	13%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.75
9.	Nashville Wolves W	8	0	0	8	2:51	0		0.00	13%	0.0	0.1	100%	100%	6.63
Sunshine
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	West Florida Flames W	8	5	3	0	20:4	18		2.25	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.00
2.	Sunrise Prime W	8	5	1	2	16:8	16		2.00	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.00
3.	Seminole Ice W	8	5	1	2	21:14	16		2.00	75%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.38
4.	Cape Coral Cyclones W	8	5	0	3	17:10	15		1.88	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.38
5.	Jacksonville Armada W	8	4	2	2	16:5	14		1.75	25%	0.3	1.3	88%	58%	2.63
6.	Dade County W	7	2	2	3	11:11	8		1.14	57%	0.1	2.0	75%	50%	3.14
7.	Gulf Coast Dutch Lions W	7	2	0	5	11:18	6		0.86	71%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.14
8.	North Port Fusion W	8	1	1	6	5:33	4		0.50	25%	0.0	0.8	100%	100%	4.75
9.	AGC W	8	1	0	7	9:23	3		0.38	63%	0.1	0.3	100%	100%	4.00

West
Desert
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	SC del Sol W	10	9	1	0	46:7	28		2.75	50%	0.2	0.4	100%	100%	5.30
2.	Tucson W	10	5	3	2	29:11	18		1.50	40%	0.2	2.7	88%	75%	4.00
3.	Arizona Arsenal W	10	4	3	3	38:18	15		1.13	60%	0.1	0.7	75%	75%	5.60
4.	Royals AZ W	10	4	2	4	34:12	14		1.75	60%	0.0	0.9	75%	63%	4.60
5.	El Paso Surf W	10	2	2	6	11:52	8		0.63	50%	0.0	0.1	0%	0%	6.30
6.	RSL Southern Arizona W	10	0	1	9	4:62	1		0.13	20%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	6.60
Northwest
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Spokane SC Shadow	8	6	1	1	35:11	19		2.38	50%	0.1	0.4	0%	0%	5.75
2.	Portland Thorns II W	8	4	2	2	22:13	14		1.75	75%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.38
3.	Seattle Reign II W	8	4	1	3	17:12	13		1.63	38%	0.1	1.3	88%	54%	3.63
4.	Westside Timbers	8	1	4	3	4:13	7		0.88	25%	0.1	1.0	38%	25%	2.13
5.	Vancouver Victory W	8	0	2	6	1:30	2		0.25	13%	0.5	0.8	71%	71%	3.88
Pac North
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	California Storm W	9	6	3	0	32:8	21		2.25	56%	0.3	1.6	50%	50%	4.44
2.	Davis W	9	6	3	0	19:8	21		2.50	67%	0.3	1.6	75%	63%	3.00
3.	San Francisco Nighthawks W	9	6	2	1	27:12	20		2.13	67%	0.4	1.9	100%	100%	4.33
4.	Iron Rose W	9	4	5	0	23:10	17		2.00	67%	0.4	1.3	100%	50%	3.67
5.	Lamorinda United W	9	5	0	4	35:17	15		1.50	44%	0.7	5.9	100%	100%	5.78
6.	Napa Valley 1839	9	2	2	5	22:29	8		0.63	100%	0.1	1.2	100%	83%	5.67
7.	San Francisco Elite W	9	1	3	5	9:23	6		0.63	67%	0.1	1.7	88%	63%	3.56
8.	Fresno Freeze W	9	1	3	5	5:27	6		0.75	44%	0.6	2.1	75%	50%	3.56
9.	San Ramon W	9	1	2	6	10:25	5		0.63	56%	0.0	1.8	38%	13%	3.89
10.	BattleBorn W	9	1	1	7	13:36	4		0.50	56%	0.0	0.1	88%	88%	5.44
SoCal Coastal
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Beach W	8	5	2	1	21:11	17		2.13	75%	0.0	1.8	100%	58%	4.00
2.	Invictus Athletic Club W	8	4	3	1	21:10	15		1.88	75%	0.0	0.6	100%	67%	3.88
3.	Miss Kick	8	3	4	1	19:11	13		1.63	75%	0.0	2.0	100%	71%	3.75
4.	So Cal Eagles W	8	1	2	5	4:20	5		0.63	38%	0.3	0.9	88%	63%	3.00
5.	LA Surf W	8	1	1	6	8:21	4		0.50	38%	0.3	0.5	83%	67%	3.63
6.	Rebels Empire W	0	0	0	0	0:0	0		0.00	0%	-	-	0%	0%	0
SoCal Plymouth
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	San Diego Surf W	8	5	2	1	24:9	17		2.13	63%	0.3	4.0	67%	67%	4.13
2.	San Diego Srikers W	8	4	1	3	18:9	13		1.63	50%	1.0	2.0	100%	100%	3.38
3.	So Cal Union W	8	4	1	3	19:17	13		1.63	75%	0.6	1.3	83%	83%	4.50
4.	Oceanside Dutch Lions W	8	4	0	4	18:23	12		1.50	88%	0.1	1.5	90%	90%	5.13
5.	Rebels Chula Vista W	8	3	2	3	13:17	11		1.38	63%	0.0	3.4	100%	100%	3.75
6.	San Diego Parceiro	8	2	3	3	7:10	9		1.13	50%	0.3	3.0	75%	46%	2.13
7.	Albion San Diego W	8	1	1	6	8:22	4		0.50	63%	0.0	2.4	75%	38%	3.75

East
Great Lakes Great River
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Ambassadors Cleveland W	8	7	1	0	25:9	22		2.75	63%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.25
2.	Columbus Eagles W	8	5	2	1	22:12	17		2.13	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.25
3.	Beadling W	8	3	1	4	9:15	10		1.25	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.00
4.	Corktown W	8	1	2	5	14:19	5		0.63	75%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.13
5.	Greater Toledo W	8	1	0	7	6:21	3		0.38	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.38
Great Lakes Lake Erie
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Niagara 1812 W	8	4	2	2	13:8	14		1.75	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.63
2.	Rochester New York W	8	4	2	2	7:10	14		1.75	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.13
3.	Cleveland Ambassadors W	8	4	0	4	23:11	12		1.50	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.25
4.	BC United NY W	7	3	1	3	11:9	10		1.43	43%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.86
5.	Erie W	7	1	1	5	2:18	4		0.57	14%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.86
Metropolitan
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	SUSA W	8	7	0	1	23:7	21		2.63	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.75
2.	Downtown United W	8	6	1	1	31:4	19		2.38	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.38
3.	STA W	8	6	1	1	17:7	19		2.38	50%	0.0	0.4	0%	0%	3.00
4.	New York Athletic W	8	3	1	4	13:14	10		1.25	50%	0.0	0.3	58%	58%	3.38
5.	Brooklyn City W	8	3	1	4	6:10	10		1.25	38%	0.0	0.8	50%	38%	2.00
6.	NJ Wizards Cedar Stars W	7	0	0	7	7:29	0		0.00	71%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.14
7.	New York Dutch Lions W	7	0	0	7	3:29	0		0.00	43%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.57
Mid-Atlantic Colonial
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Penn Fusion SA W	10	6	3	1	30:16	21		2.13	90%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.60
2.	SJEB W	9	5	3	1	14:10	18		2.13	67%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.67
3.	Real Central NJ W	10	5	1	4	29:14	16		1.50	60%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.30
4.	CAFC Ospreys W	9	5	1	3	25:14	16		2.00	89%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.33
5.	Philadelphia Ukrainians W	9	3	1	5	14:20	10		1.13	67%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.78
6.	Philly Fever W	10	2	2	6	9:19	8		0.50	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	2.80
7.	West-Mont United W	9	1	1	7	10:38	4		0.38	78%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.33
Mid-Atlantic Commonwealth
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Keystone W	10	8	0	2	31:9	24		2.63	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.00
2.	Reading United W	10	6	2	2	25:14	20		1.75	70%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.90
3.	PA Classics W	10	6	1	3	25:16	19		1.63	80%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.10
4.	Lehigh Valley Tempest W	10	6	0	4	22:16	18		1.88	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.80
5.	Hershey W	10	1	1	8	7:29	4		0.50	50%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.60
6.	LVU Rush W	10	0	2	8	5:31	2		0.25	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.60
Northeastern
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Clarkstown W	8	8	0	0	29:5	24		3.00	50%	0.0	0.6	0%	0%	4.25
2.	Rhode Island Rogues W	8	5	1	2	28:13	16		2.00	75%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	5.13
3.	Merrimack Valley Hawks W	8	3	1	4	13:19	10		1.25	50%	0.0	0.5	0%	0%	4.00
4.	New York Shockers W	8	1	1	6	12:27	4		0.50	75%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.88
5.	Force New York W	8	1	1	6	5:23	4		0.50	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.50

Central
Heartland
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Kansas City SG W	10	8	1	1	23:9	25		2.38	60%	0.1	0.7	0%	0%	3.20
2.	KC Courage W	10	6	2	2	25:10	20		1.75	50%	0.2	0.5	100%	100%	3.50
3.	Oklahoma City W	10	4	5	1	16:11	17		1.63	60%	0.4	0.7	0%	0%	2.70
4.	Sunflower State W	10	4	3	3	22:20	15		1.50	100%	0.8	2.2	100%	88%	4.20
5.	Wichita W	10	4	0	6	15:17	12		1.50	70%	0.1	0.4	88%	75%	3.20
6.	Missouri Reign W	10	1	2	7	7:18	5		0.63	60%	0.4	0.2	0%	0%	2.50
7.	Side FC 92 W	10	1	1	8	5:28	4		0.13	40%	0.0	0.8	55%	45%	3.30
Midwest Gateway
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Dayton W	10	9	1	0	31:5	28		2.75	50%	0.0	0.4	83%	63%	3.60
2.	Junction W	10	5	3	2	23:11	18		1.88	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.40
3.	FC Pride W	10	5	1	4	27:10	16		1.50	40%	0.0	2.7	73%	53%	3.70
4.	Lou Fusz Athletic W	10	5	1	4	24:14	16		1.25	40%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.80
5.	Dayton Dutch Lions W	10	1	1	8	2:31	4		0.50	10%	0.1	0.2	100%	100%	3.30
6.	Spirit W	10	1	1	8	5:41	4		0.50	40%	0.0	0.0	100%	75%	4.60
Midwest Lake Michigan
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Milwaukee Torrent W	8	8	0	0	37:3	24		3.00	38%	0.1	1.5	100%	63%	5.00
2.	Green Bay Glory W	8	5	0	3	15:9	15		1.88	38%	0.1	0.6	50%	38%	3.00
3.	Chicago KICS W	8	3	2	3	14:13	11		1.38	75%	0.3	2.0	100%	63%	3.38
4.	Chicago House W	8	2	1	5	8:21	7		0.88	50%	0.3	0.1	100%	75%	3.63
5.	Quad Cities Rush	8	0	1	7	2:30	1		0.13	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.00
Mountain Rockies
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Colorado Pride W	8	7	0	1	47:4	21		2.63	38%	0.0	0.3	0%	0%	6.38
2.	PSD Academy W	8	5	1	2	26:10	16		2.00	38%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.50
3.	Indios Denver W	8	5	1	2	14:8	16		2.00	25%	0.0	0.3	0%	0%	2.75
4.	Broomfield Burn W	8	2	0	6	7:21	6		0.75	0%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	3.50
5.	Colorado Blizzard W	8	0	0	8	4:55	0		0.00	25%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	7.38
Mountain Wasatch
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Utah Surf W	10	8	1	1	39:9	25		2.75	40%	0.2	4.5	100%	70%	4.80
2.	La Roca W	10	6	3	1	37:17	21		1.88	80%	0.3	4.4	100%	88%	5.40
3.	Utah Avalanche W	10	6	2	2	33:21	20		2.13	80%	0.1	2.4	100%	80%	5.40
4.	Griffins W	10	3	1	6	12:25	10		0.88	50%	0.0	2.4	100%	80%	3.70
5.	Utah Red Devils W	10	2	1	7	16:33	7		0.88	60%	0.2	2.3	88%	75%	4.90
6.	Northern Utah United W	10	1	0	9	7:39	3		0.00	50%	0.1	0.4	88%	88%	4.60
Northern
#	Team	GW	W	G	V	D	Ptn	Vorm	PPG	BTTS			1.5+	2.5+	GEM D
1.	Sioux Falls City W	9	9	0	0	35:1	27		3.00	11%	0.0	0.9	100%	50%	4.00
2.	Salvo W	9	7	1	1	29:2	22		2.38	11%	0.1	4.4	71%	71%	3.44
3.	Minnesota Thunder W	9	6	0	3	38:8	18		1.88	33%	0.1	3.8	90%	55%	5.11
4.	St. Croix W	9	4	3	2	11:6	15		1.50	44%	0.1	1.0	75%	50%	1.89
5.	Mankato W	9	5	0	4	16:14	15		1.88	22%	0.1	0.0	100%	100%	3.33
6.	Rochester United W	9	3	2	4	12:27	11		1.38	33%	0.8	1.2	58%	58%	4.33
7.	Joy W	9	3	1	5	13:17	10		1.25	67%	0.1	2.4	100%	38%	3.33
8.	Maplebrook Fury W	9	2	2	5	12:18	8		0.88	56%	0.1	2.6	83%	67%	3.33
9.	Dakota Fusion W	9	1	0	8	3:41	3		0.38	11%	0.0	0.0	0%	0%	4.89
10.	Manitou W	9	0	1	8	4:39	1		0.00	44%	0.1	0.9	100%	83%	4.78