Pregled utakmice
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Serie D - 06/02/19 15:00 - 5.Kolo
1-2 [90‘]
1-2 [90‘]
15‘ |
0-1
Tocantins
|
|
Rudnei
[1-1]
|
17‘ | |
1-1 HT | ||
Sayão
Erick
|
56‘ | |
Henrique
Rogério
|
57‘ | |
Machado
|
63‘ | |
64‘ |
Oliveira
|
|
66‘ |
Baiano
|
|
67‘ |
Silva
|
|
Lucas
|
72‘ | |
Rudnei
Costa
|
73‘ | |
79‘ |
Reverson
Tocantins
|
|
86‘ |
Berguinho
Humberto
|
|
Lucas
|
89‘ | |
Erick
|
90‘+1 | |
Bahia
|
90‘+2 | |
90‘+3 |
[1-2]
Silva
(Penal)
|
|
1-2 FT |
Statistike utakmice
KARTONI 4 1
KARTONI 3 0
KVOTE
Utakmica | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Početne kvote | 190 | 200 | 140 | ||
Kvote prije utakmice | 190 | 200 | 140 |
Azijski hendikep | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linija | 1 | 2 | Linija |
+0 | 106 | -141 | -0 |
Golovi | ||
---|---|---|
Linija | Ispod | Preko |
2.5 | -227 | 170 |
Sastavi
Status: Potvrđena postava
Hercílio Luz
Status: Potvrđena postava
Novorizontino
Sastavi
Statistike:
KLUPA
Hercílio Luz
Novorizontino
-
Trener se mora nositi s 3 svježim odsutnostima
Prema vijestima, tim je bez 3 svježe odsutnosti. Ovi igrači se pridružuju popisu odsutnih: Carlinhos, Carlão, Almeida.
Sažetak
H2H
H2H (DOMA/GOST)
FORMA
FORMA (DOMA/GOST)
Snaga tima
Usporedba
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/10/19 |
Novorizontino
|
1-0 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0-0 | 9 - 6 | 2- 2 | 91 - 66 | 6 - 3 |
2 (82%) 1 (83%) |
-189 | 300 | 450 |
Forma tima
Hercílio Luz Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 |
Itaboraí
|
0 - 1 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0-0 | 15 - 7 | 3 - 5 | 89 - 51 | 5 - 0 |
1 (83%) 2 (73%) |
130 | 210 | 200 | |
19.5 |
Hercílio Luz
|
1 - 0 |
Itaboraí
|
1-0 | 4 - 10 | 2 - 0 | 76 - 91 | 3 - 3 |
1 (25%) 1 (15%) |
-137 | 250 | 350 | |
10.5 |
Novorizontino
|
1 - 0 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0-0 | 9 - 6 | 2 - 2 | 91 - 66 | 6 - 3 |
2 (82%) 1 (83%) |
-189 | 300 | 450 | |
5.5 |
Hercílio Luz
|
2 - 1 |
Tupi
|
2-0 | 13 - 8 | 5 - 3 | 78 - 89 | 2 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
100 | 230 | 220 | |
7.4 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0 - 1 |
Criciúma
|
0-0 | 9 - 8 | 2 - 3 | 48 - 37 | 7 - 4 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
240 | 250 | -110 | |
3.4 |
Marcílio Dias
|
2 - 2 |
Hercílio Luz
|
1-0 | 14 - 14 | 5 - 6 | 57 - 56 | 5 - 9 |
1 (73%) 2 (54%) |
-133 | 250 | 320 |
Novorizontino Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24.5 |
Novorizontino
|
1 - 1 |
Tupi
|
0-0 | 19 - 3 | 4 - 1 | 123 - 45 | 13 - 1 |
1 (80%) 1 (55%) |
-303 | 320 | 850 | |
18.5 |
Tupi
|
0 - 2 |
Novorizontino
|
0-2 | 13 - 12 | 4 - 5 | 64 - 64 | 4 - 7 |
4 (40%) 1 (81%) |
300 | 230 | -133 | |
10.5 |
Novorizontino
|
1 - 0 |
Hercílio Luz
|
0-0 | 9 - 6 | 2 - 2 | 91 - 66 | 6 - 3 |
2 (82%) 1 (83%) |
-189 | 300 | 450 | |
5.5 |
Itaboraí
|
1 - 1 |
Novorizontino
|
1-1 | 9 - 13 | 2 - 4 | 55 - 94 | 4 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.3 |
Palmeiras
|
5 - 0 |
Novorizontino
|
2-0 | 11 - 7 | 7 - 3 | 65 - 39 | 7 - 7 |
3 (49%) 0 (67%) |
-303 | 375 | 900 | |
23.3 |
Novorizontino
|
1 - 1 |
Palmeiras
|
1-0 | 10 - 14 | 5 - 8 | 48 - 68 | 3 - 10 |
10 (62%) 10 (47%) |
650 | 230 | -200 |
Poredak
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |