Pregled utakmice
MATCH REPORT
Brazil - Serie D - 05/20/18 18:00 - 5.Kolo
4-3 [90‘]
4-3 [90‘]
Fubá
|
3‘ | |
3‘ |
Balotelli
|
|
Lagoa
[1-0]
|
10‘ | |
Herbert
|
10‘ | |
Gian
|
11‘ | |
Lagoa
[2-0]
|
20‘ | |
23‘ |
2-1
Henrique
|
|
Sena
|
26‘ | |
Tiago
|
28‘ | |
Kellyton
|
36‘ | |
45‘+1 |
Dieguinho
|
|
HT | ||
46‘ |
Sampaio
Marlon
|
|
48‘ |
Robinho
|
|
Luizinho
[3-1]
|
53‘ | |
Pages
|
54‘ | |
55‘ |
Apis
Robinho
|
|
64‘ |
3-2
Raniel
|
|
75‘ |
Matheus
|
|
Pages
Jean
|
77‘ | |
78‘ |
Julinho
Ailton
|
|
81‘ |
3-3
Dieguinho
|
|
(Propušten penal)
Unknown
|
86‘ | |
Sena
Tojo
|
86‘ | |
88‘ |
Henrique
|
|
Lagoa
Alessandro
|
88‘ | |
Luizinho
|
90‘+3 | |
Luizinho
[4-3]
|
90‘+4 | |
4-3 FT |
Statistike utakmice
KARTONI 7 0
KARTONI 5 0
KVOTE
Sastavi
Status: Potvrđena postava
Inter de Lages
Status: Potvrđena postava
Nova Iguaçu
Sastavi
Statistike:
KLUPA
Inter de Lages
Nova Iguaçu
-
Trener se mora nositi s 3 svježim odsutnostima
Prema vijestima, tim je bez 3 svježe odsutnosti. Ovi igrači se pridružuju popisu odsutnih: Cezar, Iuri, Luam.
Sažetak
H2H
H2H (DOMA/GOST)
FORMA
FORMA (DOMA/GOST)
Snaga tima
Usporedba
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/28/18 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0-1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 21 - 4 | 5- 1 | 78 - 21 | 12 - 3 |
4 (54%) 2 (82%) |
- | - | - |
Forma tima
Inter de Lages Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.5 |
Mirassol
|
2 - 0 |
Inter de Lages
|
1-0 | 27 - 6 | 11 - 2 | 38 - 26 | 8 - 4 |
1 (40%) 0 (46%) |
- | - | - | |
7.5 |
Inter de Lages
|
1 - 0 |
Mirassol
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (40%) 0 (36%) |
- | - | - | |
28.4 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 21 - 4 | 5 - 1 | 78 - 21 | 12 - 3 |
4 (54%) 2 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
22.4 |
Inter de Lages
|
0 - 3 |
Caxias
|
0-0 | 4 - 22 | 2 - 11 | 19 - 35 | 4 - 9 |
0 (0%) 6 (45%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
Brusque
|
1 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
2 (75%) 4 (51%) |
- | - | - | |
28.3 |
Inter de Lages
|
1 - 0 |
Atlético Tubarão
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
2 (74%) 1 (71%) |
- | - | - |
Nova Iguaçu Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.5 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0 - 1 |
Caxias
|
11 - 9 | 1 - 4 | 77 - 50 | 5 - 1 |
1 (59%) 2 (62%) |
- | - | - | ||
6.5 |
Caxias
|
4 - 1 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
11 - 7 | 4 - 2 | 59 - 61 | 6 - 6 |
2 (68%) 4 (51%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.4 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0 - 1 |
Inter de Lages
|
0-0 | 21 - 4 | 5 - 1 | 78 - 21 | 12 - 3 |
4 (54%) 2 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
22.4 |
Mirassol
|
1 - 0 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
1-0 | 11 - 5 | 3 - 1 | 53 - 57 | 4 - 1 |
0 (0%) 5 (53%) |
- | - | - | |
18.3 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
0 - 2 |
Macaé
|
0-1 | 8 - 7 | 0 - 5 | 66 - 27 | 13 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.3 |
Fluminense
|
2 - 1 |
Nova Iguaçu
|
2-0 | 9 - 3 | 2 - 1 | 63 - 36 | 9 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Poredak
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14:8 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
2. | Rio Branco | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Macapá | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7:16 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
4. | Baré | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:8 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:4 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 17% | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:9 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Dom Bosco | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Sinop | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.2 | 3.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Novoperário | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Ceilândia | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 67% | 2.5 | 6.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Macaé | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:8 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 83% | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Itumbiara | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.8 | 4.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Espírito Santo | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:12 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Uberlândia | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10:7 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 83% | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Novorizontino | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:9 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Americano | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:11 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Itapemirim | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | CA Linense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.0 | 6.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 1.8 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Madureira | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6:7 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.8 | 3.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Caldense | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:7 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Caxias | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13:2 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 33% | 2.2 | 5.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Inter de Lages | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:11 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.8 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Mirassol | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Nova Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:11 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 2.7 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Novo Hamburgo | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.2 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Cianorte | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:5 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 17% | 4.0 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
4. | Ferroviária | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | EC São José | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10:4 | 18 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Brusque | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.2 | 7.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Prudentópolis | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6:8 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Mogi Mirim | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:14 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 83% | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Independente PA | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:7 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Santos AP | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Plácido de Castro | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8:19 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 83% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 4.50 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Nacional AM | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:4 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:11 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7:10 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 83% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Ferroviário | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Cordino | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.8 | 3.2 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | 4 de Julho | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3:5 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 83% | 2.0 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
2. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
3. | Sparta | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 67% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | ASSU | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:6 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 17% | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11:6 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.2 | 6.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
2. | Imperatriz | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.0 | 7.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Belo Jardim | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6:12 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Guarani de Juazeiro | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8:14 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 83% | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Sergipe | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | Jacuipense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:8 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
3. | Central | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | ASA | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7:11 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.8 | 7.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Campinense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12:3 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 50% | 1.5 | 6.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
2. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
3. | Flamengo Arcoverde | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
4. | Murici | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4:16 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 67% | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | Treze | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Itabaiana | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
3. | Vitória da Conquista | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | Santa Rita | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Situacija u kupu
Natjecanja | |
---|---|
Catarinense 2
vs Concórdia Atlético Clube 06/01/19
|
Regular Season |