Previa del partido
MATCH REPORT
Brasil - Serie D - 06/02/19 15:00 - 5.Ronda
2-2 [90‘]
2-2 [90‘]
16‘ |
0-1
Vyctor
|
|
19‘ |
Carlão
|
|
22‘ |
0-2
Alisson
|
|
Marquinho
[1-2]
|
23‘ | |
28‘ |
Regineldo
|
|
Audálio
|
41‘ | |
1-2 HT | ||
Traque
Kanu
|
46‘ | |
Henrique
Cris
|
59‘ | |
Maceió
|
59‘ | |
Marquinho
Flávio
|
70‘ | |
Mondragon
|
70‘ | |
76‘ |
Tavares
Vyctor
|
|
76‘ |
Aquiraz
Renê
|
|
Roney
[2-2]
|
81‘ | |
88‘ |
Barbosa
Eugenio
|
|
Roney
|
90‘+1 | |
90‘+1 |
Marconi
|
|
2-2 FT |
Estadísticas del partido
TARJETAS 3 1
TARJETAS 2 1
CUOTAS
Partido | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Cuotas iniciales | -110 | 220 | 260 | ||
Cuotas antes del partido | -110 | 220 | 260 |
Hándicap asiático | |||
---|---|---|---|
Línea | 1 | 2 | Línea |
+0 | -233 | 170 | -0 |
Goles | ||
---|---|---|
Línea | Menos de | Más de |
2.5 | -143 | 110 |
Alineaciones
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Ríver
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Floresta
Alineaciones
Estadísticas:
BANQUILLO
Ríver
Floresta
-
El entrenador tiene que lidiar con 5 nuevas ausencias
Según las noticias, el equipo está sin 5 nueva ausencia. Estos jugadores se unen a la lista de ausencias: Canga, Bryan, Lobo, Kalyel, Douglas.
Resumen
H2H
H2H (CASA/FUERA)
FORMA
FORMA (CASA/FUERA)
Fuerza del equipo
Enfrentamientos directos
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/11/19 |
Floresta
|
0-0 |
Ríver
|
0-0 | 17 - 10 | 4- 2 | 43 - 25 | 8 - 2 |
3 (67%) 0 (70%) |
- | - | - |
Forma del equipo
Ríver Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN
|
2 - 2 |
Ríver
|
1-0 | 13 - 11 | 8 - 2 | 36 - 38 | 4 - 5 |
1 (50%) 1 (75%) |
160 | 230 | 145 | |
19.5 |
Ríver
|
5 - 2 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN
|
2-0 | 13 - 16 | 7 - 4 | 56 - 51 | 7 - 7 |
3 (62%) 2 (36%) |
-137 | 250 | 333 | |
11.5 |
Floresta
|
0 - 0 |
Ríver
|
0-0 | 17 - 10 | 4 - 2 | 43 - 25 | 8 - 2 |
3 (67%) 0 (70%) |
- | - | - | |
5.5 |
Ríver
|
1 - 0 |
Bragantino PA
|
1-0 | 15 - 4 | 6 - 1 | 59 - 57 | 5 - 5 |
6 (45%) 4 (29%) |
- | - | - | |
13.4 |
Ríver
|
3 - 0 |
Altos
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (64%) 5 (37%) |
- | - | - | |
10.4 |
Altos
|
2 - 3 |
Ríver
|
2-1 | 8 - 6 | 2 - 4 | 65 - 51 | 13 - 1 |
0 (39%) 2 (59%) |
- | - | - |
Floresta Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25.5 |
Floresta
|
3 - 1 |
Bragantino PA
|
2-0 | 9 - 5 | 4 - 5 | 85 - 55 | 4 - 7 |
2 (68%) 2 (49%) |
145 | 220 | 163 | |
19.5 |
Bragantino PA
|
3 - 2 |
Floresta
|
2-2 | 13 - 13 | 5 - 4 | 35 - 22 | 1 - 3 |
4 (42%) 2 (70%) |
120 | 190 | 220 | |
11.5 |
Floresta
|
0 - 0 |
Ríver
|
0-0 | 17 - 10 | 4 - 2 | 43 - 25 | 8 - 2 |
3 (67%) 0 (70%) |
- | - | - | |
5.5 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN
|
1 - 1 |
Floresta
|
0-0 | 16 - 13 | 5 - 7 | 56 - 75 | 7 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
140 | 220 | 160 | |
10.4 |
Ceará
|
3 - 0 |
Floresta
|
1-0 | 8 - 4 | 4 - 2 | 49 - 49 | 5 - 8 |
8 (52%) 2 (37%) |
-250 | 350 | 550 | |
27.3 |
Floresta
|
2 - 2 |
Ceará
|
1-0 | 9 - 18 | 6 - 10 | 45 - 80 | 3 - 11 |
1 (25%) 2 (64%) |
550 | 300 | -227 |
Clasificaciones
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |