Previa del partido
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 04/30/22 10:00 - 6.Ronda
0-3 [92+2‘]
0-3 [92+2‘]
Jordan Perez Dizon
|
19‘ | |
22‘ |
0-1
Rodrigues
(Colakovski)
|
|
0-1 HT | ||
Robertson
|
56‘ | |
59‘ |
Nabbout
Colakovski
|
|
59‘ |
MacLaren
Rodrigues
|
|
68‘ |
Jenkinson
Galloway
|
|
68‘ |
0-2
MacLaren
(Nabbout)
|
|
68‘ |
Bos
Gomulka
|
|
Jordan Perez Dizon
Salenga
|
69‘ | |
Robertson
|
73‘ | |
74‘ |
MacLaren
|
|
Lyngbo
Grierson
|
81‘ | |
Ebarle
Esswein
|
81‘ | |
90‘ |
0-3
Tilio
(MacLaren)
|
|
0-3 FT |
Estadísticas del partido
TARJETAS 2 1
TARJETAS 0 0
CUOTAS
Partido | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Cuotas iniciales | 800 | 600 | -588 | ||
Cuotas antes del partido | 1200 | 750 | -714 |
Hándicap asiático | |||
---|---|---|---|
Línea | 1 | 2 | Línea |
+2.5 | -116 | 104 | -2.5 |
+2.25 | 102 | -123 | -2.25 |
+2.75 | -149 | 124 | -2.75 |
Goles | ||
---|---|---|
Línea | Menos de | Más de |
2.5 | 260 | -345 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Línea | Menos de | Más de |
10 | -120 | -102 |
Alineaciones
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Ceres Philippines
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Melbourne City
Alineaciones
Estadísticas:
BANQUILLO
Ceres Philippines
-
Stephan Schröck es una nueva ausencia
El entrenador Jason Withe está sin su jugador clave Stephan Schröck (0 partidos, 0 goles, 0 asistencias). Motivo: no disponible. Su ausencia puede ser un gran golpe para el equipo.
-
K. Hayes es una nueva ausencia
El entrenador Jason Withe está sin su jugador clave K. Hayes (5 partidos, 0 goles, 0 asistencias). Motivo: no disponible. Su ausencia puede ser un gran golpe para el equipo.
-
Malos resultados en los últimos partidos para Ceres Philippines
Mala forma en los últimos 5 partidos. No es un período fácil para los jugadores y el entrenador Jason Withe ya que el registro de forma es (1V, 0E, 4D) con su promedio de 2.4 goles concedidos por partido.
Melbourne City
-
Racha invicta (5) para Melbourne City
Melbourne City está invicto en sus últimos 5 AFC Champions League partidos (2V, 3E). Los jugadores anotaron 7 goles y concedieron 3 en esa racha.
Resumen
H2H
H2H (CASA/FUERA)
FORMA
FORMA (CASA/FUERA)
Fuerza del equipo
Enfrentamientos directos
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/18/22 |
Melbourne City
|
3-0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-0 | 21 - 4 | 10- 0 | 86 - 35 | 9 - 0 |
5 (34%) 3 (15%) |
-345 | 475 | 1000 |
Forma del equipo
Ceres Philippines Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27.4 |
Jeonnam Dragons
|
2 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0-0 | 16 - 5 | 10 - 2 | 60 - 30 | 4 - 3 |
8 (37%) 8 (19%) |
-400 | 500 | 900 | |
24.4 |
Ceres Philippines
|
3 - 1 |
BG Pathum United
|
3-0 | 14 - 16 | 4 - 5 | 60 - 67 | 5 - 4 |
1 (33%) 9 (45%) |
-588 | 700 | 1200 | |
21.4 |
BG Pathum United
|
5 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-0 | 18 - 11 | 10 - 2 | 73 - 60 | 3 - 2 |
6 (48%) 3 (24%) |
-303 | 450 | 850 | |
18.4 |
Melbourne City
|
3 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-0 | 21 - 4 | 10 - 0 | 86 - 35 | 9 - 0 |
5 (34%) 3 (15%) |
-345 | 475 | 1000 | |
15.4 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0 - 1 |
Jeonnam Dragons
|
0-0 | 2 - 11 | 1 - 3 | 49 - 69 | 2 - 8 |
8 (11%) 4 (41%) |
750 | 350 | -303 | |
11.7 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0 - 4 |
Daegu
|
0-1 | 7 - 14 | 2 - 5 | 44 - 74 | 0 - 3 |
3 (30%) 2 (56%) |
1400 | 1000 | -1667 |
Melbourne City Last 6 Matches
DES |
Tiros |
Tiros (a puerta) |
Ataque peligroso |
Saques de esquina |
Alineación Cambios |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27.4 |
Melbourne City
|
0 - 0 |
BG Pathum United
|
0-0 | 6 - 17 | 2 - 3 | 47 - 47 | 1 - 7 |
1 (67%) 6 (59%) |
200 | 240 | 138 | |
24.4 |
Jeonnam Dragons
|
1 - 1 |
Melbourne City
|
0-0 | 13 - 9 | 3 - 5 | 81 - 64 | 3 - 3 |
6 (51%) 3 (61%) |
375 | 260 | -125 | |
21.4 |
Melbourne City
|
2 - 1 |
Jeonnam Dragons
|
2-1 | 4 - 10 | 2 - 5 | 57 - 58 | 3 - 3 |
4 (61%) 7 (37%) |
-143 | 250 | 450 | |
18.4 |
Melbourne City
|
3 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-0 | 21 - 4 | 10 - 0 | 86 - 35 | 9 - 0 |
5 (34%) 3 (15%) |
-345 | 475 | 1000 | |
15.4 |
BG Pathum United
|
1 - 1 |
Melbourne City
|
1-1 | 6 - 10 | 3 - 5 | 80 - 72 | 3 - 4 |
2 (64%) 2 (64%) |
188 | 240 | 110 | |
9.4 |
Melbourne Victory
|
3 - 0 |
Melbourne City
|
3-0 | 16 - 6 | 7 - 2 | 35 - 38 | 7 - 4 |
4 (63%) 2 (69%) |
260 | 275 | -105 |
Clasificaciones
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Al Hilal | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.2 | 7.0 | 83% | 67% | 2.67 |
2. | Al Rayyan | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 50% | 2.0 | 4.2 | 83% | 50% | 2.83 |
3. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 83% | 3.8 | 4.2 | 100% | 67% | 3.00 |
4. | Istiqlol Dushanbe | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:10 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 3.0 | 67% | 50% | 2.50 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Al Shabab | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 17% | 1.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 67% | 3.17 |
2. | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 2.2 | 7.8 | 83% | 67% | 2.83 |
3. | Mumbai City | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Jazira | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4:10 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 0.8 | 3.8 | 67% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Foolad | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.5 | 4.8 | 33% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 2.0 | 3.5 | 100% | 33% | 3.50 |
3. | Al Gharafa | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 2.5 | 3.7 | 67% | 33% | 3.50 |
4. | Ahal | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 50% | 2.5 | 3.5 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Al Duhail | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17:9 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.5 | 6.3 | 83% | 83% | 4.33 |
2. | Al Taawoun | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13:12 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 2.0 | 2.3 | 83% | 67% | 4.17 |
3. | Sepahan | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:12 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 2.0 | 6.2 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 |
4. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10:15 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 3.5 | 6.0 | 83% | 83% | 4.17 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Nasaf | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.2 | 0.5 | 50% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | Al Faisaly | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5:4 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.8 | 3.5 | 50% | 17% | 1.50 |
3. | Al Sadd | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
4. | Al Wihdat | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 83% | 1.7 | 3.2 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Urawa Reds | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20:2 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 0.7 | 7.5 | 67% | 67% | 3.67 |
2. | Daegu | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14:4 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 0.0 | 1.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Home United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:14 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 83% | 83% | 3.67 |
4. | Shandong Taishan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:24 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 17% | 1.2 | 1.2 | 83% | 83% | 4.33 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | BG Pathum United | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 11:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.8 | 4.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.17 |
2. | Melbourne City | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10:3 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 83% | 50% | 2.17 |
3. | Jeonnam Dragons | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.2 | 4.2 | 67% | 17% | 1.67 |
4. | Ceres Philippines | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:17 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 17% | 1.3 | 2.8 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Yokohama F. Marinos | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.3 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
2. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 50% | 17% | 1.83 |
3. | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 67% | 17% | 1.83 |
4. | Sydney | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3:9 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.5 | 5.8 | 50% | 33% | 2.00 |
Group I | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 1.5 | 4.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
2. | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.8 | 5.0 | 67% | 50% | 3.50 |
3. | Ulsan | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.8 | 6.3 | 100% | 83% | 3.50 |
4. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0:24 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 83% | 67% | 4.00 |
Group J | |||||||||||||||
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROM G | ||
1. | Vissel Kobe | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10:3 | 8 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.25 |
2. | Kitchee | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7:6 | 7 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.25 |
3. | Singha Chiangrai United | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2:10 | 1 |
|
0.25 | 25% | 3.3 | 2.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |