Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Brasilien - Serie D - 05/26/19 15:00 - 4.Runde
1-2 [90‘]
1-2 [90‘]
42‘ |
David
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
Kenia
[1-0]
|
49‘ | |
55‘ |
Ronald
Chiquinho
|
|
55‘ |
Aurelio
Alves
|
|
55‘ |
Jacobina
|
|
Werley
Damião
|
60‘ | |
Kenia
Elson
|
65‘ | |
70‘ |
1-1
Berto
|
|
79‘ |
Gaucho
Jacobina
|
|
Tiago
Rodrigo
|
84‘ | |
90‘+3 |
1-2
Berto
|
|
1-2 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 2 0
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Interporto
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Itabaiana
Aufstellungen
Statistiken:
BANK
Interporto
-
Der Trainer muss mit 4 frischen Ausfällen umgehen
Laut Nachrichten ist das Team ohne 4 frischen Ausfall. Diese Spieler kommen zur Ausfallliste hinzu: , Arthur, Love, Bomba.
Itabaiana
-
Der Trainer muss mit 5 frischen Ausfällen umgehen
Laut Nachrichten ist das Team ohne 5 frischen Ausfall. Diese Spieler kommen zur Ausfallliste hinzu: Roni, Branco, Bruno, James, Robinho.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/20/19 |
Itabaiana
|
3-0 |
Interporto
|
1-0 | 15 - 9 | 5- 1 | 62 - 44 | 7 - 5 |
1 (57%) 7 (48%) |
-333 | 400 | 700 |
Teamform
Interporto Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23.5 |
Interporto
|
2 - 3 |
Tocantinópolis
|
22 - 19 | 8 - 7 | 44 - 45 | 5 - 5 |
11 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.5 |
Itabaiana
|
3 - 0 |
Interporto
|
1-0 | 15 - 9 | 5 - 1 | 62 - 44 | 7 - 5 |
1 (57%) 7 (48%) |
-333 | 400 | 700 | |
15.5 |
Interporto
|
2 - 0 |
Palmas
|
19 - 18 | 13 - 10 | 44 - 45 | 5 - 5 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11.5 |
Aparecidense
|
4 - 0 |
Interporto
|
2-0 | 16 - 10 | 7 - 3 | 44 - 19 | 13 - 0 |
4 (20%) 8 (26%) |
- | - | - | |
4.5 |
Interporto
|
1 - 1 |
Juazeirense
|
0-0 | 19 - 13 | 5 - 7 | 45 - 41 | 6 - 4 |
0 (0%) 7 (36%) |
163 | 250 | 125 | |
1.5 |
Alvorada Club
|
2 - 1 |
Interporto
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Itabaiana Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.5 |
Itabaiana
|
3 - 0 |
Interporto
|
1-0 | 15 - 9 | 5 - 1 | 62 - 44 | 7 - 5 |
1 (57%) 7 (48%) |
-333 | 400 | 700 | |
11.5 |
Juazeirense
|
3 - 0 |
Itabaiana
|
1-0 | 10 - 8 | 3 - 1 | 43 - 36 | 4 - 5 |
1 (70%) 0 (49%) |
- | - | - | |
6.5 |
Itabaiana
|
1 - 0 |
Aparecidense
|
0-0 | 11 - 2 | 5 - 1 | 76 - 51 | 7 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
20.4 |
Frei Paulistano
|
3 - 1 |
Itabaiana
|
2-1 | 15 - 7 | 8 - 3 | 31 - 38 | 3 - 9 |
1 (57%) 2 (59%) |
- | - | - | |
13.4 |
Itabaiana
|
1 - 2 |
Frei Paulistano
|
1-1 | 14 - 9 | 4 - 5 | 41 - 32 | 7 - 2 |
0 (53%) 0 (58%) |
- | - | - | |
6.4 |
Confiança
|
1 - 3 |
Itabaiana
|
1-0 | 15 - 16 | 5 - 6 | 38 - 31 | 4 - 6 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
-175 | 260 | 400 |
Tabellen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |