Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Deutschland - State Leagues: Westfalen - 1 - 08/11/24 09:00 - 1.Runde
Stadion
Kapazität
0
Spielfeld
Schiedsrichter
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
Peckeloh
Hiltrup
Zusammenfassung
H2H
2
2
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
1
1
FORM
0
0
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
0
0
Teamstärke
0%
Durchschnittliche gespielte Minuten (letzte 6)
0%
0
Änderungen (im Vergleich zum letzten Spiel)
0
0
Frische wichtige Ausfälle
0
0
Ausfälle
0
Kopf-an-Kopf
20%
80%
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/05/24 |
Peckeloh
|
0-2 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
10/29/23 |
Hiltrup
|
1-0 |
Peckeloh
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
03/05/23 |
Peckeloh
|
1-1 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0- 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
09/04/22 |
Hiltrup
|
0-0 |
Peckeloh
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamform
0.00
0.67 (+0%) total
1.33 (+33%) total
1.00
Peckeloh Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.8 |
Avenwedde
|
0 - 2 |
Peckeloh
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
16.7 |
Peckeloh
|
1 - 4 |
SC Wiedenbrück
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (51%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.5 |
Borussia Emsdetten
|
2 - 2 |
Peckeloh
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.5 |
Peckeloh
|
1 - 3 |
Grün-Weiß Nottuln
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
12.5 |
Bockum-Hövel
|
4 - 0 |
Peckeloh
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
5.5 |
Peckeloh
|
0 - 2 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Hiltrup Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 |
Bockum-Hövel
|
6 - 1 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.5 |
Hiltrup
|
1 - 1 |
Hammer SpVg
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
12.5 |
Hiltrup
|
2 - 0 |
Nieheim
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
5.5 |
Peckeloh
|
0 - 2 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.4 |
Hiltrup
|
1 - 1 |
Preussen Espelkamp
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.4 |
Westfalia Kinderhaus
|
2 - 1 |
Hiltrup
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Westfalen - 1 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Hiltrup | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 17:11 | 21 |
|
2.00 | 46% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.15 |
2. | RW Maaslingen | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 20:12 | 21 |
|
2.13 | 46% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.46 |
3. | Peckeloh | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 15:8 | 22 |
|
1.88 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.77 |
4. | Preussen Espelkamp | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13:9 | 21 |
|
2.00 | 31% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.69 |
5. | Borussia Emsdetten | 13 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 10:7 | 18 |
|
1.63 | 31% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.31 |
6. | Rödinghausen II | 13 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 16:13 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 46% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.23 |
7. | Westfalia Soest | 13 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 16:15 | 17 |
|
1.50 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.38 |
8. | Ostinghausen | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 21:23 | 20 |
|
1.63 | 57% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.14 |
9. | Mesum | 13 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 17:22 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 54% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
10. | Rheda | 13 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 15:8 | 20 |
|
1.63 | 23% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.77 |
11. | Grün-Weiß Nottuln | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 23:29 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
12. | Westfalia Kinderhaus | 13 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 16:15 | 13 |
|
0.75 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.38 |
13. | Neuenkirchen | 13 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 14:25 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 46% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
14. | Delbrücker SC | 14 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 12:18 | 13 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.14 |
15. | Bockum-Hövel | 13 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 6:15 | 10 |
|
0.63 | 38% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.62 |
16. | Nieheim | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 15:16 | 12 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.21 |