Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Brasilien - Serie D - 06/23/19 15:00
2-1 [90+60‘]
2-1 [90+60‘]
Elves
|
15‘ | |
Zizu
|
18‘ | |
0-0 HT | ||
Dan
Rafinha
|
46‘ | |
Caio
|
54‘ | |
Elves
|
59‘ | |
Caio
Olavio
|
60‘ | |
61‘ |
Capanema
|
|
Sobral
Rondallys
|
66‘ | |
69‘ |
Leonardo
Edgar
|
|
Danielzinho
[1-0]
|
77‘ | |
77‘ |
Keoma
Capanema
|
|
80‘ |
Kaique
Rafinha
|
|
Rômulo
[2-0]
|
85‘ | |
Rondallys
|
89‘ | |
Zuba
|
89‘ | |
90‘+2 |
2-1
Mauro
|
|
2-1 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 4 1
KARTEN 1 0
QUOTEN
Spiel | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Eröffnungsquoten | -227 | 320 | 500 | ||
Vor dem Spiel Quoten | -227 | 320 | 500 |
Tore | ||
---|---|---|
Linie | Unter | Über |
2.5 | 110 | -143 |
Aufstellungen
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
FC Atlético Cearense
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Bragantino PA
Aufstellungen
Statistiken:
BANK
FC Atlético Cearense
Bragantino PA
-
Bragantino PA hat gute Form in den letzten 5 Spielen
Trainer Samuel Candido kann mit der Form seines Teams (4S, 0U, 1N) aus den letzten 5 Spielen zufrieden sein.
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (3) für Bragantino PA
Bragantino PA ist in den letzten 3 Serie D Spielen ungeschlagen (3S, 0U). Die Spieler erzielten 7 Tore und kassierten 0 in dieser Serie.
-
Der Trainer muss mit 4 frischen Ausfällen umgehen
Laut Nachrichten ist das Team ohne 4 frischen Ausfall. Diese Spieler kommen zur Ausfallliste hinzu: de Tárcio, Levy, Fidelis, Arian.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/16/19 |
Bragantino PA
|
3-0 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
0-0 | 14 - 7 | 8- 2 | 21 - 20 | 11 - 3 |
2 (62%) 5 (82%) |
- | - | - |
Teamform
FC Atlético Cearense Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16.6 |
Bragantino PA
|
3 - 0 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
0-0 | 14 - 7 | 8 - 2 | 21 - 20 | 11 - 3 |
2 (62%) 5 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
9.6 |
Central
|
1 - 0 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
0-0 | 10 - 3 | 2 - 1 | 98 - 35 | 8 - 2 |
1 (73%) 4 (45%) |
-175 | 280 | 500 | |
1.6 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
1 - 0 |
Altos
|
1-0 | 12 - 7 | 5 - 2 | 52 - 68 | 5 - 9 |
1 (53%) 1 (61%) |
100 | 240 | 225 | |
24.5 |
Maranhão
|
1 - 2 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
1-1 | 2 - 2 | 2 - 2 | 38 - 21 | 8 - 5 |
3 (59%) 1 (52%) |
138 | 260 | 138 | |
18.5 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
4 - 3 |
Maranhão
|
2-0 | 8 - 10 | 6 - 6 | 60 - 66 | 5 - 4 |
1 (41%) 4 (55%) |
-250 | 320 | 550 | |
12.5 |
Altos
|
1 - 4 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
0-2 | 11 - 9 | 3 - 6 | 73 - 56 | 6 - 4 |
4 (54%) 1 (28%) |
- | - | - |
Bragantino PA Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16.6 |
Bragantino PA
|
3 - 0 |
FC Atlético Cearense
|
0-0 | 14 - 7 | 8 - 2 | 21 - 20 | 11 - 3 |
2 (62%) 5 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
9.6 |
Bragantino PA
|
1 - 0 |
Ríver
|
0-0 | 12 - 15 | 3 - 5 | 22 - 14 | 3 - 4 |
2 (61%) 5 (55%) |
105 | 240 | 225 | |
3.6 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN
|
0 - 3 |
Bragantino PA
|
0-0 | 15 - 13 | 5 - 6 | 59 - 71 | 4 - 3 |
3 (43%) 3 (63%) |
125 | 230 | 190 | |
25.5 |
Floresta
|
3 - 1 |
Bragantino PA
|
2-0 | 9 - 5 | 4 - 5 | 85 - 55 | 4 - 7 |
2 (68%) 2 (49%) |
145 | 220 | 163 | |
19.5 |
Bragantino PA
|
3 - 2 |
Floresta
|
2-2 | 13 - 13 | 5 - 4 | 35 - 22 | 1 - 3 |
4 (42%) 2 (70%) |
120 | 190 | 220 | |
12.5 |
Bragantino PA
|
0 - 1 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN
|
0-0 | 10 - 8 | 5 - 2 | 49 - 22 | 4 - 2 |
5 (38%) 1 (28%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | São Raimundo RR | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15:6 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Fast Clube | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Barcelona RO | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:10 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Rio Branco | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:16 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Iporá | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Sinop | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
3. | Corumbaense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Palmas | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9:7 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | União Rondonópolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10:9 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Anapolina | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6:6 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
4. | Operário MS | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:9 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Caldense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Vitória ES | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:6 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Sobradinho | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Brasiliense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5:2 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
2. | Ituano | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | URT | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2:3 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.83 |
4. | Serra | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1:11 | 2 |
|
0.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Novorizontino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13:3 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2. | Hercílio Luz | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5:6 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
3. | Itaboraí | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Brusque | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Boavista | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 67% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Gaucho | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5:8 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Foz do Iguaçu | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3:13 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Cianorte | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 17% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Caxias | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | São Caetano | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7:7 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
4. | Atlético Tubarão | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:13 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Avenida | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
2. | Ferroviária | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:3 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
3. | Maringá | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | 8 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.50 |
4. | Joinville | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3:4 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.17 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Manaus | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:7 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 83% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 3.83 |
2. | Real Ariquemes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
3. | Galvez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10:12 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
4. | Santos AP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:10 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Moto Club MA | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16:4 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
2. | São Raimundo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12:7 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
3. | Ypiranga AP | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Atlético Roraima | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:15 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Floresta | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Ríver | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Bragantino PA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |
4. | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:14 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | FC Atlético Cearense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12:6 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
2. | Central | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10:7 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | Altos | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
4. | Maranhão | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10:16 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | América RN | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20:1 | 14 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
3. | América PE | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
4. | Serrano PB | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2:28 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 5.00 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Jacuipense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11:2 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 17% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
2. | ASA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 0% | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
3. | Campinense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:5 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 0% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
4. | Acadêmica Vitória | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3:16 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Fluminense de Feira | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8:4 | 12 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Salgueiro | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:6 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
3. | Sergipe | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
4. | Coruripe | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2:9 | 4 |
|
0.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 1.83 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Itabaiana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 33% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
2. | Juazeirense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8:4 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Aparecidense | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8:5 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
4. | Interporto | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2:13 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.50 |