Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Vereinigte Staaten - USL W League - 06/16/24 19:30
QUOTEN
Spiel | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Eröffnungsquoten | -227 | 350 | 400 | ||
Vor dem Spiel Quoten | -227 | 350 | 400 |
Tore | ||
---|---|---|
Linie | Unter | Über |
2.5 | 200 | -278 |
Aufstellungen
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (3) für Chattanooga Red Wolves W
Chattanooga Red Wolves W ist in den letzten 3 USL W League Spielen ungeschlagen (1S, 2U). Die Spieler erzielten 9 Tore und kassierten 0 in dieser Serie.
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Chattanooga Red Wolves W
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer , da die Formbilanz (1S, 3U, 1N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 0.6 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
Birmingham Legion W
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Birmingham Legion W
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer , da die Formbilanz (1S, 3U, 1N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1.2 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
-
Sieglos-Serie (4) Spiele
Birmingham Legion W hat 4 Spiele in Folge nicht gewonnen. Der letzte Sieg war gegen Athens United W (1-2) am 22.5.24
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/04/24 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
0-0 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
06/17/23 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
0-2 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
06/04/23 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
4-1 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamform
Chattanooga Red Wolves W Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.6 |
Tennessee SC W
|
0 - 0 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.6 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
0 - 0 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
31.5 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
9 - 0 |
Athens United W
|
5-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 87 - 21 | 15 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.5 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
1 - 2 |
Asheville City W
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
23.5 |
SSA Soccer W
|
1 - 1 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
19.5 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 |
Greenville Triumph W
|
0-0 | 14 - 6 | 8 - 2 | 115 - 52 | 8 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-149 | 275 | 300 |
Birmingham Legion W Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.6 |
Tennessee SC W
|
0 - 0 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
21 - 4 | 9 - 0 | 55 - 25 | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
8.6 |
SSA Soccer W
|
3 - 1 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
3-1 | 16 - 19 | 6 - 5 | 59 - 77 | 5 - 10 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
110 | 275 | 170 | |
4.6 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
0 - 0 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves W
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
31.5 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
2 - 2 |
SSA Soccer W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
22.5 |
Athens United W
|
1 - 2 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
18.5 |
Asheville City W
|
3 - 0 |
Birmingham Legion W
|
0-0 | 10 - 5 | 6 - 3 | 48 - 20 | 5 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-110 | 333 | 180 |
Tabellen
Southern Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lone Star Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | AHFC Royals W | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 32:3 | 24 |
|
2.25 | 30% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.50 |
2. | Challenge W | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11:12 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 30% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.30 |
3. | San Antonio Athenians W | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19:14 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 40% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.30 |
3. | Lonestar II W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
4. | Lonestar II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21:23 | 11 |
|
1.00 | 80% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.40 |
5. | Houston Sur W | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6:37 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.30 |
South Central Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Tennessee SC W | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 42:14 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 0.4 | 1.8 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
2. | Asheville City W | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 28:13 | 26 |
|
2.13 | 50% | 0.2 | 3.8 | 100% | 88% | 3.42 |
3. | Chattanooga Red Wolves W | 12 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 18:8 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 42% | 0.3 | 2.0 | 17% | 17% | 2.17 |
4. | SSA Soccer W | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 23:17 | 14 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 0.1 | 1.8 | 90% | 65% | 3.33 |
5. | Greenville Triumph W | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7:10 | 13 |
|
1.13 | 17% | 0.4 | 2.9 | 38% | 38% | 1.42 |
6. | Birmingham Legion W | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 13:14 | 16 |
|
1.13 | 42% | 0.0 | 0.8 | 100% | 100% | 2.25 |
7. | Athens United W | 12 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 3:58 | 4 |
|
0.38 | 17% | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 5.08 |
Southeast Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Florida Elite SA W | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 53:6 | 30 |
|
2.25 | 25% | 0.3 | 2.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.92 |
2. | Tampa Bay United W | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 34:10 | 21 |
|
1.75 | 36% | 0.3 | 1.4 | 100% | 65% | 4.00 |
3. | Palm City Americanas W | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 24:14 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 45% | 0.4 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 3.45 |
4. | Miami AC W | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 28:14 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 45% | 0.3 | 3.4 | 100% | 83% | 3.82 |
5. | TLH Reckoning W | 12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 11:25 | 13 |
|
1.13 | 42% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
6. | Brooke House W | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10:46 | 8 |
|
0.63 | 42% | 0.3 | 1.8 | 92% | 73% | 4.67 |
7. | Brevard Riptide W | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8:37 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
8. | Swan City W | 12 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14:30 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 58% | 0.4 | 0.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |