Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Brasilien - Serie D - 06/24/23 16:00 - 10.Runde
1-1 [100+10‘]
1-1 [100+10‘]
Hugo
|
16‘ | |
Johnny
[1-0]
|
45‘+2 | |
1-0 HT | ||
58‘ |
Joanderson
Batatinha
|
|
58‘ |
Gaspar
Renan
|
|
da Silva
Travassos
|
69‘ | |
Figueira
Kiko
|
69‘ | |
Luiz
|
69‘ | |
71‘ |
Gomes
Ferrugem
|
|
71‘ |
Lucas
Rodrigues
|
|
78‘ |
Libano
Lima
|
|
Juninho
Dip
|
79‘ | |
Johnny
Alexandro
|
79‘ | |
Correia
Ramos
|
89‘ | |
90‘ |
1-1
Gama
|
|
Alexandro
|
90‘+7 | |
1-1 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 1 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Spiel | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Eröffnungsquoten | 163 | 188 | 163 | ||
Vor dem Spiel Quoten | 190 | 190 | 138 |
Asiatisches Handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linie | 1 | 2 | Linie |
+0 | 106 | -135 | -0 |
+0.25 | -149 | 107 | -0.25 |
-0.25 | 143 | -204 | +0.25 |
Tore | ||
---|---|---|
Linie | Unter | Über |
2.5 | -167 | 130 |
Aufstellungen
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Operário MS
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Cascavel
Aufstellungen
Statistiken:
BANK
Operário MS
-
Schlechte Ergebnisse in den letzten Spielen für Operário MS
Schlechte Form in den letzten 5 Spielen. Keine leichte Zeit für die Spieler und Trainer Celso Luiz Ferreira Rodrigues, da die Formbilanz (1S, 1U, 3N) mit ihrem Durchschnitt von 1.8 Gegentoren pro Spiel ist.
-
3 Spiele in Folge verloren. Zeit für taktische Änderungen?
Schlechte Phase für Operário MS. Trainer Celso Luiz Ferreira Rodrigues kann mit 3 Spielen in Folge Niederlagen nicht zufrieden sein. Es ist sehr wahrscheinlich, dass der Trainer taktische Änderungen vornehmen wird.
Cascavel
-
Keine frischen Verletzungen, gleiche Startelf?
Der Trainer kann die gleiche letzte Startelf verwenden, da keine größeren Ausfälle für dieses Spiel gemeldet sind.
-
Zweiter Ausfall für Douglas
Trainer Leston do Nascimento Junior ist immer noch ohne seinen Schlüsselspieler Douglas (2 Spiele, 0 Tore, 0 Assists). Grund: nicht verfügbar.
-
Victor Daniel ist ein frischer Ausfall
Trainer Leston do Nascimento Junior ist ohne seinen Schlüsselspieler Victor Daniel (3 Spiele, 1 Tore, 0 Assists). Grund: nicht verfügbar. Seine Abwesenheit kann ein großer Schlag für das Team sein.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/03/23 |
Cascavel
|
1-1 |
Operário MS
|
1-0 | 21 - 11 | 5- 4 | 106 - 75 | 8 - 2 |
0 (54%) 2 (29%) |
-161 | 260 | 350 |
Teamform
Operário MS Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17.6 |
Inter de Limeira
|
2 - 1 |
Operário MS
|
1-1 | 12 - 11 | 4 - 5 | 87 - 74 | 5 - 0 |
1 (45%) 2 (47%) |
-189 | 275 | 425 | |
14.6 |
Operário MS
|
0 - 2 |
CRAC
|
0-0 | 5 - 4 | 2 - 1 | 24 - 21 | 7 - 4 |
3 (42%) 6 (63%) |
220 | 150 | 160 | |
10.6 |
CRAC
|
4 - 0 |
Operário MS
|
1-0 | 12 - 14 | 6 - 5 | 85 - 73 | 4 - 4 |
2 (62%) 3 (37%) |
-143 | 220 | 375 | |
7.6 |
Operário MS
|
1 - 0 |
Inter de Limeira
|
0-0 | 8 - 8 | 5 - 4 | 56 - 53 | 4 - 7 |
1 (32%) 4 (34%) |
170 | 170 | 170 | |
3.6 |
Cascavel
|
1 - 1 |
Operário MS
|
1-0 | 21 - 11 | 5 - 4 | 106 - 75 | 8 - 2 |
0 (54%) 2 (29%) |
-161 | 260 | 350 | |
27.5 |
Maringá
|
2 - 0 |
Operário MS
|
0-0 | 19 - 4 | 6 - 0 | 57 - 28 | 8 - 5 |
1 (39%) 2 (22%) |
-182 | 230 | 475 |
Cascavel Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18.6 |
Cascavel
|
2 - 1 |
XV de Piracicaba
|
2-1 | 12 - 8 | 7 - 3 | 34 - 47 | 2 - 4 |
1 (64%) 2 (55%) |
100 | 200 | 275 | |
14.6 |
Ferroviária
|
1 - 0 |
Cascavel
|
0-0 | 15 - 11 | 3 - 2 | 93 - 90 | 2 - 6 |
2 (50%) 4 (59%) |
-200 | 240 | 600 | |
10.6 |
Cascavel
|
1 - 5 |
Ferroviária
|
0-4 | 15 - 11 | 8 - 6 | 59 - 31 | 12 - 6 |
2 (62%) 2 (46%) |
130 | 170 | 230 | |
7.6 |
XV de Piracicaba
|
1 - 2 |
Cascavel
|
0-1 | 22 - 7 | 7 - 3 | 114 - 43 | 6 - 2 |
1 (57%) 1 (58%) |
-120 | 210 | 320 | |
3.6 |
Cascavel
|
1 - 1 |
Operário MS
|
1-0 | 21 - 11 | 5 - 4 | 106 - 75 | 8 - 2 |
0 (54%) 2 (29%) |
-161 | 260 | 350 | |
27.5 |
CAP Patrocinense
|
1 - 0 |
Cascavel
|
0-0 | 9 - 11 | 5 - 3 | 45 - 61 | 4 - 7 |
2 (34%) 1 (54%) |
125 | 175 | 225 |
Tabellen
1st Phase | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Nacional AM | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 22:7 | 30 |
|
2.13 | 36% | 2.1 | 4.9 | 71% | 36% | 2.07 |
2. | Tuna Luso | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 21:10 | 28 |
|
2.38 | 50% | 2.8 | 6.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.21 |
3. | Águia de Marabá | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 18:8 | 24 |
|
1.63 | 29% | 2.1 | 2.9 | 50% | 29% | 1.86 |
4. | Princesa Solimões | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21:13 | 19 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 1.9 | 3.4 | 79% | 43% | 2.43 |
5. | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 24:24 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 1.8 | 4.7 | 79% | 64% | 3.43 |
6. | Humaitá | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 16:21 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 2.6 | 3.1 | 71% | 43% | 2.64 |
7. | Sao Francisco | 14 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 5:33 | 9 |
|
0.38 | 14% | 1.2 | 2.1 | 64% | 43% | 2.71 |
8. | Trem | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8:19 | 8 |
|
0.50 | 29% | 1.7 | 2.3 | 50% | 36% | 1.93 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Ferroviário | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 30:6 | 36 |
|
2.25 | 43% | 2.9 | 4.4 | 71% | 29% | 2.57 |
2. | FC Atlético Cearense | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 22:15 | 23 |
|
2.13 | 64% | 2.4 | 4.5 | 93% | 50% | 2.64 |
3. | Maranhão | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 18:11 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.3 | 7.0 | 71% | 36% | 2.07 |
4. | Parnahyba | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14:23 | 17 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 2.7 | 4.7 | 86% | 43% | 2.64 |
5. | Caucaia | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 20:20 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 64% | 2.4 | 4.1 | 79% | 50% | 2.86 |
6. | Tocantinópolis | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14:15 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 3.2 | 3.5 | 64% | 21% | 2.07 |
7. | Cordino | 14 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 13:26 | 11 |
|
0.63 | 57% | 2.1 | 5.8 | 79% | 50% | 2.79 |
8. | Fluminense PI | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 9:24 | 8 |
|
0.38 | 50% | 2.7 | 3.7 | 86% | 36% | 2.36 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Sousa | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 24:15 | 26 |
|
2.13 | 71% | 2.5 | 5.0 | 79% | 64% | 2.79 |
2. | Nacional de Patos | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 17:11 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 36% | 1.8 | 3.5 | 50% | 36% | 2.00 |
3. | Potiguar Mossoró | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 16:11 | 23 |
|
1.63 | 43% | 2.4 | 4.0 | 64% | 29% | 1.93 |
4. | Pacajus | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 21:16 | 22 |
|
1.38 | 50% | 2.4 | 4.6 | 71% | 50% | 2.64 |
5. | Campinense | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 18:14 | 21 |
|
1.75 | 43% | 2.6 | 4.9 | 57% | 50% | 2.29 |
6. | Santa Cruz | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:12 | 20 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 2.9 | 5.9 | 57% | 36% | 1.93 |
7. | Iguatu | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 16:19 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 2.3 | 3.9 | 64% | 64% | 2.50 |
8. | Globo | 14 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5:34 | 4 |
|
0.00 | 21% | 3.6 | 4.1 | 86% | 57% | 2.79 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Retrô | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 19:13 | 26 |
|
1.75 | 79% | 2.1 | 4.9 | 79% | 43% | 2.29 |
2. | Bahia de Feira | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 15:9 | 21 |
|
1.50 | 36% | 2.5 | 5.6 | 43% | 36% | 1.71 |
3. | ASA | 14 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 14:16 | 19 |
|
1.25 | 43% | 2.4 | 4.5 | 57% | 36% | 2.14 |
4. | Falcon | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 16:15 | 19 |
|
1.75 | 57% | 1.9 | 5.6 | 64% | 36% | 2.21 |
5. | Sergipe | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 19:19 | 19 |
|
1.25 | 71% | 2.3 | 6.1 | 79% | 57% | 2.71 |
6. | Cruzeiro Arapiraca | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 13:22 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 2.4 | 2.6 | 79% | 50% | 2.50 |
7. | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 15:18 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 2.3 | 3.3 | 57% | 50% | 2.36 |
8. | Jacuipense | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 20:19 | 15 |
|
0.88 | 64% | 2.4 | 5.1 | 71% | 50% | 2.79 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Ceilândia | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 28:5 | 28 |
|
2.00 | 29% | 1.8 | 5.1 | 71% | 36% | 2.36 |
2. | Anápolis | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 26:6 | 25 |
|
1.63 | 29% | 2.1 | 4.1 | 50% | 29% | 2.29 |
3. | Operário Ltda | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 29:16 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 36% | 3.1 | 4.1 | 93% | 50% | 3.21 |
4. | Brasiliense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 31:11 | 24 |
|
2.00 | 36% | 1.6 | 2.1 | 64% | 43% | 3.00 |
5. | União Rondonópolis | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 17:9 | 23 |
|
1.63 | 7% | 1.9 | 4.8 | 64% | 36% | 1.86 |
6. | Iporá | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 20:20 | 16 |
|
0.88 | 43% | 2.4 | 4.1 | 79% | 43% | 2.86 |
7. | Interporto | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 3:47 | 6 |
|
0.25 | 14% | 2.0 | 1.4 | 79% | 43% | 3.57 |
8. | Real Ariquemes | 14 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 4:44 | 5 |
|
0.50 | 21% | 1.7 | 1.5 | 71% | 50% | 3.43 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Athletic Club | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 19:9 | 29 |
|
2.13 | 36% | 3.1 | 5.2 | 43% | 43% | 2.00 |
2. | Portuguesa RJ | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 25:12 | 29 |
|
1.63 | 50% | 3.7 | 4.6 | 57% | 50% | 2.64 |
3. | Democrata GV | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18:15 | 25 |
|
2.00 | 50% | 3.6 | 4.7 | 57% | 36% | 2.36 |
4. | Vitória ES | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 23:20 | 20 |
|
1.63 | 64% | 2.9 | 5.3 | 79% | 57% | 3.07 |
5. | Santo André | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 15:16 | 19 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 2.9 | 4.6 | 71% | 29% | 2.21 |
6. | Resende | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 12:18 | 14 |
|
0.75 | 43% | 2.6 | 5.3 | 71% | 36% | 2.14 |
7. | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 15:23 | 10 |
|
1.00 | 57% | 2.2 | 3.5 | 79% | 50% | 2.71 |
8. | Real Noroeste | 14 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 9:23 | 7 |
|
0.38 | 36% | 3.4 | 5.1 | 71% | 29% | 2.29 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | CAP Patrocinense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 16:8 | 24 |
|
1.75 | 43% | 2.8 | 3.7 | 64% | 14% | 1.71 |
2. | Maringá | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 13:8 | 24 |
|
2.13 | 36% | 2.5 | 4.4 | 43% | 14% | 1.50 |
3. | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 15:15 | 22 |
|
2.00 | 43% | 3.0 | 4.7 | 43% | 29% | 2.14 |
4. | Ferroviária | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 16:11 | 20 |
|
1.88 | 43% | 2.7 | 6.4 | 43% | 29% | 1.93 |
5. | CRAC | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 16:14 | 18 |
|
1.25 | 36% | 2.4 | 4.4 | 71% | 36% | 2.14 |
6. | XV de Piracicaba | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 20:21 | 16 |
|
0.88 | 64% | 2.6 | 3.6 | 79% | 43% | 2.93 |
7. | Cascavel | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 12:17 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 64% | 2.3 | 4.2 | 71% | 29% | 2.07 |
8. | Operário MS | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 5:19 | 8 |
|
0.13 | 29% | 1.6 | 1.4 | 57% | 21% | 1.71 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Hercílio Luz | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 21:10 | 29 |
|
2.13 | 29% | 3.1 | 6.5 | 50% | 29% | 2.21 |
2. | Caxias | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 19:16 | 23 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 2.9 | 5.1 | 79% | 57% | 2.50 |
3. | Camboriú | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 19:14 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 43% | 2.9 | 4.4 | 71% | 36% | 2.36 |
4. | Brasil de Pelotas | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:13 | 20 |
|
1.75 | 50% | 3.2 | 4.8 | 57% | 36% | 2.00 |
5. | Independiente FSJ | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 15:15 | 20 |
|
1.38 | 43% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 57% | 43% | 2.14 |
6. | Concórdia Atlético Clube | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 15:13 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 43% | 3.2 | 4.9 | 64% | 29% | 2.00 |
7. | Aimoré | 14 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 8:21 | 10 |
|
0.38 | 43% | 2.9 | 4.4 | 57% | 36% | 2.07 |
8. | Novo Hamburgo | 14 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 13:23 | 7 |
|
0.63 | 43% | 3.6 | 3.1 | 64% | 36% | 2.57 |