Kırmızı Kartlar
MATCH REPORT
Brezilya - Sao Paolo Youth Cup - 01/07/24 17:15 - 2.Tur
0-2 [97+7‘]
0-2 [97+7‘]
15‘ |
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
|
33‘ | |
35‘ |
0-1
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
|
45‘+3 | |
0-1 HT | ||
Unknown
|
46‘ | |
Unknown
|
53‘ | |
Unknown
|
54‘ | |
57‘ |
[0-2]
Unknown
(Penaltı)
|
|
Unknown
|
61‘ | |
64‘ |
Unknown
|
|
64‘ |
Unknown
|
|
64‘ |
Unknown
|
|
68‘ |
Unknown
|
|
73‘ |
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
|
78‘ | |
Unknown
|
79‘ | |
Unknown
|
83‘ | |
86‘ |
Unknown
|
|
0-2 FT |
Performans
KARTLAR 4 0
KARTLAR 3 0
Oynanan
Asistler | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Kartlar | 600 | 350 | -303 | ||
Kırmızı Kartlar | 600 | 400 | -333 |
Performans | |||
---|---|---|---|
Oran | 1 | 2 | Oran |
+1.25 | -109 | -127 | -1.25 |
+1.5 | -137 | 104 | -1.5 |
+1 | 126 | -182 | -1 |
Tekli mücadeleler | ||
---|---|---|
Oran | Bilgi | Ana Sayfa |
2.5 | 120 | -154 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Oran | Bilgi | Ana Sayfa |
10.5 | -118 | -105 |
10.0 | -118 | -105 |
Goller
Floresta CE U20
-
Wednesday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (Group Stage)
Floresta CE U20, Timon MA U20'ye karşı önemli bir Sao Paolo Youth Cup maçı oynuyor (Group Stage - 1/1)
Atletico-MG U20
-
Wednesday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (Group Stage)
Atletico-MG U20, SKA Brasil U20'ye karşı önemli bir Sao Paolo Youth Cup maçı oynuyor (Group Stage - 1/1)
Oynanan
Goller
Asistler
Kartlar
Kırmızı Kartlar
Takım Gücü
Karşılıklı
İY |
Şutlar |
Şutlar (kaleye) |
Tehlikeli atak |
Kornerler |
Kadro Değişiklikler |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Takım formu
Floresta CE U20 Last 6 Matches
İY |
Şutlar |
Şutlar (kaleye) |
Tehlikeli atak |
Kornerler |
Kadro Değişiklikler |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.1 |
SKA Brasil U20
|
1 - 2 |
Floresta CE U20
|
0-0 | 14 - 13 | 4 - 8 | 76 - 60 | 3 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-189 | 300 | 400 | |
18.8 |
Fortaleza U20
|
1 - 1 |
Floresta CE U20
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 42 - 28 | 4 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-278 | 350 | 550 | |
14.8 |
Pague Menos U20
|
1 - 0 |
Floresta CE U20
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 107 - 64 | 6 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
120 | 220 | 188 | ||
7.8 |
Floresta CE U20
|
1 - 0 |
Pague Menos U20
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
28.7 |
Floresta CE U20
|
2 - 3 |
Atlético Cearense U20
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 66 - 68 | 5 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-125 | 280 | 240 | |
21.7 |
Floresta CE U20
|
6 - 0 |
União Fortaleza U20
|
3-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Atletico-MG U20 Last 6 Matches
İY |
Şutlar |
Şutlar (kaleye) |
Tehlikeli atak |
Kornerler |
Kadro Değişiklikler |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.1 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
5 - 0 |
Timon MA U20
|
4-0 | 14 - 10 | 6 - 4 | 85 - 57 | 9 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-2000 | 1200 | 2800 | |
24.9 |
Cruzeiro U20
|
3 - 1 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
1-0 | 21 - 13 | 8 - 4 | 48 - 37 | 6 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
105 | 250 | 190 | |
17.9 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
3 - 1 |
Cruzeiro U20
|
1-0 | 21 - 17 | 6 - 4 | 37 - 33 | 6 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
130 | 240 | 160 | |
2.9 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
1 - 0 |
Boston City U20
|
0-0 | 23 - 9 | 9 - 1 | 45 - 25 | 10 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-189 | 320 | 350 | |
26.8 |
Boston City U20
|
0 - 0 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
0-0 | 12 - 14 | 6 - 5 | 65 - 66 | 5 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
275 | 320 | -154 | |
19.8 |
Três Corações U20
|
0 - 8 |
Atletico-MG U20
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
3300 | 1600 | -2500 |
Maçlar
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Tanabi SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
2. | Ponte Preta U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.0 | 4.0 | 25% | 25% | 1.67 |
3. | Vila Nova U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Atlético Gloriense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Corinthians U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Marília U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.3 | 33% | 17% | 1.67 |
3. | Bangu U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.7 | 7.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | JI-Parana RO U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.33 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Fortaleza U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:3 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 25% | 3.67 |
2. | CRB U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
3. | VOCEM U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | Castanhal U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 100% | 75% | 4.00 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | XV de Jaú U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Internacional U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 7.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
3. | Velo Clube U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | Santa Cruz SE U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Fluminense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 5.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Grêmio São-Carlense U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 2.7 | 7.7 | 17% | 17% | 1.00 |
3. | Lagarto U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 4.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
4. | São Raimundo RR U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:5 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Criciuma U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14:7 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 |
2. | Ituano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:8 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 4.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.67 |
3. | Itapirense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 33% | 33% | 3.67 |
4. | Atlético Cearense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Capital DF U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 4.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | América Mineiro U20 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Comercial de Tietê U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 100% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.67 |
4. | Ivinhema U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:4 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 3.0 | 2.7 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Desportivo Brasil U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 7.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Capivariano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Santa Cruz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Rio Branco AC U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Botafogo SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.00 |
2. | Sfera U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 17% | 17% | 2.33 |
3. | América RN U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Fast Clube U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group 18 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Atletico-MG U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
2. | Floresta CE U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | SKA Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 4.33 |
4. | Timon MA U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:14 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
Group 19 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Flamengo RJ U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.3 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
2. | São José PA U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
3. | Osasco Audax U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.7 | 2.3 | 33% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | São Bento U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Catanduva U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Atletico-PR U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
4. | Sparta U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:13 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.7 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.33 |
Group 20 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | XV de Piracicaba U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Nautico U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 4.7 | 100% | 25% | 3.00 |
3. | Trindade U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Sharjah Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.33 |
Group 21 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Bragantino U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:4 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 3.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
2. | AC Guaratinguetá U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 1.3 | 8.7 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
3. | Bahia U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:3 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 50% | 25% | 1.67 |
4. | Joinville U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 22 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Cuiabá U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Taubaté U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.3 | 3.7 | 17% | 17% | 1.67 |
3. | Inter Limeira U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | Patriotas U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 23 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Aster Brasil SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 7.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Sport Recife U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Santo André U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
4. | Cruzeiro AL U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 24 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Palmeiras U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 8.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
2. | Oeste U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.3 | 4.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.00 |
3. | União ABC U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
4. | Queimadense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:12 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 50% | 4.33 |
Group 25 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Juventude U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
2. | São Bernardo U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 3.7 | 8.0 | 17% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Portuguesa Santista U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 25% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Conquista U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 26 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Santos U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 9.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
2. | Água Santa U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 4.7 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Nova Venécia U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:11 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.00 |
4. | Remo U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 0.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group 27 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Portuguesa U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 8.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
2. | Madureira U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
3. | Goias U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 1.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
4. | União Suzano U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% | 4.00 |
Group 28 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Cruzeiro U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.3 | 50% | 25% | 4.00 |
2. | Nova Mutum U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 100% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 100% | 50% | 4.00 |
3. | Ricanato U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
4. | União Mogi U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:14 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 5.33 |
Group 29 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Vasco U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 5.7 | 75% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Macapá U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Flamengo SP U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
4. | Potyguar Seridoense U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Coimbra U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 7.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Mirassol U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 17% | 0% | 1.00 |
3. | ABC U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:8 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
4. | Sampaio Corrêa U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 30 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Ibrachina U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 4.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Vitoria U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1:0 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
3. | CSA U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
4. | Picos PI U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 31 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Coritiba U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 7.0 | 100% | 25% | 3.00 |
2. | Juventus U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Monte Azul U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
4. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 | |
4. | Canaã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 32 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Avaí U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.3 | 4.7 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Retrô U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
3. | Nacional SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:5 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | São Caetano U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 6.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Gremio U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 6.67 |
2. | Figueirense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:9 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 75% | 5.00 |
3. | Serra Branca U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.33 |
4. | Inter de Bebedouro U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 33% | 5.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Botafogo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 7.0 | 25% | 25% | 1.67 |
2. | Tiradentes PI U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
3. | Francana U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | Rio Claro SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Chapecoense-SC U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 100% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Novorizontino U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:3 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.67 |
3. | Jacuipense U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Comercial U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 2.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Ferroviária U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Sao Paulo U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.3 | 9.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
3. | Porto Vitória U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:10 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
4. | Carajás U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Ceará U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 5.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Gama U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.7 | 75% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | Rondoniense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:2 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 4.0 | 3.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
4. | EC Lemense U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Performans | O | G | B | M | Maçlar | Puan | Performans | Hücum | Savunma | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | Ort. G | ||
1. | Atlético GO U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Guarani U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 6.7 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Operário PR U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 1.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |