Zapowiedź
meczu
MATCH REPORT
USA - USL League Two - 07/21/23 22:00
1-2 [90‘]
1-2 [90‘]
21‘ |
0-1
Unknown
|
|
0-1 HT | ||
Unknown
[1-1]
|
58‘ | |
90‘ |
1-2
Unknown
|
|
90‘+2 |
Unknown
|
|
1-2 FT |
Statystyki
meczu
KARTKI 0 0
KARTKI 0 0
Kursy
Składy
Redlands
-
Redlands ma dobrą formę w ostatnich 5 meczach
Trener może być zadowolony z formy swojego zespołu (4W, 0D, 1L) w ostatnich 5 meczach.
-
Dobra forma w ostatnich 5 meczach u siebie dla Redlands
W ostatnich 5 meczach na Hodges Stadium rekord formy to (4W, 1D, 0L), co jest nagrodą dla fanów Redlands ze średnią frekwencją 0.
-
Niepokonana seria (6) na stadionie domowym
Redlands są niepokonani w ostatnich 6 meczach u siebie w USL League Two (4W, 2D). Zawodnicy strzelili 12 bramek i stracili 4 w tej serii.
SF Glens
-
Słaba forma w meczach wyjazdowych
3 przegrała 5 meczów. (2W, 0D, 3L) to rekord w meczach wyjazdowych. Ze średnią liczbą 1.2 straconych bramek na mecz.
Podsumowanie
H2H
H2H
(dom/wyjazd)
Forma
Forma
(dom/wyjazd)
Siła drużyny
Bezpośrednie starcia
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Forma drużyny
Redlands Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.7 |
Redlands
|
4 - 1 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
3-0 | 14 - 10 | 6 - 4 | 68 - 126 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
188 | 280 | -105 | |
12.7 |
Seahorses
|
0 - 1 |
Redlands
|
0-0 | 11 - 15 | 5 - 5 | 66 - 71 | 2 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
155 | 320 | 120 | |
8.7 |
Tucson
|
3 - 0 |
Redlands
|
3-0 | 14 - 4 | 7 - 1 | 48 - 21 | 7 - 2 |
0 (13%) 0 (0%) |
-133 | 280 | 280 | |
6.7 |
Arizona Arsenal
|
1 - 2 |
Redlands
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
24.6 |
Redlands
|
2 - 1 |
Capo
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (2%) |
- | - | - | |
21.6 |
Redlands
|
2 - 0 |
Seahorses
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-149 | 300 | 275 |
SF Glens Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.7 |
San Francisco City
|
1 - 0 |
SF Glens
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.7 |
SF Glens
|
2 - 0 |
Marin
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
2.7 |
Project 51O
|
0 - 1 |
SF Glens
|
0-0 | 10 - 9 | 1 - 2 | 58 - 45 | 9 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
140 | 333 | 115 | |
28.6 |
Marin
|
3 - 1 |
SF Glens
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.6 |
SF Glens
|
3 - 0 |
Monterey Bay II
|
1-0 | 9 - 5 | 4 - 0 | 29 - 42 | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
16.6 |
Davis Legacy
|
1 - 3 |
SF Glens
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Klasyfikacja
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 29:9 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.9 | 92% | 58% | 3.17 |
2. | RKC | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 35:20 | 25 |
|
1.63 | 75% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 4.58 |
3. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16:22 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 58% | 1.2 | 3.0 | 92% | 75% | 3.17 |
4. | WSA Winnipeg | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 21:14 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 82% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 90% | 63% | 3.18 |
5. | Rochester | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15:25 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 |
6. | Minneapolis City | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15:25 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 91% | 0.6 | 1.0 | 82% | 65% | 3.64 |
7. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 14:30 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 75% | 1.4 | 2.2 | 90% | 60% | 3.67 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 29:9 | 31 |
|
2.38 | 42% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | AFC Ann Arbor | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 23:13 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 55% | 1.0 | 3.3 | 80% | 63% | 3.27 |
3. | Oakland County | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20:22 | 16 |
|
1.63 | 67% | 1.0 | 1.9 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
4. | Lansing City | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 15:20 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 0.8 | 90% | 60% | 2.92 |
5. | Midwest United | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 20:17 | 12 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 72% | 63% | 3.36 |
6. | Kalamazoo FC | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 25:29 | 15 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 75% | 4.50 |
7. | South Bend Lions | 12 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8:30 | 4 |
|
0.25 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 90% | 58% | 3.17 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Chicago City | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 36:9 | 33 |
|
2.63 | 58% | 1.1 | 2.5 | 100% | 73% | 3.75 |
2. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 42:11 | 30 |
|
2.25 | 42% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 92% | 4.42 |
3. | Peoria | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27:17 | 18 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 100% | 67% | 3.67 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 23:31 | 18 |
|
1.13 | 67% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 92% | 83% | 4.50 |
5. | Wichita | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 22:28 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.9 | 92% | 75% | 4.17 |
6. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 12:35 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.7 | 90% | 72% | 3.92 |
7. | Springfield ASC | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 9:40 | 6 |
|
0.38 | 42% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 65% | 65% | 4.08 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 31:3 | 32 |
|
2.75 | 17% | 0.1 | 1.2 | 83% | 58% | 2.83 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 27:18 | 19 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 92% | 83% | 3.75 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 21:19 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 75% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
4. | Kings Hammer | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11:15 | 10 |
|
0.88 | 70% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.60 |
5. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9:23 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 45% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
6. | Buffalo | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11:32 | 6 |
|
0.50 | 55% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.91 |