Zapowiedź
meczu
MATCH REPORT
Brazylia - Sao Paolo Youth Cup - 01/11/24 11:00 - 3.Runda
4-0 [95+5‘]
4-0 [95+5‘]
Unknown
[1-0]
|
38‘ | |
Unknown
|
43‘ | |
1-0 HT | ||
Unknown
|
46‘ | |
Unknown
|
48‘ | |
52‘ |
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
[2-0]
|
56‘ | |
59‘ |
Unknown
|
|
(Rzut karny)
Unknown
[3-0]
|
60‘ | |
61‘ |
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
|
65‘ | |
66‘ |
Unknown
|
|
70‘ |
Unknown
|
|
79‘ |
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
|
88‘ | |
Unknown
|
90‘ | |
Unknown
[4-0]
|
90‘+4 | |
4-0 FT |
Statystyki
meczu
KARTKI 1 0
KARTKI 3 0
liczba podań
podań
Kursy
Mecz | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Kursy początkowe | -345 | 400 | 650 | ||
Kursy przed meczem |
-588 | 475 | 1200 |
Gole | ||
---|---|---|
Linia | Poniżej | Powyżej |
2.5 | 163 | -227 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Linia | Poniżej | Powyżej |
10.0 | -105 | -118 |
Składy
Macapá U20
-
Saturday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (2nd Round)
Macapá U20 gra przeciwko Ibrachina U20 ważny mecz Sao Paolo Youth Cup (2nd Round - 1/1)
Potyguar Seridoense U20
Podsumowanie
H2H
H2H
(dom/wyjazd)
Forma
Forma
(dom/wyjazd)
Siła drużyny
Bezpośrednie starcia
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Forma drużyny
Macapá U20 Last 2 Matches
Potyguar Seridoense U20 Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.1 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
0 - 2 |
Vasco U20
|
0-1 | 12 - 19 | 6 - 8 | 29 - 57 | 2 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
3300 | 1400 | -2000 | |
5.1 |
Flamengo SP U20
|
4 - 0 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
1-0 | 25 - 2 | 6 - 2 | 80 - 31 | 6 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-400 | 375 | 750 | |
29.9 |
América RN U20
|
2 - 2 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.9 |
ABC U20
|
0 - 1 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
17.9 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
1 - 1 |
ABC U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
10.9 |
Visão Celeste U20
|
1 - 6 |
Potyguar Seridoense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Klasyfikacja
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Tanabi SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
2. | Ponte Preta U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.0 | 4.0 | 25% | 25% | 1.67 |
3. | Vila Nova U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Atlético Gloriense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Corinthians U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Marília U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.3 | 33% | 17% | 1.67 |
3. | Bangu U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.7 | 7.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | JI-Parana RO U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.33 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Fortaleza U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:3 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 25% | 3.67 |
2. | CRB U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
3. | VOCEM U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | Castanhal U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 100% | 75% | 4.00 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | XV de Jaú U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Internacional U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 7.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
3. | Velo Clube U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | Santa Cruz SE U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Fluminense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 5.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Grêmio São-Carlense U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 2.7 | 7.7 | 17% | 17% | 1.00 |
3. | Lagarto U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 4.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
4. | São Raimundo RR U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:5 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Criciuma U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14:7 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 |
2. | Ituano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:8 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 4.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.67 |
3. | Itapirense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 33% | 33% | 3.67 |
4. | Atlético Cearense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Capital DF U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 4.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | América Mineiro U20 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Comercial de Tietê U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 100% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.67 |
4. | Ivinhema U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:4 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 3.0 | 2.7 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Desportivo Brasil U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 7.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Capivariano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Santa Cruz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Rio Branco AC U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Botafogo SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.00 |
2. | Sfera U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 17% | 17% | 2.33 |
3. | América RN U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | Fast Clube U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group 18 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Atletico-MG U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
2. | Floresta CE U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.3 | 7.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | SKA Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 4.33 |
4. | Timon MA U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:14 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
Group 19 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Flamengo RJ U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.3 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
2. | São José PA U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
3. | Osasco Audax U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.7 | 2.3 | 33% | 0% | 1.67 |
4. | São Bento U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Catanduva U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Atletico-PR U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
3. | Portuguesa RJ U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
4. | Sparta U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:13 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 0.7 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.33 |
Group 20 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | XV de Piracicaba U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
2. | Nautico U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 4.7 | 100% | 25% | 3.00 |
3. | Trindade U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Sharjah Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.33 |
Group 21 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Bragantino U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:4 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 3.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
2. | AC Guaratinguetá U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 1.3 | 8.7 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
3. | Bahia U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:3 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 50% | 25% | 1.67 |
4. | Joinville U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 22 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Cuiabá U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Taubaté U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 3.3 | 3.7 | 17% | 17% | 1.67 |
3. | Inter Limeira U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | Patriotas U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 23 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Aster Brasil SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 7.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Sport Recife U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 5.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Santo André U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
4. | Cruzeiro AL U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 24 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Palmeiras U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 8.0 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 |
2. | Oeste U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.3 | 4.3 | 50% | 50% | 4.00 |
3. | União ABC U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 2.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
4. | Queimadense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:12 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 50% | 4.33 |
Group 25 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Juventude U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
2. | São Bernardo U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 3.7 | 8.0 | 17% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Portuguesa Santista U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 25% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Conquista U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 26 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Santos U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 9.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
2. | Água Santa U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 4.7 | 5.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
3. | Nova Venécia U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:11 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.00 |
4. | Remo U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 0.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group 27 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Portuguesa U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 8.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
2. | Madureira U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
3. | Goias U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 1.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
4. | União Suzano U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% | 4.00 |
Group 28 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Cruzeiro U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 7.3 | 50% | 25% | 4.00 |
2. | Nova Mutum U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 100% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 100% | 50% | 4.00 |
3. | Ricanato U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
4. | União Mogi U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:14 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 5.7 | 50% | 50% | 5.33 |
Group 29 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Vasco U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 5.7 | 75% | 0% | 1.67 |
2. | Macapá U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6:2 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Flamengo SP U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
4. | Potyguar Seridoense U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Coimbra U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.7 | 7.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Mirassol U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 17% | 0% | 1.00 |
3. | ABC U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:8 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
4. | Sampaio Corrêa U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 30 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Ibrachina U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 4.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Vitoria U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1:0 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
3. | CSA U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
4. | Picos PI U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 31 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Coritiba U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 7.0 | 100% | 25% | 3.00 |
2. | Juventus U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Monte Azul U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
4. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 | |
4. | Canaã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 32 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Avaí U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.3 | 4.7 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Retrô U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
3. | Nacional SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:5 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 5.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | São Caetano U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 6.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Gremio U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 6.67 |
2. | Figueirense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:9 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 75% | 5.00 |
3. | Serra Branca U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.33 |
4. | Inter de Bebedouro U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 33% | 5.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Botafogo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 7.0 | 25% | 25% | 1.67 |
2. | Tiradentes PI U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
3. | Francana U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 5.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | Rio Claro SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Chapecoense-SC U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:3 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 100% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Novorizontino U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:3 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.67 |
3. | Jacuipense U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.3 | 1.7 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Comercial U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 2.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Ferroviária U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Sao Paulo U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.3 | 9.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
3. | Porto Vitória U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:10 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
4. | Carajás U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Ceará U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 5.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Gama U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.7 | 75% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | Rondoniense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:2 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 4.0 | 3.7 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
4. | EC Lemense U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Atlético GO U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
2. | Guarani U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.3 | 6.7 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Operário PR U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 1.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |