Zapowiedź
meczu
MATCH REPORT
Anglia - Non League Premier: Isthmian - 04/01/24 10:00 - 38.Runda
1-1 [90‘]
1-1 [90‘]
8‘ |
0-1
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
[1-1]
|
27‘ | |
1-1 HT | ||
1-1 FT |
Statystyki
meczu
KARTKI 0 0
KARTKI 0 0
Kursy
Mecz | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Kursy początkowe | 210 | 240 | 100 | ||
Kursy przed meczem |
225 | 250 | -110 |
Azjatycki handicap |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Linia | 1 | 2 | Linia |
+0.25 | -106 | -137 | -0.25 |
+0.75 | -189 | 127 | -0.75 |
+0 | 140 | -192 | -0 |
Gole | ||
---|---|---|
Linia | Poniżej | Powyżej |
2.5 | 110 | -143 |
Składy
Margate
-
Złe wyniki w ostatnich meczach dla Margate
Zła forma w ostatnich 5 meczach. Trudny okres dla zawodników i trenera J. Saunders, ponieważ rekord formy to (1W, 1D, 3L) przy średniej 2.2 straconych bramek na mecz.
-
Forma na stadionie domowym nie jest dobra
3 przegrała 5 meczów. (1W, 1D, 3L) to rekord na własnym boisku Hartsdown Park. Ze średnią liczbą 2.4 straconych bramek na mecz.
Cray Wanderers
-
Dobre wyniki w ostatnich meczach wyjazdowych dla Cray Wanderers
Mecze wyjazdowe zawsze są trudne, ale Cray Wanderers obecnie jest w dobrej formie w ostatnich 5 meczach wyjazdowych. Rekord formy to (3W, 1D, 1L)
-
Złe wyniki w ostatnich meczach dla Cray Wanderers
Zła forma w ostatnich 5 meczach. Trudny okres dla zawodników i trenera N. Smith, ponieważ rekord formy to (1W, 1D, 3L) przy średniej 1.4 straconych bramek na mecz.
Podsumowanie
H2H
H2H
(dom/wyjazd)
Forma
Forma
(dom/wyjazd)
Siła drużyny
Bezpośrednie starcia
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/26/23 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0-0 |
Margate
|
0-0 | 11 - 3 | 1- 2 | 67 - 48 | 5 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-125 | 240 | 280 | |
12/26/22 |
Margate
|
0-3 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
160 | 275 | 125 | |
08/29/22 |
Cray Wanderers
|
1-0 |
Margate
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
125 | 250 | 170 | |
12/27/21 |
Cray Wanderers
|
2-3 |
Margate
|
1-1 | 12 - 11 | 3- 6 | 30 - 36 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
140 | 260 | 138 | |
08/30/21 |
Margate
|
2-1 |
Cray Wanderers
|
1-1 | 8 - 7 | 6- 2 | 62 - 76 | 1 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (17%) |
170 | 240 | 120 | |
01/01/20 |
Margate
|
3-4 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0-1 | 7 - 15 | 5- 9 | 35 - 42 | 4 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Forma drużyny
Margate Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.3 |
Cheshunt
|
0 - 1 |
Margate
|
0-0 | 9 - 7 | 2 - 1 | 81 - 63 | 5 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-161 | 260 | 350 | |
23.3 |
Margate
|
1 - 1 |
Enfield Town
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
300 | 275 | -143 | |
16.3 |
Carshalton Athletic
|
3 - 0 |
Margate
|
1-0 | 14 - 7 | 5 - 2 | 64 - 35 | 9 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
9.3 |
Hashtag United
|
4 - 2 |
Margate
|
3-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 |
Margate
|
1 - 3 |
Horsham
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (5%) |
375 | 275 | -175 | |
24.2 |
Haringey Borough
|
1 - 0 |
Margate
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
125 | 240 | 170 |
Cray Wanderers Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.3 |
Cray Wanderers
|
2 - 2 |
Chatham Town
|
1-1 | 15 - 9 | 5 - 2 | 46 - 54 | 4 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
190 | 230 | 120 | |
24.3 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0 - 1 |
Folkestone Invicta
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (0%) |
130 | 275 | 160 | |
16.3 |
Haringey Borough
|
0 - 4 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0-1 | 3 - 13 | 2 - 7 | 52 - 86 | 3 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
13.3 |
Cray Wanderers
|
1 - 2 |
Potters Bar Town
|
0-1 | 6 - 7 | 3 - 4 | 54 - 64 | 5 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
27.2 |
Whitehawk
|
2 - 0 |
Cray Wanderers
|
0-0 | 8 - 12 | 3 - 1 | 56 - 69 | 4 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
145 | 260 | 130 | |
24.2 |
Cray Wanderers
|
1 - 0 |
Kingstonian
|
0-0 | 24 - 12 | 9 - 5 | 70 - 50 | 5 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-175 | 300 | 350 |
Klasyfikacja
Isthmian | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | AFC Hornchurch | 42 | 31 | 7 | 4 | 95:34 | 100 |
|
2.25 | 55% | 0.8 | 2.7 | 86% | 64% | 3.07 |
2. | Chatham Town | 42 | 24 | 7 | 11 | 87:61 | 79 |
|
1.50 | 71% | 0.9 | 1.9 | 93% | 74% | 3.52 |
3. | Enfield Town | 42 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 81:54 | 77 |
|
2.13 | 55% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 88% | 62% | 3.21 |
4. | Wingate & Finchley | 42 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 78:62 | 76 |
|
2.13 | 64% | 1.0 | 1.7 | 86% | 69% | 3.33 |
5. | Horsham | 42 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 64:50 | 76 |
|
1.88 | 64% | 0.6 | 2.5 | 83% | 52% | 2.71 |
6. | Billericay Town | 42 | 23 | 4 | 15 | 78:52 | 73 |
|
2.25 | 57% | 0.6 | 2.9 | 81% | 64% | 3.10 |
7. | Hastings United | 42 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 71:54 | 67 |
|
1.75 | 57% | 1.2 | 2.7 | 83% | 64% | 2.98 |
8. | Lewes | 42 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 68:70 | 67 |
|
2.00 | 62% | 1.0 | 2.6 | 93% | 74% | 3.29 |
9. | Whitehawk | 42 | 17 | 14 | 11 | 63:54 | 65 |
|
2.50 | 60% | 0.9 | 2.1 | 76% | 50% | 2.79 |
10. | Bognor Regis Town | 42 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 78:63 | 62 |
|
1.38 | 62% | 1.2 | 3.2 | 81% | 57% | 3.36 |
11. | Carshalton Athletic | 42 | 17 | 11 | 14 | 73:59 | 62 |
|
1.25 | 57% | 1.0 | 3.4 | 83% | 67% | 3.14 |
12. | Dulwich Hamlet | 42 | 17 | 11 | 14 | 77:72 | 62 |
|
1.25 | 76% | 0.9 | 2.8 | 98% | 74% | 3.55 |
13. | Hashtag United | 42 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 82:75 | 59 |
|
1.38 | 71% | 0.5 | 2.2 | 88% | 69% | 3.74 |
14. | Canvey Island | 42 | 16 | 6 | 20 | 62:74 | 54 |
|
1.75 | 64% | 0.6 | 1.6 | 88% | 69% | 3.24 |
15. | Potters Bar Town | 42 | 14 | 9 | 19 | 65:70 | 51 |
|
0.38 | 62% | 0.8 | 2.2 | 86% | 64% | 3.21 |
16. | Folkestone Invicta | 42 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 60:71 | 50 |
|
1.38 | 62% | 0.6 | 1.3 | 83% | 62% | 3.12 |
17. | Cray Wanderers | 42 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 54:66 | 50 |
|
0.63 | 52% | 1.3 | 2.7 | 76% | 52% | 2.86 |
18. | Cheshunt | 42 | 12 | 7 | 23 | 58:72 | 43 |
|
1.25 | 62% | 1.0 | 2.1 | 79% | 57% | 3.10 |
19. | Margate | 42 | 10 | 9 | 23 | 50:80 | 39 |
|
1.75 | 64% | 0.7 | 1.1 | 83% | 57% | 3.10 |
20. | Haringey Borough | 42 | 6 | 9 | 27 | 32:88 | 27 |
|
0.38 | 45% | 0.5 | 2.0 | 76% | 60% | 2.86 |
21. | Concord Rangers | 42 | 6 | 8 | 28 | 34:82 | 26 |
|
0.63 | 50% | 1.2 | 1.9 | 86% | 55% | 2.76 |
22. | Kingstonian | 42 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 55:102 | 21 |
|
0.00 | 74% | 1.0 | 2.8 | 90% | 83% | 3.74 |