Zapowiedź
meczu
MATCH REPORT
Anglia - Counties Leagues: Combined Counties Premier South - 02/18/23 10:00
2-3 [90‘]
2-3 [90‘]
HT | ||
2-3 FT |
Statystyki
meczu
KARTKI 0 0
KARTKI 0 0
Kursy
Składy
Colliers Wood United FC
-
Colliers Wood United FC ma dobrą formę w ostatnich 5 meczach
Trener może być zadowolony z formy swojego zespołu (4W, 0D, 1L) w ostatnich 5 meczach.
-
Niepokonana seria (4) dla Colliers Wood United FC
Colliers Wood United FC są niepokonani w ostatnich 4 Counties Leagues: Combined Counties Premier South meczach (4W, 0D). Zawodnicy strzelili 10 bramek i stracili 2 w tej serii.
-
Wednesday: Surrey Senior Cup (Quarter-finals)
Colliers Wood United FC gra przeciwko Virginia Water ważny mecz Surrey Senior Cup (Quarter-finals - 1/1)
Raynes Park Vale
-
Raynes Park Vale ma dobrą formę w ostatnich 5 meczach
Trener może być zadowolony z formy swojego zespołu (5W, 0D, 0L) w ostatnich 5 meczach.
-
Niepokonana seria (15) dla Raynes Park Vale
Raynes Park Vale są niepokonani w ostatnich 15 Counties Leagues: Combined Counties Premier South meczach (14W, 1D). Zawodnicy strzelili 36 bramek i stracili 8 w tej serii.
-
Dobre wyniki w ostatnich meczach wyjazdowych dla Raynes Park Vale
Mecze wyjazdowe zawsze są trudne, ale Raynes Park Vale obecnie jest w dobrej formie w ostatnich 5 meczach wyjazdowych. Rekord formy to (4W, 1D, 0L)
-
Niepokonana seria (11) w ostatnich meczach wyjazdowych
Raynes Park Vale są niepokonani w ostatnich 11 Counties Leagues: Combined Counties Premier South meczach wyjazdowych (9W, 2D). Zawodnicy strzelili 28 bramek i stracili 4 w tej serii.
-
Tuesday: Surrey Senior Cup (Quarter-finals)
Raynes Park Vale gra przeciwko Leatherhead ważny mecz Surrey Senior Cup (Quarter-finals - 1/1)
Podsumowanie
H2H
H2H
(dom/wyjazd)
Forma
Forma
(dom/wyjazd)
Siła drużyny
Bezpośrednie starcia
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/15/22 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
1-0 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11/12/22 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
0-1 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
03/22/22 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
1-1 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
03/09/22 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
0-2 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Forma drużyny
Colliers Wood United FC Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.2 |
Knaphill
|
0 - 1 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11.2 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
4 - 2 |
Guildford City
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.2 |
Sheerwater
|
0 - 1 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
1.2 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
1 - 0 |
Balham
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.1 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
4 - 0 |
Redhill
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
7.1 |
Colliers Wood United FC
|
1 - 4 |
Horley Town
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Raynes Park Vale Last 6 Matches
POŁ |
Strzały |
Strzały (na bramkę) |
Niebezpieczne ataki |
Rzuty rożne |
Skład Zmiany |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.2 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
2 - 0 |
Horley Town
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
11.2 |
Farnham Town
|
0 - 3 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
7.2 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
4 - 1 |
Kingstonian
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.2 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
2 - 1 |
Cobham
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
31.1 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
4 - 0 |
Knaphill
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
28.1 |
Camberley Town
|
0 - 4 |
Raynes Park Vale
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Klasyfikacja
Combined Counties Premier South | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Drużyna | MR | W | R | P | G | PKT | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | ŚR G | ||
1. | Raynes Park Vale | 38 | 32 | 3 | 3 | 100:29 | 99 |
|
3.00 | 48% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 73% | 3.39 |
2. | Badshot Lea | 38 | 30 | 4 | 4 | 105:29 | 94 |
|
2.63 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 86% | 3.53 |
3. | Jersey Bulls | 38 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 90:29 | 80 |
|
2.00 | 42% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 58% | 3.13 |
4. | Abbey Rangers | 38 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 88:51 | 69 |
|
1.13 | 63% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 88% | 73% | 3.66 |
5. | Farnham Town | 38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 82:54 | 65 |
|
2.25 | 69% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 85% | 73% | 3.58 |
6. | Colliers Wood United FC | 38 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 76:53 | 65 |
|
1.50 | 61% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 84% | 68% | 3.39 |
7. | Knaphill | 38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 62:40 | 65 |
|
1.75 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 69% | 52% | 2.68 |
8. | Tadley Calleva | 38 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 63:60 | 61 |
|
1.50 | 55% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 77% | 64% | 3.24 |
9. | Balham | 38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 63:59 | 53 |
|
1.75 | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75% | 64% | 3.21 |
10. | Camberley Town | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 61:61 | 52 |
|
1.88 | 61% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 91% | 82% | 3.21 |
11. | Cobham | 38 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 49:56 | 49 |
|
1.25 | 42% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 77% | 59% | 2.76 |
12. | Redhill | 38 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 59:89 | 49 |
|
0.88 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 91% | 73% | 3.89 |
13. | Alton | 38 | 12 | 9 | 17 | 57:71 | 45 |
|
2.00 | 65% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 88% | 69% | 3.37 |
14. | Guildford City | 38 | 12 | 6 | 20 | 56:74 | 42 |
|
1.38 | 68% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 87% | 83% | 3.42 |
15. | AFC Croydon Athletic | 38 | 12 | 4 | 22 | 55:78 | 40 |
|
0.50 | 61% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 76% | 3.50 |
16. | Sheerwater | 38 | 11 | 5 | 22 | 50:97 | 38 |
|
0.88 | 47% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 68% | 3.87 |
17. | Horley Town | 38 | 11 | 4 | 23 | 52:65 | 37 |
|
1.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 60% | 3.08 |
18. | Fleet Town | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 | 46:77 | 35 |
|
0.63 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 79% | 59% | 3.24 |
19. | Banstead Athletic | 38 | 9 | 4 | 25 | 38:74 | 31 |
|
0.88 | 58% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 78% | 69% | 2.95 |
20. | Frimley Green | 38 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 30:136 | 12 |
|
0.00 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92% | 83% | 4.37 |