Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Vietnam - V-League 2 - 07/17/20 05:00 - 8.Ronde
1-0 [90‘]
1-0 [90‘]
0-0 HT | ||
Anh Thi
[1-0]
|
84‘ | |
1-0 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 3 0
KAARTEN 1 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
Tay Ninh
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Tay Ninh
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (1W, 2G, 2V) is met hun gemiddelde van 1.2 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Bình Phước
-
Onverslagen reeks (3) voor Bình Phước
Bình Phước is ongeslagen in hun laatste 3 V-League 2 wedstrijden (3W, 0G). Spelers scoorden 3 doelpunten en 0 tegen in die reeks.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/08/19 |
Tay Ninh
|
0-1 |
Bình Phước
|
0-0 | 22 - 7 | 6- 3 | 54 - 28 | 5 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
05/26/19 |
Bình Phước
|
4-1 |
Tay Ninh
|
14 - 10 | 5- 4 | 52 - 32 | 2 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Tay Ninh Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.7 |
Tay Ninh
|
2 - 0 |
Can Tho
|
1-0 | 6 - 8 | 4 - 2 | 46 - 60 | 4 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
5.7 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
4 - 0 |
Tay Ninh
|
1-0 | 11 - 6 | 5 - 2 | 69 - 58 | 0 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-175 | 275 | 375 | |
1.7 |
Dak Lak
|
1 - 0 |
Tay Ninh
|
1-0 | 8 - 9 | 3 - 1 | 56 - 87 | 1 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.6 |
Tay Ninh
|
1 - 1 |
Pho Hien
|
0-1 | 10 - 9 | 2 - 2 | 62 - 52 | 2 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.6 |
Hue
|
0 - 0 |
Tay Ninh
|
0-0 | 10 - 3 | 1 - 0 | 69 - 41 | 9 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.6 |
Tay Ninh
|
3 - 1 |
Dong Thap
|
0-0 | 8 - 6 | 3 - 4 | 40 - 24 | 6 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Bình Phước Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.7 |
Bình Phước
|
1 - 0 |
Bà Ria Vũng Tàu
|
0-0 | 8 - 4 | 1 - 3 | 57 - 41 | 5 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
6.7 |
Bình Phước
|
1 - 0 |
Long An
|
1-0 | 5 - 8 | 3 - 1 | 25 - 65 | 2 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
1.7 |
An Giang
|
0 - 1 |
Bình Phước
|
0-0 | 9 - 5 | 2 - 3 | 37 - 21 | 3 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
25.6 |
Bình Phước
|
0 - 1 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
0-0 | 3 - 8 | 1 - 1 | 73 - 64 | 6 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
17.6 |
Dong Thap
|
2 - 2 |
Bình Phước
|
1-1 | 14 - 19 | 10 - 10 | 53 - 49 | 3 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.6 |
Bình Phước
|
0 - 1 |
Binh Dinh
|
0-0 | 13 - 14 | 4 - 5 | 40 - 63 | 3 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Bà Ria Vũng Tàu | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 17:7 | 24 |
|
2.38 | 36% | 1.5 | 5.2 | 47% | 37% | 2.18 |
2. | Sanna Khanh Hoa | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 17:8 | 20 |
|
1.38 | 36% | 1.3 | 3.9 | 62% | 33% | 2.27 |
3. | Binh Dinh | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 16:10 | 20 |
|
1.75 | 55% | 1.8 | 4.5 | 62% | 43% | 2.36 |
4. | Pho Hien | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 14:9 | 20 |
|
1.63 | 55% | 1.6 | 4.8 | 57% | 40% | 2.09 |
5. | Bình Phước | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 10:9 | 17 |
|
2.00 | 27% | 1.6 | 4.2 | 28% | 28% | 1.73 |
6. | An Giang | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 15:12 | 15 |
|
1.25 | 64% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 73% | 57% | 2.45 |
7. | Hue | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 13:14 | 15 |
|
1.63 | 64% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 62% | 62% | 2.45 |
8. | Tay Ninh | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 9:14 | 14 |
|
1.25 | 27% | 2.5 | 5.0 | 57% | 37% | 2.09 |
9. | Dak Lak | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8:13 | 10 |
|
1.13 | 36% | 2.1 | 4.1 | 57% | 38% | 1.91 |
10. | Can Tho | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 16:22 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 73% | 2.2 | 6.1 | 80% | 53% | 3.45 |
11. | Long An | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7:15 | 9 |
|
0.63 | 45% | 1.8 | 4.7 | 55% | 55% | 2.00 |
12. | Dong Thap | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 17:26 | 8 |
|
0.50 | 82% | 2.4 | 4.0 | 90% | 82% | 3.91 |