Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Brazilië - Sao Paolo Youth Cup - 01/06/23 15:15 - 2.Ronde
1-2 [90‘]
1-2 [90‘]
29‘ |
0-1
Unknown
|
|
Unknown
[1-1]
|
45‘+2 | |
1-1 HT | ||
(Gemiste strafschop)
Unknown
|
53‘ | |
72‘ |
1-2
Unknown
|
|
1-2 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 2 0
KAARTEN 2 0
ODDS
Wedstrijd | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X | 2 | |||
Openingsodds | 120 | 225 | 180 | ||
Pre-wedstrijdodds | 230 | 230 | -105 |
Aziatische handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lijn | 1 | 2 | Lijn |
+0 | 186 | -250 | -0 |
Doelpunten | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
2.5 | 100 | -125 |
Corners | ||
---|---|---|
Lijn | Onder | Over |
10.0 | -111 | -111 |
Opstellingen
Rio Preto U20
-
Monday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (Group Stage)
Rio Preto U20 speelt tegen Palmeiras U20 een belangrijke Sao Paolo Youth Cup wedstrijd (Group Stage - 1/1)
Juazeirense U20
-
Monday: Sao Paolo Youth Cup (Group Stage)
Juazeirense U20 speelt tegen América SP U20 een belangrijke Sao Paolo Youth Cup wedstrijd (Group Stage - 1/1)
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamvorm
Rio Preto U20 Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 |
Rio Preto U20
|
1 - 0 |
América SP U20
|
1-0 | 1 - 1 | 1 - 1 | 0 - 0 | 8 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-250 | 320 | 500 | |
31.8 |
RB Brasil U20
|
2 - 0 |
Rio Preto U20
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
23.8 |
Rio Preto U20
|
0 - 0 |
XV de Piracicaba U20
|
0-0 | 10 - 9 | 3 - 4 | 38 - 42 | 5 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
130 | 240 | 160 | |
16.8 |
Rio Preto U20
|
0 - 3 |
Ituano U20
|
0-1 | 8 - 12 | 2 - 6 | 62 - 81 | 6 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
188 | 240 | 115 | |
9.8 |
Ituano U20
|
2 - 0 |
Rio Preto U20
|
0-0 | 8 - 3 | 2 - 0 | 61 - 38 | 0 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
3.8 |
XV de Piracicaba U20
|
1 - 2 |
Rio Preto U20
|
0-1 | 10 - 12 | 3 - 4 | 81 - 76 | 2 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-137 | 275 | 275 |
Juazeirense U20 Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 |
Palmeiras U20
|
2 - 0 |
Juazeirense U20
|
2-0 | 12 - 10 | 6 - 4 | 77 - 43 | 7 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-1429 | 900 | 2500 | |
15.6 |
Bahia U20
|
3 - 0 |
Juazeirense U20
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
12.6 |
Juazeirense U20
|
1 - 0 |
Bahia U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.6 |
Jacuipense U20
|
0 - 1 |
Juazeirense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.5 |
Juazeirense U20
|
0 - 0 |
Jacuipense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
21.5 |
Bahia U20
|
0 - 0 |
Juazeirense U20
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Tanabi SP U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 4.7 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Real Ariquemes U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
3. | Portuguesa U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Nautico U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:6 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
Group 10 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Cruzeiro U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
2. | Capivariano U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 6.7 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
3. | Penapolense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | Comercial MS U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
Group 11 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sport Recife U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 0.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Comercial U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 2.3 | 3.7 | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
3. | Inter Limeira U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.3 | 100% | 25% | 2.67 |
4. | Volta Redonda U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 9.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group 12 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Corinthians U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 9.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
2. | Zumbi U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 2.3 | 6.7 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Ferroviária U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 7.3 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | Fast Clube U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
Group 13 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Goias U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
1. | Guaratinguetá U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2:1 | 3 |
|
3.00 | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
2. | AC Guaratinguetá U20 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2:2 | 2 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Pague Menos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.3 | 75% | 50% | 3.00 |
4. | Gama U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 0.0 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Group 14 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Fluminense U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 25% | 3.00 |
2. | Porto Vitória U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Imperatriz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:10 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
4. | Taubaté U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:6 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
Group 15 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Novorizontino U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 5.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | Vitória da Conquista U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
3. | Figueirense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
4. | União Suzano U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
Group 16 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Coritiba U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 5.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
2. | Flamengo SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 3.3 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | São José PA U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 6.0 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
4. | Guarulhos U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 17 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Sao Paulo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10:0 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 0% | 2.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
2. | CSP U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 5.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Marília U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:6 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.0 | 1.7 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
4. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 | |
4. | Porto Velho EC U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2:7 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
Group 18 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | América Mineiro U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 0.7 | 8.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.67 |
2. | Retrô U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.0 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
3. | Ponte Preta U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 6.7 | 25% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | VOCEM U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.7 | 33% | 33% | 3.33 |
Group 19 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Botafogo U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
2. | São Carlos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 5.7 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | Pinheirense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
4. | Grêmio São-Carlense U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 100% | 3.0 | 6.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Mirassol U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 1.0 | 5.3 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Chapecoense-SC U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 3.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | União ABC U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | Inter de Minas U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
Group 20 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Bragantino U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 100% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
2. | Maringá U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Lemense U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.67 |
3. | EC Lemense U20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | - | - | 50% | 17% | 0 |
4. | ABC U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
Group 21 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ituano U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Desportivo Brasil U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.7 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
3. | Camboriú U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
4. | CRB U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.0 | 3.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 22 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Rio Claro SP U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.3 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
2. | Sharjah Brasil U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Madureira U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Ceará U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 9.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
Group 23 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | SKA Brasil U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 4.0 | 50% | 17% | 2.33 |
2. | Aster Brasil U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 5.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
3. | JI-Parana RO U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Vitoria U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0:4 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 4.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 24 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Internacional U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
2. | Oeste U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2:0 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 0% | 1.3 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
3. | Rosário Central U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 2.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Fluminense PI U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
Group 25 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | São Bernardo U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 3.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.67 |
2. | Bahia U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1:0 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
3. | Operário PR U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:4 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 8.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.33 |
4. | CSA U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 1.3 | 9.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group 26 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Santo André U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 1.3 | 3.0 | 50% | 33% | 3.00 |
2. | Santos U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Falcon U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 25% | 2.33 |
4. | São Raimundo RR U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:9 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100% | 100% | 3.67 |
Group 27 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atletico-MG U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:3 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 8.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Água Santa U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:5 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 4.0 | 7.3 | 33% | 33% | 3.33 |
3. | Mixto U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 3.0 | 6.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
4. | Galvez U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
Group 28 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Vila Nova U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 3.0 | 4.3 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
2. | Nova Iguaçu U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 6.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
3. | Mauaense U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:5 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 100% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Mauá U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:4 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 75% | 0% | 1.67 |
Group 29 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Vasco U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:1 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.0 | 75% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Hercílio Luz U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 25% | 3.67 |
3. | Osasco Audax U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.0 | 3.7 | 17% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Ricanato U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 0.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.67 |
Group 3 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Palmeiras U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 67% | 3.3 | 8.3 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
2. | Juazeirense U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 1.7 | 100% | 75% | 3.33 |
3. | Rio Preto U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.7 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Santana U20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 0% | 0% | 0 |
4. | América SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 3.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 30 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Botafogo PB U20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6:2 | 9 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 2.67 |
2. | Ibrachina U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:1 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 0% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
3. | Santa Cruz U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 0% | 1.7 | 3.7 | 25% | 0% | 1.33 |
4. | Canaã U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:8 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 33% | 2.7 | 2.0 | 75% | 75% | 3.33 |
Group 31 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Remo U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 5.0 | 1.3 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
2. | Fortaleza U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 5.0 | 7.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | Juventus U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 3.7 | 6.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.67 |
4. | São Caetano U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1:3 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 3.3 | 5.3 | 50% | 0% | 1.33 |
Group 32 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | XV de Piracicaba U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 50% | 3.33 |
2. | Nacional SP U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
3. | Juventude U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6:5 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.3 | 100% | 75% | 3.67 |
4. | Alecrim U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:12 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 1.7 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
Group 4 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atlético GO U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.3 | 7.0 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
2. | Sampaio Corrêa U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
3. | Itabaiana U20 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7:7 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 75% | 4.67 |
4. | Botafogo SP U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6:8 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 100% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 100% | 100% | 4.67 |
Group 5 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Flamengo RJ U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.7 | 8.0 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
2. | Floresta CE U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2:2 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 0.7 | 4.7 | 25% | 25% | 1.33 |
3. | XV de Jaú U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.7 | 6.0 | 33% | 33% | 2.33 |
4. | Aparecidense U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:3 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 33% | 1.3 | 6.0 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
Group 6 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Ceilândia U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5:3 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.67 |
2. | Avaí U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 4.0 | 2.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.67 |
3. | Catanduva U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 33% | 1.7 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.33 |
4. | América RN U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5:6 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 100% | 1.7 | 2.7 | 100% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 7 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Atletico-PR U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:2 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 67% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 75% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Picos PI U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:7 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 5.7 | 75% | 75% | 4.33 |
3. | Barretos U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3:3 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 3.0 | 4.7 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | São Bento U20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4:7 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 67% | 3.0 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.67 |
Group 8 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Gremio U20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6:1 | 7 |
|
2.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 8.3 | 50% | 50% | 2.33 |
2. | Guarani U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 67% | 4.0 | 2.7 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 |
3. | Francana U20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:8 | 3 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 2.3 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% | 3.67 |
4. | Cruzeiro AL U20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1:2 | 2 |
|
0.67 | 33% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 25% | 25% | 1.00 |
Group 9 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Cuiabá U20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12:2 | 6 |
|
2.00 | 33% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 50% | 50% | 4.67 |
2. | Parauapebas U20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 5 |
|
1.67 | 33% | 1.3 | 2.0 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
3. | Velo Clube U20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 4 |
|
1.33 | 100% | 2.7 | 4.3 | 100% | 75% | 2.67 |
4. | Tupã U20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:12 | 1 |
|
0.33 | 33% | 2.0 | 1.3 | 33% | 33% | 4.33 |