Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Duitsland - Oberliga: Hessen - 10/11/20 09:00 - 9.Ronde
1-1 [90‘]
1-1 [90‘]
1-0 HT | ||
1-1 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 2 0
KAARTEN 2 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
SV Zeilsheim
Neuhof
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Neuhof
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (1W, 0G, 4V) is met hun gemiddelde van 3 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamvorm
SV Zeilsheim Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.10 |
SV Steinbach
|
0 - 1 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
0-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
110 | 300 | 160 | |
3.10 |
Hunfelder SV
|
1 - 0 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
27.9 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
3 - 3 |
Hanau 93
|
2-0 | 20 - 20 | 6 - 12 | 38 - 44 | 2 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
23.9 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
1 - 3 |
Waldgirmes
|
1-2 | 6 - 9 | 3 - 4 | 83 - 64 | 4 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
19.9 |
FC 1906 Erlensee
|
0 - 6 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
0-3 | 17 - 17 | 4 - 11 | 54 - 49 | 9 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
16.9 |
Eddersheim
|
2 - 1 |
SV Zeilsheim
|
1-0 | 8 - 11 | 7 - 5 | 101 - 92 | 7 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Neuhof Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.10 |
FC 1906 Erlensee
|
2 - 0 |
Neuhof
|
1-0 | 6 - 1 | 3 - 1 | 33 - 41 | 5 - 2 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
4.10 |
Neuhof
|
0 - 3 |
Rot-Weiß Hadamar
|
0-0 | 4 - 8 | 2 - 4 | 60 - 79 | 1 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
27.9 |
Fernwald
|
2 - 4 |
Neuhof
|
2-2 | 6 - 13 | 3 - 9 | 57 - 91 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
23.9 |
Neuhof
|
3 - 4 |
Baunatal
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.9 |
Neuhof
|
0 - 4 |
Türk Gücü Friedberg
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
16.9 |
Hunfelder SV
|
0 - 1 |
Neuhof
|
0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Standen
Hessen | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Barockstadt Fulda-Lehnerz | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 31:6 | 33 |
|
3.00 | 33% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.08 |
2. | Hessen Dreieich | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 37:11 | 31 |
|
2.38 | 58% | 1.1 | 2.3 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
3. | Rot-Weiß Walldorf | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 31:17 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 75% | 1.7 | 6.1 | 75% | 58% | 4.00 |
4. | Hanau 93 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 28:14 | 23 |
|
2.00 | 55% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 92% | 83% | 3.82 |
5. | Türk Gücü Friedberg | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 24:9 | 22 |
|
1.63 | 27% | 1.7 | 4.2 | 72% | 53% | 3.00 |
6. | Rot-Weiß Hadamar | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 15:15 | 19 |
|
1.25 | 33% | 1.6 | 5.8 | 75% | 42% | 2.50 |
7. | Waldgirmes | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 24:21 | 18 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 100% | 67% | 3.75 |
8. | Buchonia Flieden | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20:17 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 58% | 1.7 | 1.9 | 100% | 67% | 3.08 |
9. | SV Zeilsheim | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 23:22 | 15 |
|
1.38 | 67% | 1.6 | 2.8 | 75% | 67% | 3.75 |
11. | SV Steinbach | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 15:17 | 15 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 83% | 33% | 2.67 |
12. | FV Bad Vilbel | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12:14 | 13 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 2.0 | 3.8 | 67% | 25% | 2.17 |
13. | Baunatal | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 14:19 | 13 |
|
1.50 | 82% | 2.8 | 6.5 | 83% | 57% | 3.00 |
14. | Neuhof | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 12:25 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 25% | 1.3 | 1.8 | 75% | 50% | 3.08 |
15. | Dietkirchen | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 16:34 | 13 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 1.4 | 2.5 | 100% | 83% | 4.17 |
16. | Ginsheim | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 17:25 | 11 |
|
0.88 | 50% | 1.8 | 4.0 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
17. | Viktoria Griesheim | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12:16 | 10 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 1.4 | 3.4 | 83% | 42% | 2.33 |
18. | Hunfelder SV | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8:23 | 9 |
|
0.88 | 33% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 75% | 42% | 2.58 |
19. | Eddersheim | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 19:28 | 8 |
|
0.63 | 73% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 100% | 63% | 4.27 |
20. | FC 1906 Erlensee | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7:30 | 7 |
|
0.88 | 36% | 1.5 | 2.1 | 83% | 47% | 3.36 |