Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Duitsland - Oberliga: Hamburg - 02/05/22 08:00 - 18.Ronde
0-0 [90‘]
0-0 [90‘]
0-0 HT | ||
0-0 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 0 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
Opstellingen
Lohbrugge
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Lohbrugge
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (2W, 0G, 3V) is met hun gemiddelde van 2.4 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
TSV Sasel
-
Onverslagen reeks (4) voor TSV Sasel
TSV Sasel is ongeslagen in hun laatste 4 Oberliga: Hamburg wedstrijden (3W, 1G). Spelers scoorden 10 doelpunten en 6 tegen in die reeks.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/17/21 |
TSV Sasel
|
6-1 |
Lohbrugge
|
4-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-455 | 500 | 850 |
Teamvorm
Lohbrugge Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.1 |
Meiendorfer SV
|
0 - 2 |
Lohbrugge
|
0-1 | 1 - 9 | 0 - 3 | 105 - 104 | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
240 | 320 | -143 | |
25.1 |
Lohbrugge
|
1 - 6 |
Bramfelder SV
|
0-2 | 3 - 12 | 1 - 8 | 60 - 52 | 5 - 7 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-149 | 333 | 240 | |
4.12 |
Curslack-Neuengamme
|
4 - 1 |
Lohbrugge
|
2-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-345 | 425 | 600 | |
19.11 |
Barmbek-Uhlenhorst
|
2 - 1 |
Lohbrugge
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-133 | 320 | 240 | ||
7.11 |
Zonguldakspor
|
1 - 2 |
Lohbrugge
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.10 |
Bramfelder SV
|
0 - 1 |
Lohbrugge
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
163 | 300 | 110 |
TSV Sasel Last 6 Matches
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.1 |
TSV Sasel
|
1 - 0 |
Dassendorf
|
1-0 | 7 - 5 | 1 - 2 | 44 - 74 | 2 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
450 | 375 | -227 | |
23.1 |
TSV Sasel
|
3 - 1 |
Meiendorfer SV
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-3333 | 1200 | 3300 | |
15.1 |
TSV Sasel
|
2 - 0 |
Altona 93
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 11 (68%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.12 |
Paloma
|
3 - 3 |
TSV Sasel
|
2-2 | 11 - 14 | 8 - 9 | 52 - 52 | 4 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
180 | 300 | -105 | |
28.11 |
TSV Sasel
|
3 - 2 |
Curslack-Neuengamme
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-120 | 300 | 210 | |
19.11 |
Hamm United
|
3 - 2 |
TSV Sasel
|
2-1 | 11 - 8 | 7 - 4 | 56 - 78 | 1 - 3 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
600 | 450 | -345 |
Standen
Hamburg | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Dassendorf | 18 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 63:12 | 49 |
|
2.63 | 50% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 89% | 72% | 4.17 |
2. | TSV Sasel | 18 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 51:26 | 39 |
|
2.13 | 72% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 89% | 83% | 4.28 |
3. | Wandsbeker TSV Concordia | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 28:16 | 24 |
|
1.50 | 36% | 0.9 | 2.7 | 79% | 71% | 3.14 |
3. | Concordia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 0% | - | - | 83% | 77% | 0 |
4. | Paloma | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 34:27 | 33 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.9 | 2.1 | 89% | 53% | 3.39 |
5. | Curslack-Neuengamme | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 50:30 | 30 |
|
1.75 | 78% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 83% | 78% | 4.44 |
6. | Lohbrugge | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 22:34 | 20 |
|
1.25 | 44% | 0.4 | 1.2 | 67% | 50% | 3.11 |
7. | Barmbek-Uhlenhorst | 18 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 31:53 | 17 |
|
1.00 | 56% | 0.9 | 2.3 | 94% | 78% | 4.67 |
8. | Hamm United | 18 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 19:44 | 16 |
|
0.88 | 44% | 1.5 | 1.8 | 78% | 67% | 3.50 |
9. | Bramfelder SV | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 29:48 | 12 |
|
1.00 | 81% | 1.3 | 2.2 | 88% | 75% | 4.28 |
10. | Meiendorfer SV | 18 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 15:58 | 8 |
|
0.13 | 56% | 0.4 | 1.0 | 82% | 65% | 4.06 |
Group 2 | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
1. | Niendorfer TSV | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 43:25 | 35 |
|
2.63 | 81% | 0.9 | 2.2 | 87% | 73% | 4.25 |
2. | Victoria Hamburg | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 34:24 | 26 |
|
1.75 | 75% | 1.1 | 3.3 | 100% | 87% | 3.63 |
3. | HEBC | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 40:35 | 26 |
|
1.50 | 94% | 0.6 | 1.8 | 94% | 87% | 4.69 |
4. | Buchholz | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 34:31 | 24 |
|
1.00 | 81% | 0.7 | 1.5 | 94% | 75% | 4.06 |
5. | Osdorf | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 37:31 | 23 |
|
0.88 | 81% | 1.1 | 2.4 | 94% | 88% | 4.25 |
6. | Süderelbe | 16 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 32:39 | 20 |
|
1.38 | 81% | 1.0 | 1.5 | 94% | 73% | 4.44 |
7. | Hamburger SV III | 16 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 37:52 | 17 |
|
0.88 | 81% | 1.3 | 3.6 | 100% | 87% | 5.56 |
8. | Rugenbergen | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 20:29 | 16 |
|
1.38 | 56% | 0.6 | 1.1 | 88% | 56% | 3.06 |
9. | Union Tornesch | 16 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 32:43 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 81% | 0.8 | 1.5 | 100% | 94% | 4.69 |