Champions League
Europa League
Premier League
La Liga
Bundesliga
Serie A
Ligue 1
Eredivisie
Primeira Liga
Super Lig
Premier League
Serie A
Major League Soccer
Liga MX
Premiership
Championship
League One
League Two
La Liga 2
2. Bundesliga
Serie B
Ligue 2
Eerste Divisie
Pro League
Super League
Tipico Bundesliga
Superliga
Eliteserien
Allsvenskan
A-League
Super League
J-League
K League 2
Premier League
Indian Super League
UEFA Nations League
FA Cup
Carabao Cup
Copa Del Rey
Wedstrijdvoorbeschouwing
MATCH REPORT
Duitsland - Oberliga: Rheinland-Pfalz/Saar - 10/23/21 09:30 - 13.Ronde
2-3 [90‘]
2-3 [90‘]
| 1-1 HT | ||
| 2-3 FT |
Wedstrijdstatistieken
KAARTEN 0 0
KAARTEN 0 0
ODDS
| Wedstrijd | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | X | 2 | |||
| Openingsodds | -120 | 300 | 210 | ||
| Pre-wedstrijdodds | -120 | 300 | 210 | ||
| Doelpunten | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lijn | Onder | Over |
| 2.5 | 160 | -208 |
Opstellingen
Hassia Bingen
-
De vorm in het thuisstadion is niet goed
3 verliezen in 5 wedstrijden. (1W, 1G, 3V) is het record op thuisgrond Stadion am Hessenhaus. Met hun gemiddelde van 2 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Eisbachtal
-
Slechte resultaten in laatste wedstrijden voor Eisbachtal
Slechte vorm binnen de laatste 5 wedstrijden. Moeilijke periode voor de spelers en coach omdat het vormrecord (1W, 2G, 2V) is met hun gemiddelde van 2 doelpunten tegen per wedstrijd.
Samenvatting
H2H
H2H (THUIS/UIT)
VORM
VORM (THUIS/UIT)
Teamsterkte
Head to head
50%
|
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/21 |
|
Eisbachtal
|
1-1 |
Hassia Bingen
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
| 10/24/20 |
|
Eisbachtal
|
1-3 |
Hassia Bingen
|
7 - 8 | 2- 4 | 58 - 40 | 8 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
| 08/23/19 |
|
Hassia Bingen
|
1-2 |
Eisbachtal
|
1-1 | 18 - 11 | 4- 4 | 110 - 64 | 8 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Teamvorm
Hassia Bingen Last 6 Matches
|
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.10 |
|
Kaiserslautern II
|
0 - 3 |
Hassia Bingen
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-120 | 320 | 220 |
| 9.10 |
|
Hassia Bingen
|
1 - 2 |
Eintracht Trier
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
800 | 550 | -556 |
| 6.10 | 
|
Hassia Bingen
|
3 - 3 |
Alemannia Waldalgesheim
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
| 3.10 |
|
Alemannia Waldalgesheim
|
2 - 0 |
Hassia Bingen
|
2-0 | 5 - 1 | 5 - 1 | 47 - 37 | 5 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
125 | 275 | 150 |
| 25.9 |
|
Hassia Bingen
|
2 - 0 |
Emmelshausen
|
1-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-333 | 400 | 600 |
| 22.9 |
|
Mülheim-Kärlich
|
0 - 0 |
Hassia Bingen
|
0-0 | 11 - 11 | 3 - 3 | 30 - 37 | 3 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
188 | 300 | -110 |
Eisbachtal Last 6 Matches
|
RT |
Schoten |
Schoten (op doel) |
Gevaarlijke aanval |
Hoeken |
Opstelling Wijzigingen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.10 |
|
Eisbachtal
|
4 - 4 |
Eintracht Trier
|
2-3 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
900 | 700 | -769 |
| 9.10 |
|
Eisbachtal
|
3 - 1 |
Alemannia Waldalgesheim
|
1-0 | 15 - 14 | 4 - 7 | 46 - 35 | 8 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
333 | 375 | -189 |
| 1.10 |
|
Emmelshausen
|
2 - 0 |
Eisbachtal
|
1-0 | 12 - 14 | 4 - 3 | 40 - 66 | 4 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
260 | 320 | -143 |
| 29.9 | 
|
Wirges
|
1 - 1 |
Eisbachtal
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
| 25.9 |
|
Eisbachtal
|
1 - 1 |
Mülheim-Kärlich
|
0-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-133 | 320 | 220 |
| 22.9 |
|
FV Engers 07
|
2 - 1 |
Eisbachtal
|
1-0 | 9 - 13 | 3 - 4 | 36 - 54 | 0 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-182 | 320 | 333 |
Standen
| Rheinland-Pfalz / Saar | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nord | |||||||||||||||
| # | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
| 1. |
Eintracht Trier
|
22 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 58:19 | 49 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.4 | 2.2 | 85% | 65% | 3.50 |
| 2. |
Alemannia Waldalgesheim
|
22 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 43:32 | 39 |
|
2.00 | 64% | 0.6 | 1.1 | 91% | 73% | 3.41 |
| 3. |
Gonsenheim
|
22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 41:27 | 38 |
|
2.13 | 52% | 0.9 | 2.0 | 75% | 57% | 3.09 |
| 4. |
FV Engers 07
|
22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 34:27 | 38 |
|
2.13 | 65% | 1.0 | 1.9 | 95% | 70% | 2.77 |
| 5. |
Karbach
|
22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 45:30 | 37 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 95% | 75% | 3.41 |
| 6. |
Koblenz
|
22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 33:32 | 29 |
|
1.13 | 64% | 1.0 | 3.9 | 86% | 55% | 2.95 |
| 7. |
Kaiserslautern II
|
22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 34:42 | 29 |
|
1.63 | 68% | 0.9 | 2.5 | 82% | 77% | 3.45 |
| 8. |
Mülheim-Kärlich
|
22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 27:34 | 27 |
|
1.75 | 65% | 0.8 | 1.2 | 90% | 55% | 2.77 |
| 9. |
Eisbachtal
|
22 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 39:44 | 23 |
|
0.63 | 75% | 0.7 | 1.6 | 90% | 75% | 3.77 |
| 10. |
Salmrohr
|
22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 30:56 | 23 |
|
1.38 | 68% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 91% | 81% | 3.91 |
| 11. |
Hassia Bingen
|
22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 27:42 | 19 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 1.2 | 2.4 | 86% | 64% | 3.14 |
| 12. |
Emmelshausen
|
22 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 19:45 | 18 |
|
0.75 | 35% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 90% | 50% | 2.91 |
| Süd | |||||||||||||||
| # | Team | GW | W | G | V | D | Ptn | Vorm | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | GEM D | ||
| 1. |
Wormatia Worms
|
22 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 60:18 | 50 |
|
1.88 | 55% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 91% | 64% | 3.55 |
| 2. |
Hertha Wiesbach
|
22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 62:37 | 46 |
|
2.38 | 82% | 0.1 | 0.9 | 91% | 86% | 4.50 |
| 3. |
Arminia Ludwigshafen
|
22 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 59:39 | 46 |
|
2.25 | 82% | 0.8 | 2.5 | 91% | 86% | 4.45 |
| 4. |
Diefflen
|
22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 47:42 | 37 |
|
2.00 | 75% | 0.2 | 1.7 | 95% | 85% | 4.05 |
| 5. |
Dudenhofen
|
22 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 57:35 | 36 |
|
1.25 | 68% | 1.5 | 3.2 | 91% | 77% | 4.18 |
| 6. |
Mechtersheim
|
22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 45:41 | 33 |
|
1.75 | 70% | 0.6 | 1.5 | 100% | 80% | 3.91 |
| 7. |
Pfeddersheim
|
22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 39:39 | 30 |
|
1.38 | 45% | 0.7 | 1.3 | 82% | 45% | 3.55 |
| 8. |
Röchling Völklingen
|
22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 29:43 | 24 |
|
0.88 | 64% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 86% | 73% | 3.27 |
| 9. |
Elversberg II
|
22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 33:54 | 23 |
|
0.88 | 80% | 0.2 | 2.1 | 91% | 91% | 3.95 |
| 10. |
Eppelborn
|
22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 32:56 | 21 |
|
1.00 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 91% | 77% | 4.00 |
| 11. |
Jagersburg
|
22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 33:50 | 19 |
|
0.88 | 65% | 0.0 | 0.5 | 95% | 90% | 3.77 |
| 12. |
Speyer
|
22 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 29:71 | 7 |
|
0.00 | 65% | 1.0 | 2.1 | 90% | 85% | 4.55 |