Anteprima partita
MATCH REPORT
Asia - AFC Champions League - 01/14/20 06:30
3-2 [90‘]
3-2 [90‘]
(Minegishi)
Lopez
[1-0]
|
5‘ | |
Lopez
|
10‘ | |
28‘ |
Zaw Hein Thi
|
|
37‘ |
Nii Armah Tagoe
|
|
(Porteria)
Marañón
[2-0]
|
40‘ | |
2-0 HT | ||
57‘ |
Phyo Win
Htan
|
|
73‘ |
2-1
Min Tun
(Phyo Win)
|
|
78‘ |
Abubakar
|
|
(Ott)
Porteria
[3-1]
|
79‘ | |
Ott
Mallen Christiaens
|
80‘ | |
80‘ |
Aung Pyae Ko
|
|
Schröck
|
82‘ | |
84‘ |
Phyo Win
|
|
Mallen Christiaens
|
84‘ | |
87‘ |
3-2
Maximin Djawa
(Nah)
|
|
Villanueva
|
89‘ | |
Lopez
Younghusband
|
90‘+4 | |
3-2 FT |
Statistiche della partita
CARTELLINI 4 0
CARTELLINI 4 0
QUOTE
Formazioni
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Ceres Philippines
Estado: Alineación confirmada
Shan United
Formazioni
Statistiche:
PANCHINA
Ceres Philippines
Shan United
-
L'allenatore ha tutta la rosa disponibile
Il personale medico e l'allenatore A. U possono essere davvero felici per avere tutta la rosa disponibile.
Sommario
H2H
H2H (CASA/TRASFERTA)
FORMA
FORMA (CASA/TRASFERTA)
Forza della squadra
Testa a testa
ÏNT |
Tiri |
Tiri (in porta) |
Attacco pericoloso |
Calci d'angolo |
Formazione Cambiamenti |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/14/18 |
Shan United
|
0-1 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0-1 | 6 - 14 | 4- 5 | 41 - 53 | 4 - 7 |
4 (57%) 3 (63%) |
- | - | - | |
03/06/18 |
Ceres Philippines
|
2-0 |
Shan United
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (58%) 1 (82%) |
- | - | - | |
01/16/18 |
Shan United
|
1-1 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0-0 | 6 - | 3- 3 | 49 - 97 | 1 - 5 |
0 (0%) 11 (42%) |
333 | 260 | -143 |
Forma della squadra
Ceres Philippines Last 6 Matches
ÏNT |
Tiri |
Tiri (in porta) |
Attacco pericoloso |
Calci d'angolo |
Formazione Cambiamenti |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.2 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 2 |
Yangon United
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.8 |
Home United
|
2 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0-0 | 11 - 10 | 5 - 2 | 53 - 89 | 4 - 8 |
0 (63%) 0 (34%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 1 |
Home United
|
1-1 | 18 - 5 | 6 - 3 | 98 - 44 | 6 - 4 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
16.5 |
Yangon United
|
3 - 2 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-1 | 13 - 8 | 4 - 7 | 75 - 55 | 6 - 0 |
2 (71%) 2 (49%) |
- | - | - | |
9.5 |
Ceres Philippines
|
4 - 2 |
Yangon United
|
3-0 | 19 - 8 | 10 - 4 | 76 - 46 | 5 - 2 |
0 (46%) 1 (76%) |
- | - | - | |
25.4 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0 - 2 |
Home United
|
0-0 | 19 - 8 | 5 - 3 | 79 - 32 | 7 - 2 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Shan United Last 6 Matches
ÏNT |
Tiri |
Tiri (in porta) |
Attacco pericoloso |
Calci d'angolo |
Formazione Cambiamenti |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.1 |
I.S.P.E
|
0 - 1 |
Shan United
|
4 - 21 | 2 - 12 | 20 - 103 | 0 - 12 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.9 |
Shan United
|
4 - 1 |
Rakhine United
|
0-0 | 17 - 12 | 7 - 4 | 82 - 33 | 14 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
18.8 |
Shan United
|
2 - 0 |
Magwe
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
11.8 |
Shan United
|
2 - 1 |
Zwekapin United
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
4.8 |
Shan United
|
3 - 2 |
Yadanarbon
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
27.7 |
Shan United
|
1 - 1 |
Southern Myanmar
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Classifiche
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Al Ahli | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4:6 | 6 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.50 |
2. | Esteghlal | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 100% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Shorta | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 75% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Wahda | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 50% | - | - | 50% | 0% | 0 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.0 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
2. | Al Hilal | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6:2 | 11 |
|
2.20 | 40% | 0.6 | 5.4 | 67% | 42% | 1.60 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4:4 | 7 |
|
1.40 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 42% | 42% | 1.60 |
4. | Padideh Khorasan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0:8 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 33% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.17 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Taawoun | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.5 | 83% | 83% | 4.00 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 83% | 33% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 3.67 |
3. | Sepahan | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 83% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Ain | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12:4 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Melbourne Victory | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 2.5 | 4.0 | 67% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Seoul | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 83% | 83% | 3.17 |
4. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 100% | 67% | 3.17 |
2. | Tokyo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
3. | Shanghai Shenhua | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 83% | 83% | 3.67 |
4. | Perth Glory | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5:11 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Vissel Kobe | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9:6 | 9 |
|
1.80 | 100% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 75% | 42% | 3.00 |
2. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Suwon Bluewings | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 50% | 17% | 1.60 |
4. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
1.50 | 100% | 3.5 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Squadra | PG | V | P | L | G | Pts | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | MEDIA G | ||
1. | Yokohama F. Marinos | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
2. | Shanghai Port | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.7 | 0.2 | 83% | 67% | 2.67 |
3. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
4. | Sydney | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |