Pregled utakmice
MATCH REPORT
Njemačka - State Leagues: Württemberg - 05/20/23 09:30 - 31.Kolo
0-3 [90‘]
0-3 [90‘]
HT | ||
0-3 FT |
Statistike utakmice
KARTONI 0 0
KARTONI 0 0
KVOTE
Sastavi
Nagold
-
Loši rezultati u posljednjim utakmicama za Nagold
Loša forma u posljednjih 5 utakmica. Nije lako razdoblje za igrače i trenera jer je forma (1P, 1R, 3I) s prosjekom od 3 primljenih golova po utakmici.
Sindelfingen
-
Neporaženi niz (3) za Sindelfingen
Sindelfingen su neporaženi u posljednjih 3 State Leagues: Württemberg utakmice (2P, 1R). Igrači su postigli 7 golova i primili 2 u tom nizu.
-
Slaba forma u gostujućim utakmicama
3 poraza u 5 utakmica. (0P, 2R, 3I) je forma u gostujućim utakmicama. S prosjekom od 2.6 primljenih golova po utakmici.
Sažetak
H2H
H2H (DOMA/GOST)
FORMA
FORMA (DOMA/GOST)
Snaga tima
Usporedba
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/29/22 |
Sindelfingen
|
1-4 |
Nagold
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Forma tima
Nagold Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.5 |
TSV Essingen
|
1 - 1 |
Nagold
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
6.5 |
Nagold
|
2 - 3 |
Spfr. Dorfmerkingen
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.4 |
TSG Tübingen
|
5 - 2 |
Nagold
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
23.4 |
Nagold
|
4 - 3 |
Hofherrnweiler-Unterromb
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.4 |
Rutesheim
|
3 - 1 |
Nagold
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
6.4 |
Nagold
|
1 - 0 |
Pfullingen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Sindelfingen Last 6 Matches
PO |
Udarci |
Udarci (u gol) |
Opasni napad |
Korneri |
Postava Promjene |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.5 |
Sindelfingen
|
4 - 1 |
Spfr. Dorfmerkingen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
6.5 |
Hofherrnweiler-Unterromb
|
0 - 0 |
Sindelfingen
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
29.4 |
Sindelfingen
|
3 - 1 |
Pfullingen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
22.4 |
Normannia Gmund
|
3 - 0 |
Sindelfingen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
15.4 |
Sindelfingen
|
3 - 0 |
Wangen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
8.4 |
Berg
|
5 - 2 |
Sindelfingen
|
0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Poredak
Württemberg | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Tim | UTA | P | R | P | G | Bod | Forma | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | PROS G | ||
1. | TSV Essingen | 34 | 25 | 4 | 5 | 73:30 | 79 |
|
2.00 | 53% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 78% | 73% | 3.03 |
2. | Normannia Gmund | 34 | 23 | 4 | 7 | 85:30 | 73 |
|
2.63 | 39% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 84% | 74% | 3.38 |
3. | Fellbach | 34 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 79:60 | 61 |
|
2.38 | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95% | 84% | 4.09 |
4. | Schwabisch Hall | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 61:40 | 59 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 83% | 49% | 2.97 |
5. | Hofherrnweiler-Unterromb | 34 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 64:43 | 57 |
|
1.13 | 65% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 62% | 3.15 |
6. | Leinfelden-Echterdingen | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 80:61 | 54 |
|
1.38 | 56% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95% | 84% | 4.15 |
7. | Berg | 34 | 16 | 4 | 14 | 65:54 | 52 |
|
2.25 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 84% | 56% | 3.50 |
8. | TSG Tübingen | 34 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 58:68 | 48 |
|
1.50 | 68% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 74% | 3.71 |
9. | Spfr. Dorfmerkingen | 34 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 65:59 | 48 |
|
1.63 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 84% | 78% | 3.65 |
10. | Pfullingen | 34 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 58:60 | 46 |
|
1.38 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 79% | 3.47 |
11. | Ehingen-Süd | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 99:73 | 42 |
|
1.13 | 71% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 95% | 5.06 |
12. | Biberach | 34 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 65:75 | 44 |
|
1.38 | 68% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94% | 74% | 4.12 |
13. | Ilshofen | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 62:72 | 43 |
|
1.00 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 83% | 67% | 3.94 |
14. | Sindelfingen | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 56:65 | 41 |
|
1.38 | 65% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 73% | 3.56 |
15. | Wangen | 34 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 55:70 | 34 |
|
1.50 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94% | 78% | 3.68 |
16. | Geislingen | 34 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 53:100 | 34 |
|
0.63 | 61% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 89% | 4.50 |
17. | Nagold | 34 | 9 | 3 | 22 | 52:102 | 30 |
|
0.50 | 68% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89% | 79% | 4.53 |
18. | Rutesheim | 34 | 6 | 2 | 26 | 41:109 | 20 |
|
0.50 | 59% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94% | 78% | 4.41 |