Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Vereinigte Staaten - USL League Two - 07/21/23 19:30
4-1 [93+3‘]
4-1 [93+3‘]
Unknown
[1-0]
|
10‘ | |
Unknown
[2-0]
|
36‘ | |
45‘ |
2-1
Unknown
|
|
2-1 HT | ||
Unknown
[3-1]
|
78‘ | |
Unknown
[4-1]
|
84‘ | |
4-1 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Asiatisches Handicap | |||
---|---|---|---|
Linie | 1 | 2 | Linie |
-1.5 | -116 | -109 | +1.5 |
-1.75 | 102 | -143 | +1.75 |
-1.25 | -161 | 116 | +1.25 |
Aufstellungen
Asheville City
-
Asheville City hat gute Form in den letzten 5 Spielen
Trainer kann mit der Form seines Teams (4S, 0U, 1N) aus den letzten 5 Spielen zufrieden sein.
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (4) für Asheville City
Asheville City ist in den letzten 4 USL League Two Spielen ungeschlagen (4S, 0U). Die Spieler erzielten 16 Tore und kassierten 2 in dieser Serie.
-
Gute Form in den letzten 5 Heimspielen für Asheville City
In den letzten 5 Spielen auf dem Memorial Stadium Formbilanz ist (5S, 0U, 0N), was eine Belohnung für Asheville City Fans mit 0 durchschnittlichen Heimzuschauern ist.
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (6) im Heimstadion
Asheville City ist in den letzten 6 Heimspielen in USL League Two ungeschlagen (6S, 0U). Die Spieler erzielten 22 Tore und kassierten 3 in dieser Serie.
Weston
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (3) für Weston
Weston ist in den letzten 3 USL League Two Spielen ungeschlagen (2S, 1U). Die Spieler erzielten 5 Tore und kassierten 3 in dieser Serie.
-
Gute Ergebnisse in den letzten Auswärtsspielen für Weston
Auswärtsspiele sind immer schwierig, aber Weston ist derzeit in guter Form in den letzten 5 Auswärtsspielen. Mit der Formbilanz (3S, 1U, 1N)
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamform
Asheville City Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.7 |
Asheville City
|
9 - 0 |
North Alabama
|
6-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.7 |
Asheville City
|
2 - 0 |
Tennessee
|
1-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
5.7 |
Dalton Red Wolves
|
1 - 2 |
Asheville City
|
0-0 | 6 - 10 | 2 - 6 | 50 - 80 | 3 - 4 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
175 | 275 | 110 | |
1.7 |
Southern Soccer Academy
|
1 - 3 |
Asheville City
|
0-2 | 5 - 11 | 1 - 5 | 46 - 51 | 0 - 6 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
400 | 400 | -250 | |
27.6 |
SC United Bantams
|
2 - 1 |
Asheville City
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
24.6 |
Asheville City
|
4 - 2 |
Dalton Red Wolves
|
1-1 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Weston Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.7 |
Miami
|
3 - 3 |
Weston
|
1-2 | 10 - 4 | 5 - 3 | 60 - 20 | 10 - 0 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
-125 | 230 | 300 | |
12.7 |
Weston
|
1 - 0 |
Miami
|
0-0 | 8 - 13 | 1 - 2 | 51 - 104 | 2 - 5 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
180 | 220 | 125 | |
8.7 |
Weston
|
1 - 0 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
0-0 | 8 - 13 | 3 - 3 | 40 - 79 | 1 - 10 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
150 | 300 | 120 | |
2.7 |
Miami AC
|
1 - 0 |
Weston
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 59 - 60 | 2 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
120 | 250 | 170 | |
1.7 |
Altitude Rush
|
2 - 3 |
Weston
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
24.6 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
0 - 1 |
Weston
|
0-0 | 0 - 0 | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Central Conference | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep North Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Thunder Bay Chill | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 29:9 | 29 |
|
2.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.9 | 92% | 58% | 3.17 |
2. | RKC | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 35:20 | 25 |
|
1.63 | 75% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 4.58 |
3. | St. Croix | 12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16:22 | 16 |
|
1.25 | 58% | 1.2 | 3.0 | 92% | 75% | 3.17 |
4. | WSA Winnipeg | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 21:14 | 18 |
|
1.38 | 82% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 90% | 63% | 3.18 |
5. | Rochester | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15:25 | 14 |
|
0.88 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 |
6. | Minneapolis City | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15:25 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 91% | 0.6 | 1.0 | 82% | 65% | 3.64 |
7. | Milwaukee Bavarians | 12 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 14:30 | 5 |
|
0.63 | 75% | 1.4 | 2.2 | 90% | 60% | 3.67 |
Great Lakes Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Michigan Bucks | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 29:9 | 31 |
|
2.38 | 42% | 1.2 | 2.3 | 67% | 50% | 3.17 |
2. | AFC Ann Arbor | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 23:13 | 19 |
|
1.63 | 55% | 1.0 | 3.3 | 80% | 63% | 3.27 |
3. | Oakland County | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20:22 | 16 |
|
1.63 | 67% | 1.0 | 1.9 | 83% | 67% | 3.50 |
4. | Lansing City | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 15:20 | 16 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 0.8 | 90% | 60% | 2.92 |
5. | Midwest United | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 20:17 | 12 |
|
0.63 | 64% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 72% | 63% | 3.36 |
6. | Kalamazoo FC | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 25:29 | 15 |
|
1.75 | 83% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 75% | 4.50 |
7. | South Bend Lions | 12 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8:30 | 4 |
|
0.25 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 90% | 58% | 3.17 |
Heartland Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Chicago City | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 36:9 | 33 |
|
2.63 | 58% | 1.1 | 2.5 | 100% | 73% | 3.75 |
2. | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 42:11 | 30 |
|
2.25 | 42% | 0.7 | 3.0 | 100% | 92% | 4.42 |
3. | Peoria | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27:17 | 18 |
|
1.50 | 58% | 0.8 | 1.6 | 100% | 67% | 3.67 |
4. | St. Charles | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 23:31 | 18 |
|
1.13 | 67% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 92% | 83% | 4.50 |
5. | Wichita | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 22:28 | 12 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.9 | 92% | 75% | 4.17 |
6. | Chicago Dutch Lions | 12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 12:35 | 9 |
|
1.13 | 50% | 0.6 | 1.7 | 90% | 72% | 3.92 |
7. | Springfield ASC | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 9:40 | 6 |
|
0.38 | 42% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 65% | 65% | 4.08 |
Valley Division | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Fort Wayne | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 31:3 | 32 |
|
2.75 | 17% | 0.1 | 1.2 | 83% | 58% | 2.83 |
2. | Cleveland Force | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 27:18 | 19 |
|
1.75 | 58% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 92% | 83% | 3.75 |
3. | Toledo Villa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 21:19 | 19 |
|
1.50 | 75% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
4. | Kings Hammer | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11:15 | 10 |
|
0.88 | 70% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.60 |
5. | Dayton Dutch Lions | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9:23 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 45% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
6. | Buffalo | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11:32 | 6 |
|
0.50 | 55% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 3.91 |