Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Deutschland - 2. Bundesliga Women - 10/06/24 08:00 - 6.Runde
1-2 [104+14‘]
1-2 [104+14‘]
8‘ |
0-1
Orschmann
|
|
30‘ |
Weiß
|
|
0-1 HT | ||
Bantle
Fisherman
|
46‘ | |
54‘ |
0-2
Abu Sabbah
|
|
62‘ |
Metzker
Halverkamps
|
|
62‘ |
Trojahn
Abu Sabbah
|
|
Bailey-Gayle
Matuschewski
|
63‘ | |
73‘ |
Moraitou
|
|
76‘ |
Frank
Moraitou
|
|
Takizawa
Way
|
84‘ | |
86‘ |
Blaschka
Heiseler
|
|
86‘ |
Janež
Orschmann
|
|
Homann
[1-2]
|
89‘ | |
1-2 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
SC Sand W
Union Berlin W
-
Union Berlin W hat gute Form in den letzten 5 Spielen
Trainer Ailien Poese kann mit der Form seines Teams (3S, 2U, 0N) aus den letzten 5 Spielen zufrieden sein.
-
Ungeschlagene Serie (5) für Union Berlin W
Union Berlin W ist in den letzten 5 2. Bundesliga Women Spielen ungeschlagen (3S, 2U). Die Spieler erzielten 9 Tore und kassierten 2 in dieser Serie.
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamform
SC Sand W Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.9 |
Meppen W
|
2 - 0 |
SC Sand W
|
1-0 | 1 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 8 - 10 | 1 - 0 |
1 (10%) 3 (16%) |
137 | 280 | 130 | |
22.9 |
SC Sand W
|
2 - 2 |
Ingolstadt W
|
1-0 | 12 - 4 | 5 - 2 | 78 - 53 | 5 - 1 |
1 (21%) 3 (29%) |
-333 | 375 | 650 | |
14.9 |
Hamburger SV W
|
2 - 3 |
SC Sand W
|
1-0 | 8 - 11 | 3 - 4 | 63 - 43 | 2 - 0 |
4 (11%) 4 (24%) |
-263 | 375 | 475 | |
8.9 |
SC Sand W
|
0 - 6 |
Bayern Munich W
|
0-2 | 4 - 15 | 3 - 10 | 42 - 112 | 1 - 1 |
0 (22%) 11 (43%) |
5000 | 1600 | -3333 | |
1.9 |
SC Sand W
|
6 - 2 |
Borussia M'gladbach W
|
4-1 | 13 - 11 | 8 - 6 | 30 - 45 | 4 - 5 |
0 (26%) 0 (0%) |
-118 | 260 | 230 | |
25.8 |
Gütersloh W
|
3 - 1 |
SC Sand W
|
2-1 | - | - | - | - |
4 (34%) 6 (22%) |
125 | 300 | 140 |
Union Berlin W Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.9 |
Union Berlin W
|
3 - 0 |
Bayern München II W
|
3-0 | 16 - 5 | 9 - 3 | 56 - 28 | 10 - 3 |
2 (7%) 3 (21%) |
-500 | 450 | 900 | |
22.9 |
Andernach W
|
0 - 2 |
Union Berlin W
|
0-1 | 6 - 15 | 1 - 8 | 24 - 41 | 1 - 10 |
2 (38%) 2 (0%) |
210 | 310 | -118 | |
15.9 |
Union Berlin W
|
2 - 0 |
Weinberg W
|
1-0 | 20 - 3 | 9 - 3 | 61 - 35 | 4 - 0 |
3 (0%) 1 (35%) |
-303 | 450 | 450 | |
8.9 |
Union Berlin W
|
1 - 0 |
RB Leipzig W
|
1-0 | 8 - 6 | 5 - 3 | 39 - 65 | 2 - 3 |
0 (0%) 11 (38%) |
300 | 290 | -154 | |
1.9 |
Nürnberg W
|
0 - 0 |
Union Berlin W
|
0-0 | - | - | - | - |
0 (33%) 0 (0%) |
-105 | 310 | 180 | |
24.8 |
Union Berlin W
|
2 - 2 |
Hamburger SV W
|
2-1 | 15 - 8 | 5 - 4 | 42 - 45 | 3 - 3 |
0 (0%) 10 (22%) |
137 | 333 | 115 |
Tabellen
Regular Season | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Nürnberg W | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 24:6 | 26 |
|
2.75 | 36% | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0% | 0% | 2.73 |
2. | Union Berlin W | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 21:6 | 24 |
|
2.38 | 36% | 1.2 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.45 |
3. | Bochum W | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 18:15 | 21 |
|
1.88 | 55% | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
4. | Hamburger SV W | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 22:8 | 19 |
|
1.88 | 36% | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0% | 0% | 2.73 |
5. | Eintracht Frankfurt II W | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9:7 | 18 |
|
2.25 | 20% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0% | 0% | 1.60 |
6. | Borussia M'gladbach W | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 14:16 | 15 |
|
1.38 | 45% | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.73 |
7. | Meppen W | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15:11 | 14 |
|
1.38 | 60% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0% | 0% | 2.60 |
8. | SC Sand W | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 22:23 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 82% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
9. | Weinberg W | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 12:21 | 14 |
|
1.00 | 45% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0% | 0% | 3.00 |
10. | Gütersloh W | 11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 18:29 | 13 |
|
0.88 | 64% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0% | 0% | 4.27 |
11. | Ingolstadt W | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 12:18 | 9 |
|
1.00 | 36% | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0% | 0% | 2.73 |
12. | Andernach W | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5:14 | 9 |
|
0.75 | 27% | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0% | 0% | 1.73 |
13. | Freiburg II W | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6:16 | 7 |
|
0.50 | 20% | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 2.20 |
14. | Bayern München II W | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9:17 | 6 |
|
0.75 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 2.60 |