Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Asien - AFC Champions League - 01/21/20 07:00
0-1 [90‘]
0-1 [90‘]
Dolah
|
15‘ | |
30‘ |
Schröck
|
|
0-0 HT | ||
51‘ |
0-1
Schröck
(Porteria)
|
|
Prempak
Kraisorn
|
57‘ | |
0-1 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 2 0
KARTEN 1 0
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Port FC
Status: Bestätigte Aufstellung
Ceres Philippines
Aufstellungen
Statistiken:
BANK
Port FC
-
Trainer hat kompletten Kader verfügbar
Das medizinische Personal und Trainer J. Meelarp können sich wirklich über einen vollständigen Kader freuen.
Ceres Philippines
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamform
Port FC Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.11 |
Ratchaburi Mitrphol FC
|
0 - 1 |
Port FC
|
0-0 | 6 - 10 | 4 - 6 | 55 - 90 | 1 - 8 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
26.10 |
Port FC
|
2 - 2 |
Pattaya United
|
1-1 | 15 - 11 | 7 - 2 | 72 - 46 | 7 - 4 |
9 (21%) 1 (73%) |
- | - | - | |
20.10 |
Buriram United
|
3 - 1 |
Port FC
|
2-1 | 13 - 12 | 6 - 6 | 67 - 59 | 4 - 5 |
2 (63%) 2 (64%) |
- | - | - | |
2.10 |
Port FC
|
4 - 0 |
Chainat Hornbill
|
1-0 | 10 - 12 | 7 - 3 | 81 - 75 | 4 - 7 |
2 (62%) 1 (66%) |
-303 | 400 | 600 | |
27.9 |
Port FC
|
3 - 0 |
Nakhonratchasima Mazda FC
|
2-0 | - | - | - | 6 - 4 |
3 (51%) 2 (51%) |
-227 | 375 | 500 | |
22.9 |
Chiangmai
|
0 - 2 |
Port FC
|
0-0 | 3 - 5 | 1 - 3 | 27 - 64 | 4 - 3 |
7 (42%) 0 (49%) |
275 | 275 | -137 |
Ceres Philippines Last 6 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.1 |
Ceres Philippines
|
3 - 2 |
Shan United
|
2-0 | 20 - 8 | 6 - 3 | 54 - 35 | 4 - 1 |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
5.2 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 2 |
Yangon United
|
1-1 | - | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
8.8 |
Home United
|
2 - 0 |
Ceres Philippines
|
0-0 | 11 - 10 | 5 - 2 | 53 - 89 | 4 - 8 |
0 (63%) 0 (34%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1 - 1 |
Home United
|
1-1 | 18 - 5 | 6 - 3 | 98 - 44 | 6 - 4 |
11 (0%) 11 (0%) |
- | - | - | |
16.5 |
Yangon United
|
3 - 2 |
Ceres Philippines
|
1-1 | 13 - 8 | 4 - 7 | 75 - 55 | 6 - 0 |
2 (71%) 2 (49%) |
- | - | - | |
9.5 |
Ceres Philippines
|
4 - 2 |
Yangon United
|
3-0 | 19 - 8 | 10 - 4 | 76 - 46 | 5 - 2 |
0 (46%) 1 (76%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Group Stage | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group A | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Al Ahli | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4:6 | 6 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 75% | 75% | 2.50 |
2. | Esteghlal | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 100% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Shorta | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 75% | 1.5 | 6.0 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Wahda | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
|
0.00 | 50% | - | - | 50% | 0% | 0 |
Group B | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Pakhtakor | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7:3 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 33% | 2.0 | 0.8 | 50% | 50% | 1.67 |
2. | Al Hilal | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6:2 | 11 |
|
2.20 | 40% | 0.6 | 5.4 | 67% | 42% | 1.60 |
3. | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4:4 | 7 |
|
1.40 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.4 | 42% | 42% | 1.60 |
4. | Padideh Khorasan | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0:8 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 0% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 33% | 17% | 1.33 |
Group C | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Persepolis | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 100% | 1.2 | 1.3 | 50% | 33% | 2.17 |
2. | Al Duhail | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 33% | 2.0 | 3.2 | 67% | 33% | 2.50 |
3. | Al Taawoun | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 33% | 17% | 2.00 |
4. | Al Sharjah | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13:11 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 1.7 | 3.5 | 83% | 83% | 4.00 |
Group D | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Al Nassr | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9:5 | 11 |
|
1.83 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 83% | 33% | 2.33 |
2. | Al Sadd | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14:8 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 67% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 100% | 83% | 3.67 |
3. | Sepahan | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:8 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 17% | 1.0 | 4.3 | 83% | 50% | 2.33 |
4. | Al Ain | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:13 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 33% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 67% | 67% | 3.00 |
Group E | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Beijing Guoan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12:4 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 67% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 |
2. | Melbourne Victory | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:9 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 50% | 2.5 | 4.0 | 67% | 50% | 2.50 |
3. | Seoul | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10:9 | 6 |
|
1.00 | 67% | 1.3 | 6.5 | 83% | 83% | 3.17 |
4. | Singha Chiangrai United | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:11 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group F | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Ulsan | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14:5 | 16 |
|
2.67 | 100% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 100% | 67% | 3.17 |
2. | Tokyo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6:5 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 50% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 |
3. | Shanghai Shenhua | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9:13 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 83% | 83% | 3.67 |
4. | Perth Glory | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5:11 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 67% | 50% | 2.67 |
Group G | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Vissel Kobe | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9:6 | 9 |
|
1.80 | 100% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 75% | 42% | 3.00 |
2. | Guangzhou Evergrande | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.25 | 50% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 75% | 25% | 2.00 |
3. | Suwon Bluewings | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:4 | 5 |
|
1.00 | 100% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 50% | 17% | 1.60 |
4. | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3:6 | 3 |
|
1.50 | 100% | 3.5 | 3.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 |
Group H | |||||||||||||||
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Yokohama F. Marinos | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13:5 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
2. | Shanghai Port | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 1.7 | 0.2 | 83% | 67% | 2.67 |
3. | Jeonbuk Motors | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:10 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 67% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
4. | Sydney | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8:10 | 5 |
|
0.83 | 50% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 83% | 67% | 3.00 |
Pokalsituation
Wettbewerbe | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Kitchee 06/24/21
|
Group Stage |
1st Round | |
League Cup
vs Muang Loei United 01/12/22
|
1st Round |
Wettbewerbe | |
---|---|
AFC Champions League
vs Tokyo 01/28/20
|
Play-offs |