Spielvorschau
MATCH REPORT
Deutschland - Regionalliga Women - 10/11/20 08:00 - 4.Runde
2-0 [90‘]
2-0 [90‘]
HT | ||
2-0 FT |
Spielstatistiken
KARTEN 0 0
KARTEN 0 0
QUOTEN
Aufstellungen
Bitburg W
Holzbach W
Zusammenfassung
H2H
H2H (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
FORM
FORM (HEIM/AUSWÄRTS)
Teamstärke
Kopf-an-Kopf
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 |
---|
Teamform
Bitburg W Last 2 Matches
Holzbach W Last 5 Matches
HAL |
Schüsse |
Schüsse (aufs Tor) |
Gefährlicher Angriff |
Ecken |
Aufstellung Änderungen |
1 | X | 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.10 |
Holzbach W
|
1 - 2 |
Montabaur W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
26.9 |
Weinberg W
|
7 - 1 |
Holzbach W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
20.9 |
Holzbach W
|
1 - 5 |
Göttelborn W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
4.8 |
Holzbach W
|
0 - 4 |
Nürnberg W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - | ||
12.8 |
FFC 08 Niederkirchen W
|
5 - 1 |
Holzbach W
|
- | - | - | - |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
- | - | - |
Tabellen
Südwest | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Team | SP | S | U | L | T | Pkt | Form | PPG | BTTS | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | DURCHS. T | ||
1. | Göttelborn W | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22:2 | 15 |
|
3.00 | 40% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 4.80 |
2. | Wormatia Worms W | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16:10 | 15 |
|
2.50 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 100% | 4.33 |
3. | Riegelsberg W | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15:5 | 13 |
|
2.60 | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.00 |
4. | Wörrstadt W | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17:12 | 13 |
|
2.17 | 100% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.83 |
5. | Schott Mainz W | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16:12 | 10 |
|
1.67 | 67% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75% | 63% | 4.67 |
6. | Issel W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 22:10 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 75% | 5.33 |
7. | Bad Neuenahr W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15:12 | 9 |
|
1.50 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.50 |
8. | Saarbrücken II W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8:8 | 7 |
|
1.40 | 60% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 33% | 3.20 |
9. | Fortuna Göcklingen W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15:16 | 7 |
|
1.17 | 83% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 67% | 5.17 |
10. | Montabaur W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9:9 | 6 |
|
1.20 | 40% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 83% | 3.60 |
11. | Dirmingen W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8:16 | 6 |
|
1.20 | 80% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 83% | 4.80 |
12. | Holzbach W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4:11 | 3 |
|
0.60 | 40% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 33% | 3.00 |
13. | Bitburg W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2:17 | 3 |
|
0.75 | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% | 50% | 4.75 |
14. | Fidei W | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6:27 | 3 |
|
0.50 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 83% | 83% | 5.50 |
15. | Siegelbach W | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3:11 | 1 |
|
0.17 | 50% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67% | 67% | 2.33 |